Samsung's foldable clamshell phone may hinge on the success of the Galaxy Fold

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,291   +192
Staff member
In brief: The South Korean tech giant is reportedly working with designer Thom Browne on the effort with the goal of appealing to a broader range of consumers, not just tech-minded buyers. It’ll feature cutting-edge tech, mind you, but also appeal to nostalgic buyers interested in rejuvenating the flip phone.

Samsung’s vision with its first… and next… foldable smartphone was to create a device that opens up like a book, transforming the handset into what’s more or less a small tablet. The concept has some intrigue although manufacturing issues have kept it and similar phones like the Mate X at bay thus far.

As futuristic as it might seem, foldable phones aren’t a new concept. Indeed, most phones from the mid-2000s featured a clamshell design with a flip-out screen. When closed, the handsets were roughly half their normal size which made them easily pocketable. It was a tangible benefit and one that could make a return thanks to foldable displays.

Sources familiar with the matter told Bloomberg that Samsung is working on a phone with a 6.7-inch inner display that folds inwards like a traditional clamshell. A hole-punch selfie camera will be positioned at the top of the inner display with two more cameras on the outside that’ll face forward when the device is closed. It’ll be thinner than the Galaxy Fold and more affordable, too, we’re told.

News of a second-gen Galaxy Fold matching this description first surfaced in June although with the original Fold’s continued delay, the mid-2020 launch window could be in jeopardy. Indeed, one source said the launch will hinge (no pun intended) on how well the Fold sells once it launches.

Motorola is also said to be working on a modern version of its iconic Razr phone with a foldable display. Early fan-made concepts of the new Razr look incredibly promising and have even garnered the attention of parent company Lenovo.

Motorola Razr image by Lenscap Photography

Permalink to story.

 
More style over substance. They want these things to LOOK expensive, so they can "justify" the God awful prices! For that amount of money, you can carry a smartphone & a tablet and be as productive. But, it will be the hipsters that swim or sink these things. They typically glam onto the trendy garbage of today. If they ignore it, it will sink.
 
More style over substance. They want these things to LOOK expensive, so they can "justify" the God awful prices! For that amount of money, you can carry a smartphone & a tablet and be as productive. But, it will be the hipsters that swim or sink these things. They typically glam onto the trendy garbage of today. If they ignore it, it will sink.
Why do you want this product to be a failure?
 
Problem is that Samsung seems to have given up being on the cutting edge; possibly from those few large failures in years past. Their idea of a fold-able seems to ignore the very reason for having a fold-able phone, which would be a much larger screen, but I guess there is a certain amount of fashion to consider. Still, with a phone that is going to command over $1,000 a copy I would think they would want to give the buyer as much as possible. Only time will tell for sure!
 
Why do you want this product to be a failure?
I don't "want" it to be a failure, except for the price point. I've been in electronics for almost 50 years. From vacuum tubes, to transistors, the 8088 processors and on up. You can't tell me that this "folding" crap "justifies" the price. Pretty much ANY smartphone as a build cost, minus marketing, of around 300-400 dollars. 2000 dollars for THIS? Nope, WAY overpriced. But, if it works better than their first try at this, there will the crazies that buy it, which will allow Samsung & others to continue to over inflate the price consumers pay for this crap.
 
I don't "want" it to be a failure, except for the price point. I've been in electronics for almost 50 years. From vacuum tubes, to transistors, the 8088 processors and on up. You can't tell me that this "folding" crap "justifies" the price. Pretty much ANY smartphone as a build cost, minus marketing, of around 300-400 dollars. 2000 dollars for THIS? Nope, WAY overpriced. But, if it works better than their first try at this, there will the crazies that buy it, which will allow Samsung & others to continue to over inflate the price consumers pay for this crap.
Of course it's expensive,It's a niche device and it's been in development for awhile, I'm not surprised in the slightest. They're probably just testing demand for such devices once they hit the market. If it's an hit they can scale up production and bring costs down. If not they'll probably stop making it.

I know this is the internet but this unjustified hate for things that are completely irrelevant to people's lives is as annoying as it is frustrating. People WANT this to fail which means people WANT those who paid $2000 for this phone to be stuck with a bad product.

While I don't want one, I want this device to be a success for those who buy it and give people an experience worth $2000.
 
Back