Oracle layoffs could reach 30,000 as company doubles down on AI

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,010   +58
Staff
What just happened? Oracle is trimming tens of thousands of jobs across its global operations as part of a broader realignment toward AI infrastructure. Employees in the US and India reported receiving termination emails early Tuesday from "Oracle Leadership" stating, "After careful consideration of Oracle's current business needs, we have made the decision to eliminate your role." Affected workers said the notice marked their final day with the company.

The company declined to comment on the total scope of the layoffs, though some estimates suggest they could affect as many as 20,000 to 30,000 workers. Oracle employed about 162,000 people worldwide as of the end of May.

Oracle disclosed in a regulatory filing earlier this year that it would allocate an additional $500 million for restructuring costs during the current fiscal year – an increase that analysts interpreted as a sign that more job cuts were coming.

The latest round of job cuts may have been foreshadowed by co-chief executive Mike Sicilia's earlier remarks that "the use of AI coding tools inside Oracle is enabling smaller engineering teams to deliver more complete solutions to our customers more quickly." He added that such systems have already been deployed to generate new sales leads, automate customer interactions, and even design parts of the company's new website.

A major portion of Oracle's current spending is tied to Stargate, a multibillion-dollar data center initiative led in partnership with OpenAI, SoftBank, and the MGX investment fund. The effort aims to establish vast computing capacity across the US, with the first site already partially operational in Abilene, Texas.

Analysts view the collaboration as both a strategic breakthrough and a financial gamble; Oracle is taking on tens of billions in debt to help fund the project, while OpenAI itself remains unprofitable.

Oracle's cuts align with an industry-wide recalibration. Amazon has laid off roughly 30,000 employees over the past six months, while payments firm Block and game developer Epic Games have made similar reductions.

Executives including Meta's Mark Zuckerberg and Block's Jack Dorsey have argued that automation and AI tools allow smaller teams to deliver more output, a rationale echoed across Silicon Valley boardrooms.

For Oracle, the workforce reductions reflect both economic prudence and technological transformation. As the company deepens its reliance on automation to meet AI-driven demand, the immediate question for investors and employees alike will be whether its machine-led model can scale as aggressively as the technology itself.

Permalink to story:

 
Only the companies selling the shovels are truly winning in this AI boom.

Oracle is the most exposed of the next tier of AI companies (who may or may not win) as the only one without a direct usage.
 
I see long lines at Harbor Freight as they buy welders. Of course, they could farm or drive trucks. I don't like to see folk lose their jobs because of layoffs. It has happened to me more than once. What I did was find work. I didn't cry.
 
Surely this couldn't have anything to do with the fact that Oracle has been borrowing $10s of $Billions finance their AI buildout, despite zero signs of returns. And that their stock is heading towards a 52-week low.

No no, this clearly is pure AI efficiency gains. But why didn't they use AI to at least craft a better termination email?
 
Sometimes leaders have to make hard decisions. But not being to put your name on a decision or to communicate about it directly is weak sauce. ("from: Oracle Leadership").

As I think more about this, I wonder if there's a semi-explanation like maybe the board required it over the objections of the CEO and the CEO refused to sign the announcement. Still gutless and classless either way.
 
Surely this couldn't have anything to do with the fact that Oracle has been borrowing $10s of $Billions finance their AI buildout, despite zero signs of returns. And that their stock is heading towards a 52-week low.

No no, this clearly is pure AI efficiency gains. But why didn't they use AI to at least craft a better termination email?

I've heard a new phrase for this: "AI Washing"
 
And their Java no longer seems to be supported. Downloading Java at java.com results in a 502 server error. What will become
of android? It's all written in Java.
 
Only the companies selling the shovels are truly winning in this AI boom.
And the companies buying those shovels. In my own field of materials science research, AI has already resulted in a rate of advance not possible beforehand. In medical diagnostics, AI is saving lives by catching anomalies human doctors miss. And a personal friend of mine who owns a logistics firm tells me he's saving one million gallons of diesel a year, by replacing his routing team with an AI agent.
 
Except that the companies selling shovels are now also the people lending money to the companies buying those shovels, creating a circular economy. It will be interesting to see it all implode.
That doesn't matter unless the shovel clients go bankrupt. And at their margins half of them could not pay and they would still make a profit.

Implosion may harm -or even end- some AI companies, but the AI hardware vendors will only make less money than before when that happens.
 
Nicely contributing to unemployment .
Hopefully the company gets burned on this decision.
 
Hey but according to the A.I apologists online they say:

"A.I is not taking away jobs, this is just a generational transition"

I'm sure those affected are not seeing it as a "generational transition"
 
Nothing says “AI will create new jobs” like a 30,000 person layoff tied directly to AI productivity gains.

Oracle taking on tens of billions in debt to build AI infrastructure while cutting staff feels like the most Silicon Valley thing ever: fire humans to fund machines that replace humans, hope demand shows up later.
 
Nothing says “AI will create new jobs” like a 30,000 person layoff tied directly to AI productivity gains.
I hate to interrupt you with facts, but the average US unemployment rate since 1948 has been 5.8%. It currently stands at 4.4%, well below historical norms. And in 2015, when unemployment edged down to 5%, the media announced we'd reached "the natural rate" of unemployment, and hailed our success at eliminating the problem.

 
To all those people who said AI replacing people in the workplace would never be a problem, I ask you: You were saying what now?
 
That's the problem with a lot of these so called "investment" companies. They are like a lot of drug users just looking for the next "high" and the h*ll with everyone else. CAN this AI stuff do anything? Oh, perhaps, but not at the investment rate these companies are DUMPING money into it.
People like Ellison, surround themselves with "yes" men. They smile, bow to him and when he comes up with a bad idea, you think they will go against him?
Nope! They want to stay on the gravy train.
When this AI data center nonsense crashes, on the plus side, there will be a TON of chips that get pushed onto the market DIRT CHEAP.
 
And their Java no longer seems to be supported. Downloading Java at java.com results in a 502 server error. What will become
of android? It's all written in Java.

You sure about that? I've just downloaded JRE 8u_481 for Linux. Came down the pipes with no issues...

Miq.
 
I see long lines at Harbor Freight as they buy welders. Of course, they could farm or drive trucks. I don't like to see folk lose their jobs because of layoffs. It has happened to me more than once. What I did was find work. I didn't cry.
Wages are probably going to start spiraling towards the bottom if AI can replace skilled workers. They already have self driving trucks and humanoid robots that can perform basic tasks like waitering/waitressing. Robots that can fix plumbing will probably come in the next few decades.
 
Back