Nvidia's 100-hour GeForce Now cap hits all users next month - here's how expensive it gets

midian182

Posts: 11,636   +176
Staff member
A hot potato: The 100-hour monthly playtime cap Nvidia introduced on GeForce Now in January will expand to all members next month. Users can buy 15-hour blocks of time if they need extra, so a Redditor has created a helpful chart showing how much you'll spend based on daily playtime and what tier you're on.

Nvidia introduced the 100-hour GeForce Now monthly cap for new members at the start of the year. Existing paid members received unlimited playtime until January 1, 2026.

Team Green said that the restriction will allow the service to continue providing "unparalleled quality and speed – as well as short or no queue times – for all paid members, without increasing membership fees." It's definitely not about making even more money, obviously.

Those on the $9.99 per month Performance tier can pay $2.99 for a block of 15 hours if they use up their time allotment, while those on the Ultimate tier have to pay $5.99 for every 15-hour block. The free tier doesn't have the cap, but those users are limited to one-hour sessions, less powerful hardware, and often have to endure long waits.

Redditor appleroyales created a helpful chart to show just how many hours of daily play you can get from GeForce Now before costs start getting close to the price of a full PC - and higher.

The chart shows that playing 3 hours per day will average around 91 hours per month, meaning the base costs aren't going to change. However, if you increase that to 4 hours per day, or about 122 hours per month, and the Performance tier price jumps to $15.97 and Ultimate goes up to $31.97.

Adding more hours to every day's playtime sees the monthly costs spiral quickly. 5 hours a day costs $21.95 on Performance and $43.95 on Ultimate, while 6 hours per day is $27.93/$55.93.

Appleroyales included the 1, 5, and 10 year total costs for each tier and daily playtime amounts. Six hours per day on the Ultimate tier comes to $671 a year, around the same amount as a PS5 Pro and the expected price of the upcoming Steam Machine. Five years at this level will resulting in total spending of $2,637 on the Ultimate tier, roughly the same as a higher-end PC.

Most GeForce Now customers aren't going to play this many hours per month, of course. Nvidia previously said that only 6% of people use the service for more than 3 hours every day on average. But the chart does show how quickly the costs can add up.

GeForce Now lets users stream games they already own on Nvidia GPUs --those on the Ultimate tier get access to RTX 5080 GPUs. You can check out our previous feature – created before the playtime cap – to help decide if it's worth it.

Permalink to story:

 
And that’s why Microsoft / Nvidia / Amazon / Google / everyone and their mums are trying to convince gamers to use cloud streaming as the future.

Just like game subscription services, they don’t do it to save you money, they do it to take more money from you.

Latency isn’t good enough for multiplayer games, so that keeps game streaming from ever becoming the mainstream option on a technical level, but it’ll also cost you more in the long run as well.
 
They had something quite nice going - and then the greed train ran over it. Capping that service eliminates the transition to cloud gaming permanently.
We need more players in the market for hardware options going forward
 
Did people expect the best game streaming service by far, to be 100% free?

Google Stadia was a pure joke in comparison, and dried out.

Cloud gaming is for casuals and this won't change anytime soon, if ever.

Even with 1+ Gbit fiber, wired ethernet and a high-end PC you will feel the latency and see the compression artifacts.

Most people using garbage hardware, have crappy internet as well, leading to an even worse experience. Most "casuals" even use Wi-Fi, slow and dated Wi-Fi that is.

However Geforce Now works quite good and nothing even comes close. Tried it many times over the years.
 
Yeah, no. I'm sitting at the capital city's main Internet hub, my ping to Google is 1 ms (yes, I'm serious) yet GN tells me even before it starts that I might experience lags.

And indeed I do. It's unplayable.

If this is the future of gaming, I'll just stop being a gamer then.
 
Yeah, no. I'm sitting at the capital city's main Internet hub, my ping to Google is 1 ms (yes, I'm serious) yet GN tells me even before it starts that I might experience lags.

And indeed I do. It's unplayable.

If this is the future of gaming, I'll just stop being a gamer then.
Streaming will never overcome physics, unless they figure out how to make wormholes.
While having 92% marketshare.

Lets hope AMD and Intel can gain a few percent over the next years
All they have to do is not screw up, and that is a tall order for them. Both AMD and intel have committed multiple faux pas with driver and software support this year alone. AMD specifically seems determined to destroy whatever goodwill they come across, and intel is dead set on moving at a snails pace (wonder if they regret Raja yet?).

IMO AMD already has the better drivers stability wise then nVidia now, and far superior to intel, but their constant insistence on screwing over older customers and a refusal to release a proper product stack really undermine their efforts.
 
Eh, I'm only gaming about 20-30 hours a month now and I have only been playing CRPGs the last few years (Bauldgers gate3 and Rouge trade. It's kinda fun that way because these games can provide hundreds of hours of gameplay and I get to spend months spending time in these worlds whether I'm gaming or just thinking about them in my head when I'm bored at work.

And these prices aren't that bad, though I would rather just buy the hardware than have a subscription regardless of performance(assuming latency and stuff were a non issue, too).
 
I've been using geforcenow ever since it was in beta, but even after all these years I just can't see myself paying for it. I've used the ultimate tier on a friends ShieldTV and while it's better, still wouldn't pay for it. The most I used it was for like a year when I sold my GTX1070Ti but couldn't get a new card because of the mining craze. It did make the wait bearable.

I used it last month and it took like 30 minutes to start playing. I don't recall having to wait much longer than that.

It's bar none the very best game streaming service. Unfortunately, that's not saying much.
Even today I wouldn't recommend it for multiplayer gaming, much less competitive multiplayer. While latency has become much better and even at 1080p image quality is pretty good with few compression artifacts if any. I would only use it for casual gaming. Most of my gaming library is available so I have plenty of titles to play.

You don't really need 1gb connection, unless you want to game at 4k or 120fps.

It's not going to replace my gaming PC anytime soon if ever, but at least I can use GeforceNow when my son is playing on the pc.
 
How many have time to game more than 3 hours every day!?!

Or more reasonably 2 hours every weekday and 14 hours on the weekend!?!

Get a job or go outside (or buy a PC).
3 hours isnt that crazy. If you're a single guy, that 3 hours comes between getting home from work and making dinner.

I've been using geforcenow ever since it was in beta, but even after all these years I just can't see myself paying for it. I've used the ultimate tier on a friends ShieldTV and while it's better, still wouldn't pay for it. The most I used it was for like a year when I sold my GTX1070Ti but couldn't get a new card because of the mining craze. It did make the wait bearable.

I used it last month and it took like 30 minutes to start playing. I don't recall having to wait much longer than that.

It's bar none the very best game streaming service. Unfortunately, that's not saying much.
Even today I wouldn't recommend it for multiplayer gaming, much less competitive multiplayer. While latency has become much better and even at 1080p image quality is pretty good with few compression artifacts if any. I would only use it for casual gaming. Most of my gaming library is available so I have plenty of titles to play.

You don't really need 1gb connection, unless you want to game at 4k or 120fps.

It's not going to replace my gaming PC anytime soon if ever, but at least I can use GeforceNow when my son is playing on the pc.
4k geforce now looks worse then 1080p at home due to video compression, and the input lag is infuriating. How people use it I have no idea.
 
Yeah, here's to hoping that instead of gamers flocking to rental services like this, that indies keep pushing low-end-friendly games that make such services much less desirable/necessary. Maybe that'll also help higher-ups realize that just having cutting edge graphics ≠ good game.

Game streaming services have a time and place, but they shouldn't be a complete replacement for ownership.
 
3 hours isnt that crazy. If you're a single guy, that 3 hours comes between getting home from work and making dinner.


4k geforce now looks worse then 1080p at home due to video compression, and the input lag is infuriating. How people use it I have no idea.
I've used it a few times on my friends Shield TV and it just works, no noticeable lag, no visible artifacts and he only has like 100mps internet.
 
A sad single guy. If all one does is work and game, one leads a sad existence.
Dude, don't throw shade on how others choose to live. It doesn't affect you, so let it be.

Personally, it would take me half a year to rack up 100 hrs of gaming these days, but in my single child-free years there would have been a few times I'd hit that limit. And I fully expect that limit to drop in the future as they push for more profit, enshittification is an unstoppable process until a better alternative comes along.
 
A sad single guy. If all one does is work and game, one leads a sad existence.
And being riddled with ridiculous debt and not being able to do nearly anything you consider fun to have a family is the happy existence? I'm sorry son, while I do think 3hrs of gaming/day is a lot, it is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much better of an existence than being stuck in the above situation. Those that like having a family, all the power to em, but for me I like my freedom and if anyone ever told me how I need to do things, I would show em the door instantly, and wouldn't look back as I slam the door behind em.
 
I'd have hit that limit in my peak gaming era. Not because I got that much actual in-game play, but because the game was up and running while paused as I tabbed out, took a call, got called to help with something, and then forgot about it as I got caught up in the next thing. I guess if you subscribe to your hardware you have to be a lot more careful about logging out every time.
 
They want to force you into subscriptions for everything.
The only sure way to project their revenue and profits.
If you care about gaming: NEVER use Cloud services.

Feel free to copy paste this message.
 
And being riddled with ridiculous debt and not being able to do nearly anything you consider fun to have a family is the happy existence? I'm sorry son, while I do think 3hrs of gaming/day is a lot, it is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much better of an existence than being stuck in the above situation. Those that like having a family, all the power to em, but for me I like my freedom and if anyone ever told me how I need to do things, I would show em the door instantly, and wouldn't look back as I slam the door behind em.

If u don't want a family, then having one when u don't want it is the definition of insanity. But there are people that have come to appreciate relationships and family life, and for those people all the power to them. For the people that don't appreciate or understand the point of family, then let them live their life as they see fit. If that means 100 hours of gaming a month, let them do that. There are many ways to escape relationships (family or any other), gaming is just one.
 
To be fair, if you're one of the vast majority of GeForce Now users (and probably gamers in general) you are very likely gaming less than 100 hrs per month. And at that playtime rate, GFN is still a better deal than a good gaming PC in both the short and long term.
 
Back