Intel Nova Lake-S midrange CPUs could be bringing AMD's X3D cache trick to more affordable chips

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,001   +58
Staff
Rumor mill: Intel is betting on large caches to boost performance in its next desktop lineup, and new details show that approach extending into the midrange. Those details come from a post by well-known Intel leaker Jaykihn, who says Intel is working on two Core Ultra 5 400S chips based on the upcoming Nova Lake-S platform. Both CPUs are described as 22-core designs built on a single compute tile, aimed at mainstream desktops, including gaming-focused rigs.

According to the post, each processor combines 6 "Coyote Cove" P-cores, 12 "Arctic Wolf" E-cores, and 4 LP-E cores. That mix suggests a design that balances compute throughput with background and low-power tasks, rather than just piling on more performance cores.

The standout detail in the updated specs is the cache. Intel is said to be attaching a large block of big Last Level Cache, or bLLC, to these chips.

The bLLC adds 108 MB on top of the standard cache, and the configuration can expose up to 144 MB of bLLC, according to the leak. The approach echoes AMD's X3D models, but the scale suggests Intel is pushing cache size even more aggressively in these particular midrange parts.

The aim is to keep more data on the chip and closer to the cores. In gaming and other latency-sensitive tasks, performance often depends less on raw core count and more on how quickly the CPU can access the data it needs from memory.

By building out bLLC, Intel is trying to reduce stalls and smooth out frame delivery, especially in titles that benefit from large working sets held in cache.

The two Core Ultra 5 models look almost identical, aside from power and overclocking. One is expected to ship as an unlocked 125 W part for users who want to push clocks higher. The other is a 65 W version with locked settings, aimed at standard desktops. Based on Jaykihn's report, there are no other meaningful differences between the two.

Higher up the stack, Nova Lake-S appears to be a much broader family. Other leaks point to configurations with up to 52 cores on the same platform, bringing workstation-like parallelism into what is nominally a consumer lineup.

That core scaling carries heavy power demands, with reports of peak power draw approaching the mid-400 W range for top-end, overclockable chips.

The platform around these processors is also changing to support the more demanding hardware. Intel's LGA-1954 socket, linked to Nova Lake-S, uses a dual-lever loading mechanism similar to what the company has used on its high-end desktop and workstation platforms.

With pin counts nearing 2,000, this kind of clamping system is meant to ensure stable contact and handle larger packages.

Some variants of Nova Lake-S are expected to go beyond a single compute tile and pair that layout with even more cache, potentially doubling bLLC for flagship models. Those high-end parts are likely to sit well above the Core Ultra 5 series, which instead brings the cache-first strategy into more accessible territory.

Intel has not confirmed any of this publicly, and timelines remain uncertain. Early indications suggest the first Nova Lake-S chips could arrive within the next few months, with the broader Core Ultra 400 family rolling out over a longer window.

Industry chatter still points to a CES cycle for some of the bigger announcements, though supply and component issues could shift those plans.

Permalink to story:

 
Now copy AMDs infinity cache concept.
Then make a iGPU that smartly coordinates how to use this cache for the CPU or GPU (or divide it up somehow).

Beat AMD at their own game and release a superb iGPU that'll do 1080p ultra / 1440p medium gaming.

(I thought that was AMDs plan from day 1 with infinity cache, but I guess they won't until someone else does it first)
 
Now copy AMDs infinity cache concept.
Then make a iGPU that smartly coordinates how to use this cache for the CPU or GPU (or divide it up somehow).

Beat AMD at their own game and release a superb iGPU that'll do 1080p ultra / 1440p medium gaming.

(I thought that was AMDs plan from day 1 with infinity cache, but I guess they won't until someone else does it first)

Intel did this 13 years ago with Iris Pro and later Iris Plus. They worked very well and I started PC gaming on these iGPUs. Also Intel's current iGPUs match and beat the Radeon 890m, AMD's best affordable (<$1000) iGPU.

It's on AMD now to release RDNA4 iGPUs or get RDNA5 iGPUs out the door ASAP.
 
"No one can give you what we can promise."
-- any big corpo PR

I will believe its affordable when it lands on my desk.

I doubt Intel will price these out of the market, but the bigger question is how do they reach economies of scale. They managed to move the needle with the 200 plus parts, but had to sell them at half the price of the previous parts. The fab business is very expensive, and Intel will have to move units to pay for it. But selling 52 and 22 core parts for the same or similar prices to AMD's 6 and 8 core parts may put them back on top with sales, but how long can they keep this up without showing a profit?
 
Affordable CPU's would be great if we had affordable RAM.
Which we don't.
Rich people who can afford to buy hardware don't care about saving a few tenners.

My next Windows PC may NEVER happen.
 
... selling 52 and 22 core parts for the same or similar prices to AMD's 6 and 8 core parts may put them back on top with sales, but how long can they keep this up without showing a profit?
Its more like 6+12 vs 12/24.
IOD chiplet in Zen 6 CPU may or may not have some LPE cores too.
BTW ... I doubt there will be a lot of 6 core Zen 6 CPUs in desktop. At least from start.

To lure AM5 owner to buy these Intel should price them way cheaper or they have to deliver much higher performance.
The possibility of Zen6 X3D being cheaper than (bLLC NVL-S + new MB) is high.

The big question is what will Intel sell to make profit?
 
We already have x3d cache on pretty affordable chips. A Ryzen 7600x3d is $240 on Amazon. If you are going with a leftover DDR4 ram build a Ryzen 5500x3d is like $170 off Aliexpress. I doubt these new Intel chips will be cheaper than that.
 
Back