Microsoft plans to capture carbon using crushed limestone

Daniel Sims

Posts: 1,376   +43
Staff
Why it matters: Microsoft's ambitious efforts to eliminate its carbon footprint involve lowering emissions and removing carbon from the atmosphere. The emerging carbon capture industry is attempting numerous methods, one of which involves rocks that naturally absorb the substance, but that carbon still has to go somewhere.

Microsoft has struck a deal with Heirloom Carbon, a startup that has developed a process for using limestone to capture carbon to fight climate change. The technique could contribute to Microsoft's ongoing attempt to become carbon-negative.

Limestone naturally absorbs carbon over many years, but Heirloom's method accelerates the process. The company uses a kiln powered by renewable energy to heat crushed limestone to around 1,650 degrees Fahrenheit, which separates it into carbon dioxide and calcium oxide. Adding water to the calcium oxide allows it to absorb sufficient amounts of carbon within days, after which Heirloom re-inserts it into the kiln to restart the cycle.

Although the technology is proven, the maximum scale at which it remains cost-effective is unclear. Another issue facing all carbon capture methods is storing the substance.

Heirloom permanently buries the separated carbon underground, but other groups are trying to recycle it for practical uses. CarbonCure has developed a process to transform carbon dioxide into a mineral for concrete. The group claims that concrete mixed with CO2, which replaces some of the cement, is no weaker than typical building material. Furthermore, the concrete traps the carbon forever, even if a building made with it collapses or is demolished.

Regardless of the limestone method's effectiveness, it will likely need to complement other carbon capture technologies that Microsoft is employing to become carbon-negative by 2030. A few years ago, the company also said that by 2050, it wants to remove all of the carbon it has ever emitted since its 1975 founding.

One of the most well-known removal methods involves massive vacuum-like machines that suck carbon from the open atmosphere. However, the equipment is costly. Microsoft has also partnered with the ocean restoration company Running Tide, which uses algae and limestone to trap CO2 in the ocean. The technique places the materials on buoys hundreds of miles offshore, gradually disintegrating as they collect carbon. Eventually, they sink to the ocean floor, where natural processes prevent the CO2 from re-entering the atmosphere for hundreds or millions of years.

Permalink to story.

 
Because capturing carbon by planting trees is just too damn hard........

One of the most well-known removal methods involves massive vacuum-like machines that suck carbon from the open atmosphere
Yes that sounds very Monty Burns doesn't it. Also would that not possibly cause our plants and food sources to weaken and get sick? Because they actually require carbon dioxide to grow........
 
What is this, an April 1st article? Limestone is Calcium Carbonate, CaCO3. If you heat it enough, it will expel carbon dioxide, CO2 leaving quicklime, CaO. That is capable of absorbing carbon dioxide, CaO + CO2 => CaCO3 and you're back to where you started except you've used up some energy. This is the principle behind cement. I cannot see how this will help in any way whatsoever.
 
If they cared about the environment, they wouldn't be forcing the early retirement of tens of millions of functional PCs to push a pointless TPM 2.0 and esoteric processor restrictions for windows 11.

Anything that runs 10 runs 11. This will cause unnecessary CO2 output via forcing functional PCs to be replaced.
 
What is this, an April 1st article? Limestone is Calcium Carbonate, CaCO3. If you heat it enough, it will expel carbon dioxide, CO2 leaving quicklime, CaO. That is capable of absorbing carbon dioxide, CaO + CO2 => CaCO3 and you're back to where you started except you've used up some energy. This is the principle behind cement. I cannot see how this will help in any way whatsoever.
Even if they had some top secret stuff to somehow 1) Deal with the CO2 created to absorb CO2 later and 2) Do it without the CO2 that's currently required to heat well, pretty much anything anyway, What would the end result be?

I bet it would be Microsoft not even able to offset their own carbon footprint from ChatGPT let alone other AI initiatives they're no doubt have on the works because most of that 'AI' stuff is going to be done by 'Nvidia GPU goes BRRR!!! UNLIMITED POWER!!!!' anyway.
 
If they cared about the environment, they wouldn't be forcing the early retirement of tens of millions of functional PCs to push a pointless TPM 2.0 and esoteric processor restrictions for windows 11.

Anything that runs 10 runs 11. This will cause unnecessary CO2 output via forcing functional PCs to be replaced.
Speaking of win 11. I have seen tests, I know that in theory it is not supposed to make hardware that ran win 10 to run noticeably slower.
But my perfectly fine laptop running windows 10 got slower, much slower.
I was disappointed to find out about it.
Windows 11 does not even offer that many features to justify overburdening older hardware.
 
It's all crap. For everything the US and other countries restrict themselves for, and make things more expensive for everyone, China and Russia are building the hell out of coal power plants and making things cheaper.
 
:rolleyes: I would not be surprised if this is some dumb-a$$ marketing campaign on M$'s part to try to appear "green" in light of the vast amounts of energy and water that their AI and ChatGPT waste.
It's all crap. For everything the US and other countries restrict themselves for, and make things more expensive for everyone, China and Russia are building the hell out of coal power plants and making things cheaper.
Not to worry! US Companies are making up for that with AI and its vast energy and water use.
 
Back