Samsung phone division could post its first ever loss as AI drives memory costs higher

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,002   +58
Staff
Bottom line: Samsung's mobile division faces an unprecedented financial threat not from competition or weak sales, but from the AI industry's insatiable appetite for memory components. TM Roh, head of Samsung MX, has alerted company leadership that the division could post its first net loss in the division's history. The culprit is LPDDR5X memory and NAND storage, components now commanding premium prices.

The financial pressures stem from a fundamental shift in smartphone bill of materials. DRAM and NAND used to be minor costs but now dominate device expenses.

Counterpoint Research projects that RAM will represent over one-third of total manufacturing costs for budget phones by mid-2026, while even flagship devices see memory accounting for more than 20% of their build expense. This marks a dramatic reversal from the recent past, when application processors and displays commanded the largest cost shares.

The memory shortage affects computing hardware across categories, from consumer laptops to enterprise servers. LPDDR5X has become particularly critical for AI applications. Nvidia's Vera AI CPU will pack up to 1.5 TB of LPDDR5X memory. The company's forthcoming rack-scale AI platforms will deploy 36 Vera CPUs alongside 72 Rubin GPUs, a single server configuration that would consume as much RAM as roughly 4,600 Galaxy S26 Ultra smartphones, each containing 12GB of RAM.

Samsung has begun phasing out LPDDR4 production to allocate more capacity to LPDDR5, while competitors Micron and SK Hynix are similarly ramping output. Despite these efforts, Nikkei Asia forecasts that DRAM supply in 2027 could meet only about 60% of projected demand, even under optimistic production scenarios.

Source: Counterpoint Research

Handset manufacturers are now passing memory cost increases to consumers. Motorola raised prices on its Moto G budget line by up to 50%, while Samsung added $50 to the Galaxy A37 and A57 mid-range models compared to their predecessors.

Premium devices also cost more: the 512GB Galaxy Z Flip 7 and both the 512GB and 1TB Galaxy Z Fold 7 variants carry an additional $80, and the Galaxy Tab S11 increased by $100.

These price adjustments come as Samsung's Galaxy S26 maintains strong sales performance, yet the mobile division still faces potential losses due to memory and storage component costs that have roughly doubled.

Samsung's smartphone business faces margin pressure, but its semiconductor division is posting record profits. Samsung's semiconductor division reportedly generated an estimated $38 billion profit in Q1 2026, more than seven times its Q1 2025 earnings.

The divergence highlights how AI infrastructure investment has created winners and losers within Samsung's business portfolio, with memory production benefiting from the same market dynamics squeezing the mobile division.

Permalink to story:

 
The 40 billion windfall they are getting from the price-fixed-cartel DRAM etc they are selling from their semiconductor arm should help to soften the blow...
 
Last edited:
Perhaps Samsung and others need to learn causing an artificial shortage and hiking prices to the point that people stop buying will actually cause these companies to lose money in the longer term, but no that's wishful thinking. Once the AI bubble pops they'll go back to making consumer market RAM & NAND, though I doubt we'll ever see the pre-AI hype pricing again.
 
Good lol. All of their devices are cheap pieces of garbage made by slave labor for $5 and resold for thousands. I've had their stuff, currently do, won't again. They suck.

990 Pro 2TB in my rig now has a sector size of 512 bytes..........and a cheap pcie 3.0 crucial 1 tb that cost me $80 has a 4 kilobyte sector size. Samsung is not even up to modern standards with their "flagship" devices.

PIECE OF TRASH COMPANY, I hope you fall and have to give all of your profits back to the customers. Nice $1100 Ultra with 480hz pwm dimming btw and no bluetooth support on the pen either. Cheap *** company. Die naturally, but faster.
 
I just hope companies realize that releasing phones every year is a very bad business strategy. One every 3-5 years is more than enough, and that way each iteration can actually be innovative and "bar setting' and not just miniscule upgrades over the previous years.
 
Perhaps Samsung and others need to learn causing an artificial shortage and hiking prices to the point that people stop buying will actually cause these companies to lose money in the longer term, but no that's wishful thinking. Once the AI bubble pops they'll go back to making consumer market RAM & NAND, though I doubt we'll ever see the pre-AI hype pricing again.
Wow, you’re really mad about this huh? I’m guessing it’s because you plan to pay the premium for memory. If so, you’re part of the very problem you’re complaining about.
Good lol. All of their devices are cheap pieces of garbage made by slave labor for $5 and resold for thousands. I've had their stuff, currently do, won't again. They suck.

990 Pro 2TB in my rig now has a sector size of 512 bytes..........and a cheap pcie 3.0 crucial 1 tb that cost me $80 has a 4 kilobyte sector size. Samsung is not even up to modern standards with their "flagship" devices.

PIECE OF TRASH COMPANY, I hope you fall and have to give all of your profits back to the customers. Nice $1100 Ultra with 480hz pwm dimming btw and no bluetooth support on the pen either. Cheap *** company. Die naturally, but faster.
Someone’s triggered on two accounts lol.
 
Is Samsung crying now because of a problem they artificially created? Samsung could follow in Micron's footsteps, drop their consumer division and just concentrate on the enterprise sector.
 
Wow, you’re really mad about this huh? I’m guessing it’s because you plan to pay the premium for memory. If so, you’re part of the very problem you’re complaining about.
The anger I and a lot of people have are very well justified, but no your guess is wrong. I have enough memory and storage, it's not worth the paying the massively hiked prices Samsung and the other memory manufacturers are asking. I only regret not getting any extra RAM or SSD before these companies decided to create a shortage and raise prices 3-4X over what the cost was before the AI bubble started.
 
The anger I and a lot of people have are very well justified, but no your guess is wrong. I have enough memory and storage, it's not worth the paying the massively hiked prices Samsung and the other memory manufacturers are asking. I only regret not getting any extra RAM or SSD before these companies decided to create a shortage and raise prices 3-4X over what the cost was before the AI bubble started.
So you’re angry because you can’t afford more RAM lol?
 
The anger I and a lot of people have are very well justified
Very ... how dare these companies use AI to better diagnose cancer, research stronger, more durable materials, develop new breakthrough pharmaceuticals, engineer more reliable, fuel-efficient engines, and optimize shipping logistics to save time and fuel while reducing waste ... don't they know you need more RAM for the upcoming sequel to Duke Nukem?
 
Back