I'd rather just have them remove the graphics core from the chip. No real gamer uses that.
TechSpot gave the lowest rating to both i7-4770K and i7-4790K amid everybody else who reviewed it.
In the meantime, i7-4770K has been the best selling CPU ever.
Whatever grudge TechSpot got with these CPU, it seems biased. i7-4770K has been the best CPU out there for a while now, it should have rating of 100, and not the measly 80.
On NewEgg it's still is the Customer Choice Award Winner.
Not only it does no harm, but it is perfect non-game PC-s. So why would Intel remove it? It makes no sense.
Replace it with more cores
You didn't give enough info about temps !
you could have run the new chip together with the old one at the same low clocks something like 3.6-4.0
and see the temp difference there in idle and load
One game I would have loved to see included in the tests is planetside 2. I have a 24/7 overclock on my 3770k of 4.6ghz and that game still gives it a run for it's money. However, I see no justifiable reason to upgrade from my 3770k. Heres to hoping the 5770k is a good bit faster.
Even though I have a 2600K myself, this statement is getting a bit old. I'm almost wishing for the encouragement you are referring to.Still nothing to encourage me to upgrade from my i7 2600k @ 4.7Ghz.
I usually upgrade every three generations, he has another good two years left in his 2600k. Especially depending on the games he plays. Newer games just aren't that CPU demanding. They keep finding ways to offload more work to the graphics card making a fast CPU less important.Even though I have a 2600K myself, this statement is getting a bit old. I'm almost wishing for the encouragement you are referring to.Still nothing to encourage me to upgrade from my i7 2600k @ 4.7Ghz.
Even though I have a 2600K myself, this statement is getting a bit old. I'm almost wishing for the encouragement you are referring to.
hoping the 5770k is a good bit faster.
it's not like AMD is giving them much reason to innovate. IIRC, Intel has what they call tick/tock cycles. One being a new architecture and the other being slight improvements on the previous architecture. I think this is one of their tock cycles improving on the previous generation. The 5770k will be a new architecture.hoping the 5770k is a good bit faster.
Mehh...at the rate Intel is going, it'll be a 7770k or perhaps a 8770k? oO
Overall it looks like a nice chip, I think Intel has squeezed a lot out of 4 cores. It is time for more cores .
That is true but it will happen since it will be better to market more cores. Some people just look at cores and think, "wow, this has twice as many cores. It must be 2x as fast!"there aren't enough multi threaded applications that can take advantage of multiple cores. Intel's hyper threading is good enough. Neither Intel or AMD have a true 8core CPU, although AMD's version is closer than Intel's. AMD is a prime example that more cores does not equal faster.