On the contrary. I'm pointing out the real author here, which is the AI generating the code (or the people whose code was used as training data for the AI), not the man telling it to do so.It seems like you're bending over backward here to alienate the author from his work
You know, like when you order your dinner in a restaurant, you'll not magically become the "author" or creator of the food you're eating, just because you told the server what you want to eat. Instead that title will still go to the chef who cooked it or to the person who invented the recipe.
The rest of your comment in similar nonsense, the result of not understanding even just the basics involved here.