Intel reports massive quarterly loss as PC demand continues to wane

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,303   +193
Staff member
In brief: Intel finished 2022 on wobbly legs but is steadfast in its belief that greener pastures are looming. Intel reported revenue of $14.0 billion for the fourth quarter ending December 31, 2022, which is down 32 percent compared to the same period a year earlier. Gross margin slid to 39.2 percent from 53.6 percent a year earlier, and net income (loss) was $644 million. Earnings per share (loss) for the quarter checked in at $0.16.

Notably, Intel remained profitable for the full year with $63.1 billion in total revenue and net income of $8.01 billion. For comparison, Intel generated $79 billion in revenue and $19.9 billion in net income in 2021.

Intel boss Pat Gelsinger said despite the economic and market headwinds, they continued to make good progress on their strategic transformation in the fourth quarter which included advancing their product roadmap and improving operational structure and processes to further drive efficiencies.

In 2023, Gelsinger said, they will continue to work through short-term challenges. Intel CEO David Zinsner added that steps taken to right-size the organization and rationalize investments underpin cost-reduction targets of $3 billion in 2023 and puts them on the road to achieving $8 billion to $10 billion in savings by the end of 2025.

None of this is terribly surprising as Intel's results reflect what has taken place across the wider PC market in recent months.

Market analyst IDC recently said shipments of traditional PCs were down 28.1 percent over the holidays compared to the same period in 2021. Shipments of hard drives were nearly split in half last year and even peripheral maker Logitech saw sales slide around 23 percent during the holiday quarter.

Related reading: The Rise, Fall and Renaissance of AMD

Strong competition from market rival AMD has not helped Intel's efforts either, nor has Apple's trek into in-house hardware. Apple started the transition to its own processor design in late 2020 and at this point, nearly every new Mac is offered with Apple silicon inside.

Share value in Intel is down more than seven percent as of this writing.

Permalink to story.

 
Intel CEO: AMD is on the rear view mirror:

AMD:

f7509808fadbc7fa4e866a52d9db440ab95b4b43ae073f4bde0d5380576aa4cd.jpg
 
Couldn‘t have happened to a nicer company.

I think AMD‘s strategy of designing Zen to attack Intel on server paid off. And I expect Intel to continue suffering in the formerly high margin server area with the current economic conditions.
 
Wow no one is making a comment on that CHIPS ACT where they got Billions less than a month ago and just a few days ago lied and now canceled that new facility? No one is mad about that? Am I seeing this the wrong way?

No, you're seeing it *exactly* the right way, and everyone from Biden on down knew it was just another handout, exactly like TARP, "broadband initiatives" and all the rest. Intel is a proud member of the "too big to fail" club.
 
Wow no one is making a comment on that CHIPS ACT where they got Billions less than a month ago and just a few days ago lied and now canceled that new facility? No one is mad about that? Am I seeing this the wrong way?
The CHIPS Act is a way of justifying giving taxpayers' money to big tech in my opinion. The supposed plan to build more fabs don't make a lot of sense to me. You can double or triple chip making capacity by building more fabs. However, fabs don't magically produce chips with no raw materials, skilled labor, etc. And if they are banning anyone from selling to China and a bunch of other countries on their bad books, who's buying all these chips?
 
I don't think they even care
everyone gets paycheque and there is only one competitor. ppl come and go so yes I dont think they do... but...if majority of buyers would skip this gen - decline in 80%+ in profits I think they might feel something 😁
 
Last edited:
Well it's strange but I don't want Intel to disappear! The best products we could get are when there is competition. Already AMD is pricing the big threadripper hitters at 7K .
 
It because NOBODY wants to buy LGA1700 anything.... when iNTEL already announced it's EOL (ie: dead) because this year they are releasing LGA1851...

People are upset with INTEL's one and done motherboard mentality.... that made AM4 and AM5 so enduring.
 
Well it's strange but I don't want Intel to disappear! The best products we could get are when there is competition. Already AMD is pricing the big threadripper hitters at 7K .
Neither do I - just want them to suffer / shrink to a level where they can no longer compete on ‘financial horsepower‘ and use that to dictate which systems OEM offer their customers.

Imagine if rather than offering incentives to stifle offers using competitors‘ components they actually had to compete on merit.
 
Wow no one is making a comment on that CHIPS ACT where they got Billions less than a month ago and just a few days ago lied and now canceled that new facility? No one is mad about that? Am I seeing this the wrong way?
I want to give Intel the benefit of doubt here because Chips Act are mainly for fabrication of chips in US homeland. Intel still building their new Fab 52 and 62 in Arizona.

the cancelled fab in Israel and delayed fab in Germany are irrelevant to Chips Act.
 
Wow no one is making a comment on that CHIPS ACT where they got Billions less than a month ago and just a few days ago lied and now canceled that new facility? No one is mad about that? Am I seeing this the wrong way?
Tax payers always lose. Everything is rigged for those that make the rules.
 
Back