Intel finalizes design for Intel 20A and Intel 18A process nodes

nanoguy

Posts: 1,355   +27
Staff member
Bottom line: Intel executives love to tell a good story about the company's ability to innovate and do it fast enough to catch the competition, but it's difficult to take them seriously when the actual products are always on the horizon. Still, the chip giant says it's making important progress on advanced process technologies that will move out of the lab in 2024 at the earliest.

Industry watchers have had their eyes set on Intel's 3nm-based technologies, which are expected to debut in consumer CPUs as soon as next year. In the meantime, the company seems to be hard at work on more advanced process nodes such as Intel 18A and 20A that are central to its future as a semiconductor giant.

According to a Taiwanese news outlet, Intel's Foundry Services division has finished the tape-out process for the two fabrication technologies. The publication cites the senior vice president and chairman of Intel China, who explained the first chips based on an Intel 18A process could be made in a trial run sometime in the second half of 2024. However, mass production of commercial products based on it isn't planned to start until 2025.

Both Intel 20A and Intel 18A are based around something called gate-all-around FET transistors (GAAFET), which is a common theme for all foundries developing process nodes where the transistor gate pitch is smaller than 3nm. Intel's version of this is called RibbonFET and represents a major design change since the introduction of FinFET in 2011.

Another advantage of Intel's new tech is backside power delivery (called PowerVia). At least in theory, this should allow for higher logic densities, higher boost clock speeds, and lower power leakage — leading to more energy-efficient designs that are expected to outperform those produced by companies like Samsung Foundry or TSMC.

Also read: How did TSMC get so good?

This is a huge bet that could help Intel's Foundry Services division secure large chipmaking contracts in the coming years while making its products more competitive with Arm-based and AMD designs. It's also a risky and costly transition as it requires adding several steps to the manufacturing process and using additional materials and equipment when compared to previous nodes.

Time, however, is not on Intel's side. The company made efforts to ensure it would be the first to use bleeding-edge ASML Twinscan EXE scanners with 0.55 NA optics for the Intel 18A node, but this would have led to delays it can't afford. As a result, the company has chosen to rely on existing EUV machines to bring the process to market faster.

Whether or not this strategy will pan out as planned is anyone's guess, but suffice it to say analysts aren't nearly as optimistic as Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger. The general sentiment is that the company is in a very bad place, and not just because of lower consumer demand, the rise of homegrown silicon, or the constant cost-cutting going on across the organization. Intel's Foundry Services ambitions are a long-term dream that isn't expected to materialize before the end of this decade.

Permalink to story.

 
Hope it all works out - I wonder how many eggs in that basket - didn't some eggs smash awhile back trying to get onto a new node ?
always got TSMC as a back up for their chips I suppose
 
Oh how the mighty have fallen.
They should have been expanding their fabs for third parties years ago. We had 6 years of 14nm. Intel got too complacent in the good times and thought they would never have competition. Let's hope that the chips act US tax payers money actually turns the company around and makes them a leading fab again.
 
The future is foundries. Intel needs to push harder in this area if it wishes to stay alive.

Intel does not in any way shape or form have the money to build EUV foundries for 3nm or less. Even TSMC is spending obscene amounts of money (. $40 billion) ust for 3nm and guess what, it's one of the worse node improvements on record. They should have saved their money and kept refining N4 and waited until they had some real progress with 2nm node. Intel is in deep financial trouble and will have to rely on third party more and more.
 
I am not too sure if foundries will be highly profitable business in the longer run. The shortage over the pandemic period sparked this thought that there is a massive shortage of foundries to produce all the chips. With all the key foundry players making huge investment to expand their chip making capability, I feel it is not going to end well. And with the likes of US constantly trying to twist the arms of corporates to stop sale of chips to whomever not playing ball with them, you will have a bunch of foundries and a lot of chips, but with a shrinking demand due to sanctions. So another bomb waiting to explode.
 
I'll believe their technical superiority when I see it. Intel is tooting their own horn again.
 
Oh how the mighty have fallen.
They should have been expanding their fabs for third parties years ago. We had 6 years of 14nm. Intel got too complacent in the good times and thought they would never have competition. Let's hope that the chips act US tax payers money actually turns the company around and makes them a leading fab again.

It isn't that they got complacent with fabrication technologies but rather that they tried to bite off way too much more than they could chew with their 10nm process. Basically hubris over complacency.
 
Back