A big point of contention with Zen 4 CPUs is that they run very hot. AMD says it's all by design, but how about we throw a basic air cooler to see if the 7600X throttles when under load?
A big point of contention with Zen 4 CPUs is that they run very hot. AMD says it's all by design, but how about we throw a basic air cooler to see if the 7600X throttles when under load?
Not blind only the perf graphs are there.Don't if I'm blind, but are the power and temp graphs missing?
In the HWUB video on youtube I think with eco mode the 7600x ran at 94c with the spire and at 77c with the aio in R23 multi core.The perf loss from running in 65w mode really begs the question why that isnt the STNADARD mode. Is that 1~% really worth all the extra wattage? I'd think itd be a much more impressive launch if a 65 watt part came out and still beat the 200+ watt core i9.
Not blind only the perf graphs are there.
This has always been the case for all platforms when using air cooling. I don't see this being anything new. Nobody is really planning to run a high end CPU and graphics card and not be running a proper case fan configuration.With an air cooler you'll need to ensure that you have sufficient exhaust fans to pull that heat away from the other components and out of the case.
While the chip can run at 95C just fine, my concern with an air-cooler is that you're dumping a lot of that heat into the case. At least with an AIO or water cooled system you can exhaust that heat directly out of the case. With an air cooler you'll need to ensure that you have sufficient exhaust fans to pull that heat away from the other components and out of the case. It would be interesting to see what the internal case temps are for various cooling systems.
That was my first thought about that 95c temp. If it can handle that, can I go full Passive cooling and still keep the performance?I would still grind the hell of that IHS until it only it stands out from the loading mechanism like 0.5mm. Just enough for cooler contact. Of course same reduction fom cooler mount height.
I'm sure 1.5-2mm can be safely removed from IHS height and with better heat transfer from IHS to cooler.
In fact I was thinking to do this for the Zen3 I have now, but I will buy a older AM4 cpu for initial tests.
Der Bauer is the only tech guy on YT I trust from now on, the rest had taken the bite from AMD.
"We design it to run at 95C", if that's so maybe someone will run the cpu without cooling. Should have the same perf as with Spire HSF.
Based on....what, exactly? Intel CPUs in laptops have been running at 90c+ for a decade now without issue.According to Agner Fog, running a CPU at any temperature above 50 degrees Celsius will shorten its lifespan. I downloaded AMD's tools to put my Ryzen 9 3900X into Eco Mode, but I couldn't find any setting to cause it to slow down as necessary to ensure the temperature goes no higher than 50 degrees C.
Temperature is not heat. Just because the CPU is running at 95c does not mean that the thermal load it places onto its cooler is higher then before. In Eco mode the 7600x is comparable to a 5600 in power draw, and thus thermal dissipation.My take on this is that the CPU can be configured to run at lower temps with the right cooling. As another commenter asked, why isn't that the default? Personally, unless I am trying to do some overclocking, I don't want to have to mess around with all these settings and potential instability.
While the chip can run at 95C just fine, my concern with an air-cooler is that you're dumping a lot of that heat into the case. At least with an AIO or water cooled system you can exhaust that heat directly out of the case. With an air cooler you'll need to ensure that you have sufficient exhaust fans to pull that heat away from the other components and out of the case. It would be interesting to see what the internal case temps are for various cooling systems.
base and boost for the 2 chiplet processors are 170 and 230w, respectively.What TDP AMD claims for that ~220W usage? I am guessing 105W, right?
Yes, that's been the case, but how many people are running CPUs in the mid-90s? Maybe the current set-up isn't sufficient? And, moving air across the CPU to keep it in that 90 degree range might not be enough to keep other components within their rated temps, if the hot exhaust is flowing over those components. Hence why I think an AIO might be a better solution.This has always been the case for all platforms when using air cooling. I don't see this being anything new. Nobody is really planning to run a high end CPU and graphics card and not be running a proper case fan configuration.
Or if they do, then they shouldn't be surprised when they have thermal issues.
Yes, that's been the case, but how many people are running CPUs in the mid-90s? Maybe the current set-up isn't sufficient? And, moving air across the CPU to keep it in that 90 degree range might not be enough to keep other components within their rated temps, if the hot exhaust is flowing over those components. Hence why I think an AIO might be a better solution.
I ran my 5900X with a Noctua NH-U9S for a little while. Small little 92mm fan heatsink (setup with a push/pull), it worked pretty well with my setup. The 5900X would flirt with 90C when I had it running long sessions of handbrake, but otherwise with gaming temps stayed in the mid 70s. When funds were available I moved to a H100i AIO cooler and now temps for long sessions on handbrake usually tops out about 78C.
I see no reason why some of these new AMD CPUs (7600/7700) would have issues being ran with a decent air cooler, as long as you have a decent tower with proper air flow.
I agree with all your points, but the reality of modern tech media is that getting your review out on the day the NDA lifts is a business necessity given that most clicks will happen on the day of the review. If they delayed the review by 1-2 days to fit in extra testing (testing with an air cooler and AIO would have doubled the number of test points), then most people would have got their Zen 4 review fix elsewhere, leaving much lower traffic for TechSpot."What shocked us was how well the 7600X worked with the Wraith Spire. '
How about starting your tests with a decent air cooler and then going full blast AIO next time??
Not everybody loves to spend a pretty penny on AIOs / deal with leaky tubes sometime down the road.
"it's also important to note that the 95C results shown for Zen 4 CPUs are recorded running stressful all-core workloads and don't apply to any gaming situation.t's also important to note that the 95C results shown for Zen 4 CPUs are recorded running stressful all-core workloads and don't apply to any gaming situation"
AND why do you assume everybody will be running 24/7 things like Blender, Cinebench, etc....and then you start issuing dire warning about temperatures!!
Heck, your own tests showed us now that the lowly Wraith Spire could be enough for many of us!!
Eh? This isn't how thermodynamics works. A CPU encased in a theoretical infinite-sized block of copper would be cooled far better than any possible combination of air-cooled heatsinks.No matter how good thermal conductivity a material has (the IHS) it will fail the energy transfer after a certain thickness is reached and act more like an insulator.