That will never happen with an open source OS.LOL. if you think it'll ever take off n the world use it, you are living in a fantasy land.
Also Linux has been around awhile. But until they ever figure out one and only version, it'll never been anything other than DIY desktop.
I've got something like that going on with one of my PCs. Update happens, reboot to blue screen without any usable log data, then reverts to the version before the update while telling me its doing me a favor. And it's not anything out of the ordinary - A socket 2011 Ivy Bridge Xeon, 32GB ram, 980Ti, SSD, Sound Blaster Z. Of course, the MS Help was "Reinstall the OS"Could kinda do with the update on mine that keeps rolling back fixing first. For quite a while now it has been trying to install it. There is no useful error message displayed, I assume it has reported back each time it has failed. This is on a Dell XPS15 not a rare or unusual configuration. I am not looking forward to the "next big thing".
How ironic that you pretend to know so much yet you didnt really provided any real info as to why what I said is wrong. Or worse, me wasting time feeding a "professional" retired high school debater captain.What does that have to do with the Linux kernel being "tech from the 70s."?
I see so many logical fallacies on this website that I fell like many people here know so little about tech that they should just switch to templeOS
Your opinion may or may not prove itself out in time. The way I see it is the layered approach is another vector that hackers will figure out how to exploit at some point. It could also be so that google can inject more spyware functions at any point in the layers.That said, what I meant with my original comment, the main design philosophy of Linux, which is the same as Unix, its simply not that good compared to something like Zircon in Fuschia.
I get that Google has that reputation and I would say is well deserved, but You should look as to how bad Windows 10 in this regard.Your opinion may or may not prove itself out in time. The way I see it is the layered approach is another vector that hackers will figure out how to exploit at some point. It could also be so that google can inject more spyware functions at any point in the layers.
I am sure google had their reasons for taking this approach with, IMO, the most likely reason being that felt that it would give them more opportunity to monetize and/or maximize the monetization of the data they collect. Whether it proves to be better in practice remains to be seen.
From google's past behavior, one thing is certain - at least as I see it, that is google lines it pockets, at least in part, by selling data that it has collected.
This would be an amazing gift to Apple.
Microsoft is already struggling to keep Windows together with tape and baling wire.
Windows runs on obsolete, inefficient and hot-running X86 chips that deliver increasingly poor performance versus Apple’s modern M-series SOCs that are faster, more efficient and lower cost.
And Windows itself is a bloated, inefficient OS with a poor user experience.
About the only argument left for Windows is cost — “sure, it sucks but it is cheap!”
If they go to a subscription model, people will end up paying Microsoft $100 or so a year, turning those $800 Windows laptops into $1,300 laptops when you factor in the software.
That costs more than a MacBook Air and the same as a MacBook Pro — which gives you vastly superior industrial design, a much more stable and usable OS, and of course Apple’s cutting-edge M-series SOC architecture.
Along with an OS that doesn’t require regular payments to remain up-to-date.
The Mac is the desktop counterpart to the mobile OS that most serious smartphone users deploy — iOS. Which will further drive migration away from Windows.
In Google-land, things would also improve quite a bit from a Windows money-grab. Chromebooks integrate well with Google services and Android, and many people will be giving serious consideration to Chrome OS as their next laptop environment.
We could be seeing Windows’ final days.
Linux Distros make for great Server OS. But it is a poor platform for normal users. Once you get past the shell linux really shows how bad it is as a platform, and really the GUI is nothing more than a secondary feature.How ironic that you pretend to know so much yet you didnt really provided any real info as to why what I said is wrong. Or worse, me wasting time feeding a "professional" retired high school debater captain.
That said, what I meant with my original comment, the main design philosophy of Linux, which is the same as Unix, its simply not that good compared to something like Zircon in Fuschia.
Talking about it, moving away from the Linux kernel helps with following:
1- drivers and thus OS updates. Linux refuses to ensure backward compatibility, and Qualcomm refuses to work on older chipsets. Android is getting retrofitted a kind-of-HAL (hardware Abstraction Layer) between Linux and drivers, but Zircon has been built from the ground up with that in mind.
2- lotsa other stuff: security, modularity, speed, modernity...
And in the end, Linux is really just the kernel, is is GNU\Linux, and as it was copied/inspired by Unix, which was a server OS, with emphasis on multiuser, not security.
Anyways, feel free to continue with the insults and juvenile attempt at humilliating someone online because..
Or you could just buy a machine that doesn’t require pointless “maintenance” to prevent serious problems.Exactly. But don't cry about it, you choose to use it.
You can choose not to maintain a device. Don't connect to internet then. But if you do then there are and will be rules that you agreed to. Doesn't matter if you like them or not. If they bother you or anyone so much talk with the manufacturer. Or simply use a different device.
Gaming rigs are not a major driver of PC volumes. Far more Playstations, XBoxes and Switches are sold than gaming rigs.Lol... show me some evidence to back that up... as for no one developing for Windows... hmmmm... what’s one of the (if not the) most profitable computer industry? Video Games... and last I heard, Windows was a pretty important thing to develop them for... (remember, Xbox basically runs Windows too)...
Windows is still hugely relevant, don’t pretend otherwise...
There isn't one. Never has been.Or you could just buy a machine that doesn’t require pointless “maintenance” to prevent serious problems.
Sure there is. I use one today.There isn't one. Never has been.
OSX and iOS are distinct platforms. You are completely ignoring this fact.Depends on how you define “desktop.” Mac OS runs on laptops, and Apple laptops are the world’s best for average users. iOS, Mac OS, and iPad OS are all scaled to meet different form factors while sharing a modern hardware architecture (Apple A and M series SOCs) and cloud infrastructure. Macs with M-series chips can run iPad and iPhone apps.
If you count all the devices running in the Apple ecosystem — Mac, iPad and iPhone — Apple is far more important than Microsoft these days.
I suspect “new Windows” is an attempt to milk folks trapped with legacy applications, and that Microsoft knows Windows has no real future. This move will allow them to monetize Windows for as long as possible, and the people who switch to Apple or Google OSes will still be paying Microsoft for cloud services (including Office 365), so MS wins no matter what.
Meanwhile the world can finally move on from X86, the Windows registry, and all the legacy Windows goop that has stood in the way of modern computing.
Yep he's utterly delusional...Lol... show me some evidence to back that up... as for no one developing for Windows... hmmmm... what’s one of the (if not the) most profitable computer industry? Video Games... and last I heard, Windows was a pretty important thing to develop them for... (remember, Xbox basically runs Windows too)...
Windows is still hugely relevant, don’t pretend otherwise...
Xbox uses Windows.... try again...Gaming rigs are not a major driver of PC volumes. Far more Playstations, XBoxes and Switches are sold than gaming rigs.
And the big games are sold on all those platforms as well as Windows. Far from exclusive to Windows.
Shoeboxes don’t count.... nor do soap boxes...Sure there is. I use one today.
That’s an arbitrary distinction. My Mac OS laptop runs iOS apps. My iOS device has an API that allows Mac apps to be easily ported — the iWork suite for iOS is an example of this.OSX and iOS are distinct platforms. You are completely ignoring this fact.
OSX is the Apple desktop platform and that is what has failed (if you think the goal is to be dominant market share). Clear now?
And let me be clear. As an engineer, I would design a closed eco like Apple has done. From an engineering perspective, it is the cleaner way to do things. x86/x64 Windows is a monster but a highly successful monster. Those are the facts.
iOS is the portable operating system and a subset of the desktop eco capabilities and in some respects like UI, it is its own beast. It can be shoehorned into a lot of traditional roles for desktop but it is it's own segment for very good reason.
No it doesn’t. It uses some tech derived from Windows, but it does not run Windows. People don’t buy xboxes to get Windows — which it doesn’t run — they buy them to play games on a specialized device.Xbox uses Windows.... try again...
The Xbox One, in fact, already runs Windows 10. However, the version of Windows 10 on the Xbox One is a highly customized version of Windows 10 specific to the Xbox One consoleNo it doesn’t. It uses some tech derived from Windows, but it does not run Windows. People don’t buy xboxes to get Windows — which it doesn’t run — they buy them to play games on a specialized device.
Yes, it does.... just a customized one...No it doesn’t. It uses some tech derived from Windows, but it does not run Windows. People don’t buy xboxes to get Windows — which it doesn’t run — they buy them to play games on a specialized device.