Microsoft president says AI backlash at graduation events should be wake-up call for the tech industry

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 2,581   +968
Staff
Humans Matter: The ever-growing financial investments in AI development have so far caused two major reactions. Some people see AI as a ruinous technology that will drag everything down, while others are still keeping their optimistic view of the traditional evolution cycle of computer technology. Brad Smith definitely belongs to the latter, although he is asking his colleagues to have a closer look at how "normals" are expressing their dissatisfaction with the current state of the (tech) world.

Microsoft president and vice chairman Brad Smith recently shared his – definitely informed – opinion about the growing backlash against AI. Smith thinks that other leaders in the industry should listen when people express their disdain for "pro-AI" speakers attending graduation events. Smith believes that they should take the backlash as a significant wake-up call, because younger generations have always been the most eager early adopters of the latest technology products and trends.

Tech executives are definitely loving the concept that AI will revolutionize everything – although they might overestimate its capabilities because of what Box's CEO called AI psychosis. At the other end of the spectrum, students who have completed their education are now looking at an increasingly complex job market.

Some executives have so far proposed AI as a transformative technology that is going to profoundly reshape the workforce. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei famously said that LLMs and chatbots are going to erase half of entry-level white-collar jobs within the next five years, while Microsoft AI chief Mustafa Suleyman stated that "most" white-collar jobs will be taken by AI over the next 12 to 18 months.

Smith said that graduates are definitely recognizing the benefits of AI, but they want to keep it where an automation technology should belong. They want agency over chatbots, and they want to decide the future role of machines for themselves and not the other way around.

Microsoft's president is even trying to revive the concept of the "American Dream," stating that the dignity of work has always given life meaning and purpose.

"To those in the tech sector who seemingly want to pursue a future where computers replace jobs and AI becomes more capable than people, the next generation of people has offered a compelling response: 'not so fast,'" Smith said in his post.

Microsoft's stance appears to align with the recent shift in tone in pro-AI enthusiasm coming from technology leaders. CEOs of AI corporations are trying to highlight the potential benefits of automation technology, arguing that it will make workers more productive and efficient rather than simply replacing them.

Smith still thinks that AI is a transformative technology, an evolutionary leap that's going to have significant implications for both individuals and organizations over the next few years. However, he also thinks that Microsoft is going to play a major role in this transformation, just like it did with the personal computer revolution.

"Workers have been Microsoft's lifeblood from the start. If the world's people don't have jobs, then neither do we," he said.

Permalink to story:

 
For a company that is so top heavy on promoting ai and marketing how great it is, it shouldn't have anything struggling in it's portfolio especially gaming. Few articles down Xbox is struggling. Not only are workers being replaced apparently anything weighing down the machine as well.
 
Last edited:
It's making everything more expensive and contributing very little to society as a whole. Outside of a few niche applications like AlphaFold, AI is just slop. I like "vibe coding" when I'm prototyping or just doing some personal project, but it's pretty useless professionally. It is pretty good for things like "search my email for that message from X about Y and Z" and it can save me maybe two hours a week of I'm being generous.

But I'm really not seeing the AI revolution where it turns the world into a utopia that we are constantly being sold on. If anything, the only truly profitable applications for AI currently are military weapons and mass surveillance. That, I would argue, is AI turing the world into a dystopia, not a utopia
 
AI "backlash" at graduation events is just certain unable-to-fit individuals feeling unhappy about the state of the world.
It does not mean anything, it's not a wake-up call, just spoiled brats whining.
 
It's making everything more expensive and contributing very little to society as a whole. Outside of a few niche applications like AlphaFold, AI is just slop. I like "vibe coding" when I'm prototyping or just doing some personal project, but it's pretty useless professionally. It is pretty good for things like "search my email for that message from X about Y and Z" and it can save me maybe two hours a week of I'm being generous.

But I'm really not seeing the AI revolution where it turns the world into a utopia that we are constantly being sold on. If anything, the only truly profitable applications for AI currently are military weapons and mass surveillance. That, I would argue, is AI turing the world into a dystopia, not a utopia
I find it useful professionally in my data science work, but it requires so much direction, oversight, review, etc that I agree, the value it brings is not worth the investments going into all the data centers and chips. At the current rate I don't see it replacing employees though, because AI will soon have to be expensive to justify all that investment, and then employees will be cheaper.
 
Wow, college students are against something? Yeah… I’m sure the powers that be will be looking seriously at changing their ways…. /s

AI is in its infancy… give it a few years and ask yourself what you’d be doing without it…
 
Microsoft's president is even trying to revive the concept of the "American Dream," stating that the dignity of work has always given life meaning and purpose.

This is a very ignorant thing to say to young adult today. I know he's just a mouthpiece, but they need a smarter one with more awareness.
 
I'd argue it's not even approaching infancy yet. The science is not there. However, the money spent says it's fully mature.
While Google's transformer architecture was a breakthrough, pieces are missing: analogues of faculties of the brain, real-time training, persistent state, and perhaps the sense modalities. Then, the compute/energy barrier, a new substrate being needed, not throwing more GPUs at the problem. Finally, the hard riddle has to be answered: what functional advantage did consciousness/sentience confer on life? Does it enable actions impossible under a non-sentient framework? If true, it will have to be reverse engineered and implemented to reach "true AI."

The last part is important because if we do not possess a verified theory of consciousness, we would not be able to distinguish true AI from the philosophical zombie, leading to a moral quagmire.
 
Last edited:
I think we need some real guard rails on where AI can be used. It should not be allowed to replace human jobs, period. Given the heady cocktail of out-of-control capitalism combined with a corrupt omnishambles administration in the US this wont happen but hopefully the more decent and humanistic European countries will get a handle on it.
 
I think we need some real guard rails on where AI can be used. It should not be allowed to replace human jobs, period. Given the heady cocktail of out-of-control capitalism combined with a corrupt omnishambles administration in the US this wont happen but hopefully the more decent and humanistic European countries will get a handle on it.
No mention of Chinese Ai advancement to that vacuumed claim though.
 
While Google's transformer architecture was a breakthrough, pieces are missing: analogues of faculties of the brain, real-time training, persistent state, and perhaps the sense modalities. Then, the compute/energy barrier, a new substrate being needed, not throwing more GPUs at the problem. Finally, the hard riddle has to be answered: what functional advantage did consciousness/sentience confer on life? Does it enable actions impossible under a non-sentient framework? If true, it will have to be reverse engineered and implemented to reach "true AI."

The last part is important because if we do not possess a verified theory of consciousness, we would not be able to distinguish true AI from the philosophical zombie, leading to a moral quagmire.

You are aware that nothing made is actually “AI” right? They’re all just LLMs spitting out kinda relevant information about a query.
 
The "AI will take jobs" is just a greed-driven scare tactic driven by Microslop and other big tech firms. They astroturf "AI is coming for your job" and then they lay off a bunch of people, and those who remain work even harder because they're terrified of losing their jobs.
 
Another massively-overprivileged and out of touch 65+ year old old-boys-network chairman making statements based on no real understanding of the issues facing young people and the terrible world they are creating through their greed and selfishness.
 
Another massively-overprivileged and out of touch 65+ year old old-boys-network chairman making statements based on no real understanding of the issues facing young people and the terrible world they are creating through their greed and selfishness.

Just stop it with the anti older male nonsense. Almost everything I learned of real value came from older men who had already been through it. And the same is probably true for women. You learn from elders.
 
Back