iPhone Air proves durable and repair-friendly despite slim design

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,829   +202
Staff member
In a nutshell: When Apple announced its thinnest smartphone ever earlier this month – the iPhone Air – many wondered how the company had managed the feat from a design perspective. Some compromises, such as including only a single rear camera, were immediately apparent. Apple also acknowledged that battery life would not match that of its full-size models. Still, plenty of questions remained. Thanks to iFixit, we now have some answers.

When the team cracked open the iPhone Air, it quickly became clear how Apple had achieved its slim design. In short, the company packed the logic board and related components into the thicker camera plateau at the top of the phone, leaving the rest of the device free to house the battery.

We also learned through reviews (and confirmed via iFixit's teardown) that Apple deleted the lower speaker, leaving the iPhone with only a single (non-stereo) speaker. While it does have fewer bells and whistles compared to its bigger (and more expensive) siblings, iFixit described the internal design as lean and efficient.

As it turns out, a more consolidated design does not necessarily equate to a device that is more difficult to repair. Following its thorough teardown, iFixit awarded the iPhone Air a seven out of 10 repairability score.

The use of modular components really helps with repairs, and the dual entry design facilitates easier battery swaps (as does the electrically debonding adhesive used to hold the battery pack in place).

Another benefit of cramming all of the hardware bits into the top of the phone and constructing its frame out of titanium is durability. Zack from Jerry Rig Everything put the iPhone Air to the test yet despite his best efforts, he could not bend the phone with his hands alone.

With some mechanical assistance, Zack determined that it took 216 pounds of pressure to bend the phone enough to shatter the display. Remarkably, the back glass remained intact through it all.

The iPhone Air "has no business being this indestructible," he said.

Image credit: iFixit

Permalink to story:

 
I was really shocked by the bend test, I figured for sure that would be a pain point for the phone. The rest of the compromises aren't really worth it in my opinion, but apparently for some people it is.
 
I was really shocked by the bend test, I figured for sure that would be a pain point for the phone. The rest of the compromises aren't really worth it in my opinion, but apparently for some people it is.
I'm not too surprised. Titanium is a pretty tough metal for the same dimensions in something like aluminum and steel.

I suspect this phone will be popular with people who just want a phone, and one that comfortably fits in their hands. They don't want a camera+TV+phone all in one device, just a phone, and they want it to fit comfortably in their pockets, hands, and bags. The Pro model will still probably be more popular, but the Air will certainly find its audience.
 
I'm often wrong when it comes to what Apple is able to sell successfully.

I thought their small phones would sell well as people online in great numbers complain about huge sizes wanting a smaller one.

So I'm going to reverse my own expectations (who wants a phone with so many downsides when the only upside being weight and thickness - but has a camera bump negating it)...
So I'm going to say this is going to sell extremely well. Everyone who cares about form than function will want one and other brands will predictably do the same. It's the new category no one thought there was room for and will outsell foldables two to one.
 
Still with this "aesthetic over battery life" push. And with an even uglier bump to boot.

Imagine if they put in a battery that's 2x thicker, how many days off of a single charge you could go with it...
 
I'm often wrong when it comes to what Apple is able to sell successfully.
I thought their small phones would sell well as people online in great numbers complain about huge sizes wanting a smaller one.

Me too and actually I was quite wrong about what I wanted in a smaller phone. I was sick of the big pocket bulge and weight, so I opted for a smaller phone. It was only then I realized how much I valued the larger screen. I thought I wanted a smaller phone, but actually I wanted a thinner phone. Right now have the Pro Max with the Arc Pulse (corner bumpers), glass protectors on both front and back. It's amazing how less bulky it feels, cases add so much size to phones but you can't do without something.

Personally I think this phone is more about proving the 'FOLD' that is coming rather than offering a slim version. The slim will provide valuable data on the construction of the chassis and its durability. Data on the new (metal can) battery technology - how it handles heat/cold, expansion, power etc. Edit to add: how the new logic board performs, it has a higher stacked density.


Imagine if they put in a battery that's 2x thicker, how many days off of a single charge you could go with it...
Then you have the Pro and not the slim!? You can actually make it 2x thicker with the dedicated MagSafe battery. It's built for the slim exactly, is a solid fit and feels like it's really part of the phone, if you want it.
 
Then you have the Pro and not the slim!? You can actually make it 2x thicker with the dedicated MagSafe battery. It's built for the slim exactly, is a solid fit and feels like it's really part of the phone, if you want it.
I meant natively. A battery pack is a worse experience, especially a wireless one (inherently inefficient).

And they have the space for the Air to instead have an amazing battery life, but went for a ridiculous form factor...
 
Credit where it is due, more repairable designs are always a plus. If apple wanted to they could be the most pro consumer company on earth.
I meant natively. A battery pack is a worse experience, especially a wireless one (inherently inefficient).

And they have the space for the Air to instead have an amazing battery life, but went for a ridiculous form factor...
Right....and then you'd have the pro max. So why not buy that? Why would they need two pro max sized phones?
 
...The Pro Max doesn't have double the battery life of the Air 🤦‍♂️
It also doesnt have double the battery.

If you actually use your phone, the pro max has a significantly longer SoT then the Air does.

https://www.macrumors.com/2025/09/18/iphone-air-vs-iphone-17-pro-max-battery-life-test/

The pro max has nearly 50% longer runtimes then the Air does, and is doing so with a larger screen.

so if you want an Air, but you want significantly longer runtimes, but also dont want the external battery....buy the pro max.
 
I am glad to see they are making them easier to repair...

As for the skinny phone, that is nice but the camera bump is still an issue. I hate this damn camera bump, it is really annoying for those of us who don't want a case surrounding their phone. I would rather they just make the phone thicker and with a bigger battery to eliminate the bump. I want a flat back on my phone like the old iPhones. The iPhone 7 was pretty dang thin and the camera bump wasn't as bad, but it wouldn't have been a big ask to make the back flat and add another millimeter or two of battery thickness.
 
It also doesnt have double the battery.

If you actually use your phone, the pro max has a significantly longer SoT then the Air does.

https://www.macrumors.com/2025/09/18/iphone-air-vs-iphone-17-pro-max-battery-life-test/

The pro max has nearly 50% longer runtimes then the Air does, and is doing so with a larger screen.

so if you want an Air, but you want significantly longer runtimes, but also dont want the external battery....buy the pro max.
Yeah, so, now imagine the Air but double the battery (like I originally said). A phone that would be close to 24hrs normal use, or close to 54hrs offline video.
Heck, go even further and make a similar phone but get rid of the camera bump (nobody I know likes a camera bump) by putting a healthy amount of battery in it instead.

Go back to the days when a phone could easily last the whole day and then some. But no, gotta keep going for the skinniest phone and incremental battery life updates per generation instead. It's pathetic that everyone just accepts that this is the best they can do.
 
Yeah, so, now imagine the Air but double the battery (like I originally said). A phone that would be close to 24hrs normal use, or close to 54hrs offline video.
Heck, go even further and make a similar phone but get rid of the camera bump (nobody I know likes a camera bump) by putting a healthy amount of battery in it instead.

Go back to the days when a phone could easily last the whole day and then some. But no, gotta keep going for the skinniest phone and incremental battery life updates per generation instead. It's pathetic that everyone just accepts that this is the best they can do.
Said phone would also be ungodly thick and heavy, and then people would complain about how unwieldly it is. We're talking about an 11mm thick phone here (doubling the air's 5.6mm thickness). That's roughly what my moto z play, with its biggest battery back, measure in at, and that was a brick of a phone. And it didnt light the markets on fire. Every time some manufacturer builds a phone with a mega battery....it fails.

Also, "back in the day" phones did not last 24 hours. The best only had 4-5 hours of actual use in them, but their standby time was measured in weeks. By that metric.....the iphone air has the battery life you are looking for. No phone was actually running, screen on, 24 hours straight back in the day. Or ever, really.
 
Last edited:
Love how Apple basically created a titanium fortress with a single camera and mono audio. It’s like buying a tank that comes with bicycle brakes. Looking forward to the Air v3 in a few years though.
 
I'd like to go back to the original iPhone SE size phone.... but hardly anyone would buy it. I am not a media consumer on my mobile so I'm niche.
 
Said phone would also be ungodly thick and heavy, and then people would complain about how unwieldly it is. We're talking about an 11mm thick phone here (doubling the air's 5.6mm thickness). That's roughly what my moto z play, with its biggest battery back, measure in at, and that was a brick of a phone. And it didnt light the markets on fire. Every time some manufacturer builds a phone with a mega battery....it fails.
1. My current phone is almost 10mm, and it is not anywhere close to being ungodly thick and heavy. Having a ridiculous camera bump certainly makes things more unwieldy though lol
2. Doubling the battery size doesn't double the phone size. That's.. not how that works 🤦‍♂️. The current battery isn't 5.6mm thick lol
3. Battery and CPU tech have evolved since your almost 10 year old Moto Z Play. The Air shows they could easily do it.

Also, "back in the day" phones did not last 24 hours. The best only had 4-5 hours of actual use in them, but their standby time was measured in weeks. By that metric.....the iphone air has the battery life you are looking for. No phone was actually running, screen on, 24 hours straight back in the day. Or ever, really.
Some of my early phones lasted days on end on a single charge, and I was using them throughout the day. They might not have sported a big touchscreen, but not having to worry where to find a place to charge it in the middle of my day was certainly a nice thing to have. And then my aging Key2 still lasts the whole day and more (I did personally do 1 battery swap). Lets not pretend guaranteeing all day battery life is still out of reach.
These current flagships are only getting back to all day battery life now (I think?). But I still see and hear people with their battery anxiety and it's a little sad.
 
Last edited:
Back