Nintendo is selling the Switch 2 at a loss, so investors are asking for a hefty price hike

midian182

Posts: 11,726   +177
Staff member
In brief: Are you concerned that the Nintendo Switch 2 simply isn't expensive enough? Probably not, but it's something that's worrying the company's investors. At a time when component prices are skyrocketing, a report claims the gaming giant is under pressure to increase the price of its handheld, which is being sold at a loss.

Bloomberg notes that apart from a brief uplift in March when Pokémon Pokopia launched, Nintendo's stock price has been on a downward trajectory this year. It started 2026 at $68.15 but is currently at $47.38, a fall of more than 30%.

The stock decline is a worrying sight for Nintendo shareholders, who are calling for the company to raise the Switch 2 price. The device launched in June 2025 with an MSRP of $449.99. There's also a region-locked Japan version that sells for the equivalent of $318. Both of these are said to be sold at a loss, especially the Japan-only model.

We don't know exactly how much Nintendo is losing on each Switch 2 it sells, but the amount is likely substantial. An analyst told Bloomberg that even if Nintendo raised the price by $50 to $100, the console would only become "less of a burden rather than truly profitable."

Many console makers sell their machines at a loss, relying on the likes of game sales, subscriptions, and accessories to make up the difference. After the disastrous Wii U, Nintendo decided to sell the original Switch for a profit, but changed course with the Switch 2 – even though it's $150 more expensive than its predecessor.

This isn't the first time we've heard of a potential Switch 2 price hike. It was reported in February that the company was considering increasing the cost as a result of higher component prices.

In an interview in November 2025, Nintendo President Shuntaro Furukawa promised not to raise the Switch 2 price in 2026, though it came with caveats: the price would remain the same as long as the company did not have to deal with inflationary pressures from increased tariffs or component costs.

The dilemma for Nintendo is that the Switch 2 has hardly struggled to shift units since launch. The company said it had sold 17.37 million devices by the end of December, alongside 37.93 million Switch 2 games, while quarterly profit jumped 23% thanks to the new hardware. But strong demand won't mean much to investors if AI-fueled memory costs and tariff risks keep eating into margins.

Permalink to story:

 
I have doubts of Nintendo selling the Switch 2 at a loss, with the old hardware it has, and Switch 2 game cards are $70 but don't store an entire game.
 
And the software sales lately have been...disappointing as well. Which continues to prove what a lot of us have argued: Nintendo would be FAR better off going the Sega route and going third party.
 
The whole point of consoles is that you sucker people in with a low initial cost, then hit them with higher game prices + nickle and dime them other ways, like online connection fees. Selling the initial console at a minor loss is fine. Nintendo just needs to get out more games that people want to buy, and get more third parties releases games on the Switch 2 as well.
 
Why would you want a lower refresh rate than the current LCD screen?
because the 120Hz LCD is ... not what you would expect. It accepts 120Hz as a refresh rate, but it does not drive the pixels fast enough and it blurs the image. It is believed that they do not employ overdrive in order to save power and thus 120Hz is just in the spec sheet. the pixels have a response time of about 27ms which equates to 37fps and a bit worse than the switch1 21ms.
https://www.techspot.com/article/3006-nintendo-switch-2-display/
 
Actually the Switch 2 is overpriced based on the hardware specs it offers. Heck even the Xbox Series S has better hardware and that came out over 5 years ago.

A portable gaming console has lower specs than a 200W current-gen wall-powered console? Wow crazy times. Since when have Nintendo consoles sold on specs? They sell on gameplay and portability.
 
A portable gaming console has lower specs than a 200W current-gen wall-powered console? Wow crazy times. Since when have Nintendo consoles sold on specs? They sell on gameplay and portability.
A wall powered console that was obsolete when it came out 6 years ago. Let me blow your socks off: the switch 2 is more powerful then the Xbox one or ps4.
 
I am having a blast with my Switch 2, mostly because I'm casually playing Switch 1 games. I bought Shinobi and TMNT: Splintered Fate and haven't really gotten into them yet because I'll wait till I'm on my long-haul flight to Vietnam and need something to do. I was waiting for the Contra collection to go on sale - already bought the Gradius collection. When they get really dirt cheap I may rebuy the Mega Man collections but I'll definitely need more storage space by then.

Switch 2 is my way of reliving my NES and SNES days. I don't care for the new games.
 
As a switch 2 owner (got it for the kid for christmas) I can confirm that this console is a piece of garbage that's not even worth it's current asking price.

- No adaptive sync support at all in tv mode

- Any games that actually have a split screen mode for 2 players completely prison pockets the performance, and with no adaptive sync, dropping into the 20 fps range, even on an oled feels like complete trash. go play hyrule warriors or whatever that game is with your kid and you'll see. can't imagine what something like cyberpunk or hogwarts runs like.

- $80 games, $100 controllers, $100+ micro sd cards.

- Still can't even give us a built in DVD Player let alone something that's actually current technology. Make the dock fit a DVD Player. I don't care, figure it out.

- LCD before OLED release scam as usual.

- Somehow consoles still get away with making you pay for your own internet again if you want to use your own internet with the console...lol? how was this ever legal?

A price increase? For..what exactly? You do realize your console has the GPU equivalent of an RTX 2050 right? I think that's worth a hot $50 honestly, so wtf are your trying to justify a price increase with? Your still terribly designed joycons that you never fixed from the first switch so they're all going to fail eventually? Excluding adaptive sync when many tvs run at 120 fps yet most of your games only support 60, let alone tvs locked at 60 playing one of them AAA bangers at 30 fps? Are you remedial?

Seriously, get the f*ck out.
 
Last edited:
Careful, Nintendo investors. This is not r/WallStreetBets. The "Big N" is not AMC or GameStop, or Bed Bath & Beyond. This is not a casino. You're playing the long game.

If the goal is an overnight 1,000x increase in your portfolio, you choose poorly.
 
Why would you want a lower refresh rate than the current LCD screen?
Because it will still make 120 Hz LCD look bad. In both visuals and motion. But sure I would take 120 Hz OLED, 90 Hz would be fine tho, as long as it is OLED.

Also, the console can't do anywhere close to 90 fps in handheld mode anyway. 30-60 fps is the norm. How many games runs 120 fps in handheld mode? How is battery with 120 fps you think?

OLED has top tier motion clarity. 90 Hz OLED has vastly better motion clarity than 120 Hz LCD and the LCD panel on Switch 2 is literally one of the worst LCD panels ever made.

Sad but true. Switch 1 OLED looks next gen compared to Switch 2 in terms of image quality too.




As you can see, this is not a secret.
 
They should! But I'm saying this out of spite hoping the company crashes and burns - so probably not advice they should take.

Tablets that get sold in much smaller numbers but hardware wise are in the same ballpark get sold for far less - how would Nintendo that holds much more of the supply line in its own hands make a big loss on the Switch? Of the people I know that had the Switch 1 none of them were even excited for the Switch 2 (tbf, mainly due to most games being underwhelming - especially the Pokémon ones), they still got one of course but weren't impressed even with with tempered expectations in the first place. Don't see them buying another at an even higher price for the kids - they'll just hand over their own and keep themselves entertained in other ways.

Surprised they aren't doing the typical 'modern' thing and just shoving more ads into the UI wherever they can.

 
Back