whateversa
Posts: 142 +188
I suspect much of this is not presented accurately.
1) Crimea did not have Starlink coverage and the original reason given was to prevent russians from using starlink.
2) Even if SpaceX was to suddenly turn coverage on (if it could be done in time of the request), it means his civilian infrastructure is now used explicitly as military infrastructure and becomes a target for Russia to attack. All that while he is providing a free service (they were not paid at the time).
1) Crimea did not have Starlink coverage and the original reason given was to prevent russians from using starlink.
2) Even if SpaceX was to suddenly turn coverage on (if it could be done in time of the request), it means his civilian infrastructure is now used explicitly as military infrastructure and becomes a target for Russia to attack. All that while he is providing a free service (they were not paid at the time).