Posts: 8,769 +1,671
I have a question.... Why does almost every benchmarks forget about ryzen 7 4800h? Wasn't the i7 placed in the level?
That’s right. We didn’t get one to test in time for this review. We have one now though, if all goes well expect that review next week.I'm pretty sure TechSpot just haven't tested it yet, so they have no 4800H data to compare to.
I am not buying an Intel laptop... period... so OEMs, get your s*** together.
Yep pretty impressed. It certainly got my attention.You gotta give it to the 4900HS. Performance is on average higher, single threaded is not miles away, and it'll be vastly more power efficient. That means less heat, less noise from the cooling, and considerably longer battery life. There is every chance they could even end up a couple hundred bucks cheaper.
I'd say this is a pretty safe bet.Well unfortunately that may never happen. Ian Cutress (Senior editor at Anandtech and review fellow for over 10 years) made a comment about Intel incentivizing companies to NOT make AMD based products.
It's an assumption to think the same would apply to laptops and I only say this because of their track history. I hope this is looked into more.