Rooftop solar panels could help mitigate climate change with widespread adoption

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 663   +15
Staff
The big picture: Recent solar energy research highlights the potential for a future where solar panels play a pivotal role in reducing dependence on carbon-emitting energy sources. As scientists develop more efficient solar cells, this vision becomes increasingly within reach and could positively affect global temperatures.

Proponents have long touted solar power as a cleaner alternative to traditional fossil fuels. New research finds it could play a significant role in mitigating global climate change. The study published in Nature delves into the potential of widespread solar adoption to reduce Earth's rising temperature, focusing on the impact of installing solar panels on most compatible rooftops worldwide. The findings indicate that such an initiative could lower the planet's average surface temperature by 0.13 degrees Celsius.

To assess the feasibility of this approach, researchers from China, Germany, Italy, and Sweden employed geospatial data mining and artificial intelligence to estimate the global rooftop area. Their calculations revealed 286,393 square kilometers, or 110,576 square miles, of available rooftop space.

However, they also considered the challenges associated with solar adoption, including disparities in economic resources and technical expertise across different regions. For instance, wealthy nations tend to have an easier time implementing solar technology due to better infrastructure and more trained personnel.

The team further analyzed how different geographic zones could influence solar output. For example, rooftop solar panels in regions like the Southwestern United States could produce more energy than in areas with less sunlight, such as Tromsø, Norway.

Using geographic rooftop area clusters to determine regional solar feasibility, the researchers estimated how much of each region's carbon-producing energy sources could be replaced by solar power. They project that widespread solar adoption could reduce carbon emissions sufficiently to lower global temperatures by 0.05 to 0.13 degrees Celsius by 2050.

While the study highlights the potential of solar power, it should be tempered with a grain of salt. It merely demonstrates solar's capabilities rather than a practical roadmap for immediate implementation. Placing solar panels on every compatible roof worldwide would be highly challenging.

Nonetheless, the research underscores the importance of transitioning from fossil fuels to clean energy sources in combating climate change. As scientists continue to develop more efficient solar cells and explore innovative ways to harness solar power beyond rooftop installations, the potential for solar energy to mitigate global warming is even more significant.

Permalink to story:

 
I wonder who is funding this "research" calculating global rooftop area and idiocies like that. USAID? They were right to shut it down. There are zillions of these ridiculous "studies". Imagine if all the wasted money were used to finance something useful and solve real problems.
 
Do you know why I like Solar? it actually has nothing to do with the environment. My electric company are *******s and I was surprised by how little solar I actually needed. My whole house doesn't run on solar, but I have 4, 350 watt panels sitting on the garage that I have connected to the UPS on my server rack and I have my UPS in basically a "supplementary" power mode. I can power my entire home lab off solar if I don't have everything running full bore. The few games servers I have running barely go above 10% and my NAS hits 100% load for maybe 5 minutes a day, aside from that it's basically running at around 100 watts just keeping the drives spinning. With basically 1000 watts of solar(they never generate the 350 ea they're rated for) I have pretty much eliminated all of the power consumption of my homelab. Maybe the battery will need replaced, but that will have well paid for itself for the cost of electric saved.

I've been considering going all solar for awhile now and that's just because I HATE my electric company. Once they claimed I was stealing electricity, I wasn't. I also wanted to get wired for 3 phase since the poles outside have 3 phase and I have some 3 phase "toys" in my garage. Well, I can't get 3 phase since I'm not zoned for commercial(no ordinances say that, it's one of their internal rules) and they can't fine me for power factor when I use my rotary 3 phase converter.
 
I wonder who is funding this "research" calculating global rooftop area and idiocies like that. USAID? They were right to shut it down. There are zillions of these ridiculous "studies". Imagine if all the wasted money were used to finance something useful and solve real problems.
What would you say to one of the kids in Africa who just had their USAID HIV or polio treatment cut off mid-therapy? You'll be fine though because Fox News won't cover the story, but the rest of us will watch in horror, watching real news, as more than 200,000+ humans, mostly children, die that could have easily lived had they finished their treatment.
 
Do you know why I like Solar? it actually has nothing to do with the environment. My electric company are *******s and I was surprised by how little solar I actually needed. My whole house doesn't run on solar, but I have 4, 350 watt panels sitting on the garage that I have connected to the UPS on my server rack and I have my UPS in basically a "supplementary" power mode. I can power my entire home lab off solar if I don't have everything running full bore. The few games servers I have running barely go above 10% and my NAS hits 100% load for maybe 5 minutes a day, aside from that it's basically running at around 100 watts just keeping the drives spinning. With basically 1000 watts of solar(they never generate the 350 ea they're rated for) I have pretty much eliminated all of the power consumption of my homelab. Maybe the battery will need replaced, but that will have well paid for itself for the cost of electric saved.

I've been considering going all solar for awhile now and that's just because I HATE my electric company. Once they claimed I was stealing electricity, I wasn't. I also wanted to get wired for 3 phase since the poles outside have 3 phase and I have some 3 phase "toys" in my garage. Well, I can't get 3 phase since I'm not zoned for commercial(no ordinances say that, it's one of their internal rules) and they can't fine me for power factor when I use my rotary 3 phase converter.


Thing is with most stuff like this EV etc - only small percentage will take a financial hit for lower foot print .

I will go solar in a year or 2- pays to do research - will use a couple of different surfaces as smaller house and steady flow all day long.

I think like owning your own home , has it's own pros and cons, eg pets , decorate as you like, stability vs tied down etc
 
Where I live (on a tropical island) we have a glut of rooftop-produced solar power whenever the sun is shining. Our grid doesn't connect to anywhere else, so there's nowhere for it to go. Meanwhile we still need the full complement of generation capacity for whenever its dark or cloudy.

So really it's all about the batteries. I am starting to see more electric cars around. If only there was some standard so that every car was also a standby battery for rooftop house electric.
 
I wonder who is funding this "research" calculating global rooftop area and idiocies like that. USAID? They were right to shut it down. There are zillions of these ridiculous "studies". Imagine if all the wasted money were used to finance something useful and solve real problems.

what's a real problem , how to strip mine national parks, how to take money from regular peoples pockets and put it in Billionaires pockets for bragging and more corruption,
To stop people eating cats and dogs, egg prices, hunters laptop, Hillary's emails ?- That Medicaid/care is 880 Billion over budget. That Trump doesn't know NATO history or understand soft foreign leveraging , and that you can have win win vs endless whining - King Charles had Zelinsky visit that's not fair it cheapened my visit

Tell me why you think the YOY temperature increases is not a real problem
Why longer droughts, more intense longer heat waves, more flooding is not a problem

What's that - you have AC and you watch fox and read funded big polluter websites saying CO2 is wonderful - so don't care in 100 degrees or 40 in the free world for 5 days straight including the nights

Really as someone else mentioned get out of the bubble , watch world news - be you would be hard press to name even one flooding event last year - when their were dozens of once in a 100 year ones

If you are going to quote mis-information , at least try and check it , as we now discount anything you say as silly nonsense
Tell me a real problem ?
Tell me when the world will stop warming ?? ( never get an answer your you guys on this ever - because you know you are not honest or kind or caring , just rationalising selfish greedy behaviour )

Tell me why everything is black or white , either or ( binary solar power bad, guantanamo bay with no legal process good, aid for poverty/infectious diseases bad , sweet contracts for Elon good )

Maybe you are just easily manipulated with lies and fear - tariffs great , EU/Canada/Mexico bad , Russia/Oban great

Start thinking for yourself - follow the money - USA won't be making it - everything tanking to recession
 
Where I live (on a tropical island) we have a glut of rooftop-produced solar power whenever the sun is shining. Our grid doesn't connect to anywhere else, so there's nowhere for it to go. Meanwhile we still need the full complement of generation capacity for whenever its dark or cloudy.

So really it's all about the batteries. I am starting to see more electric cars around. If only there was some standard so that every car was also a standby battery for rooftop house electric.
I always thought that was a good idea.

 
Manufacturing, not households, are responsible for majority of emmisions. Including emmisions from burning coal in China to manufacture those more and more affordable panels.
 
I've got solar panels and a battery, which is nice, but expensive - even after the 30% subsidy from the federal government. About half of the cost is in the installation; unlike cars you can't standardize an install so the price per kWh of battery capacity is ~10x or more than what you would expect. The highest capacity widely available home batteries today have around ~15kWh each, compared to nearly ~100kWh found in cars, which means you likely need two of them to last a full night during cold winters or hot summers (I only bought one, two was just too rich for my blood). A bit of wind power on the roof (I've seen small 1kW wind turbines that look reasonable and fairly cost effective) might just be what we need to last through the night if cheaper batteries aren't likely anytime soon.

Anyways, I wonder how much the install cost could be cut if they were included as part of the designs when new homes are built. Of course, there's an affordability crisis with homes anyways, but perhaps if there were stronger subsidies that would help mitigate that. Environmental concerns aside, we could use the additional energy anyways, to power electric cars, datacenters, etc. Getting lots of homes to be more-or-less energy independent (net exporters after a whole year, since seasonal fluctuations have a big impact) would free up a lot of capacity for those other things.
 
If every household installs solar panel on their roofs, it’s going to create more global warming, not reduce it. The panels are black, and they absorb heat and heat up greatly partially due to the process of converting light into power. Don’t take my word for it, just place a black or dark tinted glass out in noon day sun, then go crack an egg on it after 30 mins. I got a rude shock when I accidentally touched my Anker 15W solar panel left in the sun for some time. On one hand, we are saying to reflect heat back to space, on the other hand, some textbook “genius” is saying the opposite. You can get power from sunlight which is great, but it does not come without its price.
 
Yeah...lets put solar panels on top of the house....Ummm NO! A lot of the "midwest/plains" area has these events called HAIL STORMS. They tear up roofs, windows, cars etc. I'm sure the solar panels wouldn't survive it either.
 
If every household installs solar panel on their roofs, it’s going to create more global warming, not reduce it. The panels are black, and they absorb heat and heat up greatly partially due to the process of converting light into power. Don’t take my word for it, just place a black or dark tinted glass out in noon day sun, then go crack an egg on it after 30 mins. I got a rude shock when I accidentally touched my Anker 15W solar panel left in the sun for some time. On one hand, we are saying to reflect heat back to space, on the other hand, some textbook “genius” is saying the opposite. You can get power from sunlight which is great, but it does not come without its price.
Solar panels are reflective, their albedo is better than a dark-colored tar shingle roof. I have solar on my roof. I checked. Roof from inside the attic under where the solar panels is also cooler.
 
Yeah...lets put solar panels on top of the house....Ummm NO! A lot of the "midwest/plains" area has these events called HAIL STORMS. They tear up roofs, windows, cars etc. I'm sure the solar panels wouldn't survive it either.
I have solar and no hail has ever broken a panel of mine. I have however had to replace the exposed parts of the roof twice after a hailstorm. Houston, TX.

Seems a lot of you have some incorrect opinions about solar?
 
I'm always weary of putting them on the roof. The weight, mounting screws and leaks if shoddy installation is done. If I had the money and property space, I'd probably have a platform built on the ground. Another thing is Solar Companies going bankrupt in a short time because of finance problems, changing policies and a host of more things.
 
No way! Climate change fraud and hoax. Not dime of taxpayers money for solar panels or anything Green. You want it. You pay for it out of your own pocket.
 
Yeah...lets put solar panels on top of the house....Ummm NO! A lot of the "midwest/plains" area has these events called HAIL STORMS. They tear up roofs, windows, cars etc. I'm sure the solar panels wouldn't survive it either.
Agreed! And the climate change hoaxers will be cut off from Federal taxpayers subsidies.
 
Except for those that were left hanging because a lot of solar companies went bankrupt and did not finish the work, lol.
 
I'm always weary of putting them on the roof. The weight, mounting screws and leaks if shoddy installation is done. If I had the money and property space, I'd probably have a platform built on the ground. Another thing is Solar Companies going bankrupt in a short time because of finance problems, changing policies and a host of more things.
The weight is no more than a 2nd layer of shingles. As for the holes that's on the installation.. you can have a good installer with warranty including. Yes pick a good installer that does it right and has been doing it awhile
 
What would you say to one of the kids in Africa who just had their USAID HIV or polio treatment cut off mid-therapy? You'll be fine though because Fox News won't cover the story, but the rest of us will watch in horror, watching real news, as more than 200,000+ humans, mostly children, die that could have easily lived had they finished their treatment.
Dying children is mostly a leftist media concoction, not all USAID money was stopped. If money doing real good was cut, that's because ginormous amounts were wasted on 'climate change', including "research" as the one described above.
If all the money and resourced wasted on "climate change" were used to solve real problems, like health problems in Africa or wherever, most of these problems would have been long gone.
 
Back