Intel is now installing a telemetry data sniffer with its graphics drivers

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 1,025   +302
Staff
Facepalm: Intel Arc represents a fresh GPU brand that Intel is aiming to position as a formidable competitor to Nvidia and AMD. While the performance might not be on par just yet, Intel's software is already adopting some of the less desirable software tactics utilized by its competitors.

Intel has introduced a new component in its Arc GPU Graphics Software that seems to have little connection with graphics hardware. The software suite, encompassing GPU drivers and control tools, now incorporates a telemetry-based feature intended to collect and transmit user data back to Intel.

The new telemetry component is referred to as the Compute Improvement Program (CIP), and it comes activated by default within the setup options. To prevent the installation of the CIP, users must be vigilant during the installation process and make appropriate customization choices. As TechPowerUp uncovered, the initial installation of the CIP component will be remembered and carried over to future Arc GPU software installations and updates.

According to the official support documentation, the Compute Improvement Program is intended to "empower you by providing the best computing experience." CIP gathers information about computer performance to enhance upcoming software releases, and Intel takes measures to protect users' data with "all reasonable efforts." Intel claims CIP doesn't collect sensitive personal information such as names, email addresses, or phone numbers.

However, the "Collected Data" section of the aforementioned documentation provides some concerning details about what CIP actually entails. Intel is interested in telemetry regarding the "categories" of websites users visit (excluding the URLs themselves), "how you use your computer," general system information, "other devices" present in a user's computing environment, and more.

Intel also states that the information collected through Arc GPU telemetry may be shared with its partners and processed by other "authorized service providers," which, as per the Intel Privacy Notice, includes third-party companies focused on personalized ads and other forms of targeted advertising.

Collecting usage data through software telemetry is not a novel concept, and the GPU software sector is particularly known for this type of user-unfriendly practice. Nvidia goes as far as to install its telemetry component alongside the GeForce GPU drivers, without an easy option to disable it. AMD, on the other hand, seems to be taking a more user-friendly approach, as the company clearly presents an opt-in choice for telemetry during the Radeon Software Adrenalin installation.

Permalink to story.

 
Ok...the Intel CIP is included in the Intel Driver Update Assistant too. Are you all sitting here thinking AMD and Nvidia don't have telemetry included or something? Lastly, how do you expect Intel or the others to catch specific issues with specific hardware combinations without telemetry? Do you want them to manifest carbon copies of everyones hardware and do in house testing or something?

Oh hey you guys know the Intel and AMD chipset drivers have telemetry in them too so you may as well not have a computer at all right? What is Microsoft Windows???

Can we seriously just stop talking about telemetry, forever? Your birth certificate is telemetry...
 
yea, nvidia with the spyware "GeforceExperience" but at least AMD ask clearly at the end of the driver install if you want to share your data, and you are free to refuse...
That won't stop them from sharing it anyway; just gives you the illusion of control.
 
Last edited:
So basically what AMD and Nvidia already do?

Nothing new here, it's the way of life now. You have 0 privacy on the inter webs or in the software you use.
 
Excellent way to alienate all current and future customers!
Only the ignorant ones. Intel wants reliable data on how their graphics cards are being used, in order to provide better drivers (and eventually: hardware) to users. Much better than a couple of developers making random guesses over whether to optimize their cards for Adobe Flash or not.

So my f**** browsing history!
Except for the URLS themselves, yes. In other words: only the graphics-intensive features the sites use.
 
They barely managed to create semi-capable graphics cards and they already doing same crap as nVidia. Only it took nVidia more than a decade to come to this.
Well, if you can't compete at performance levels at least you can always beat your opponent at ****ery.
 
Back