South Korea is betting $880 billion that the next AI race will be won in hardware, not software

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,011   +58
Staff
Bottom line: South Korea is moving aggressively to build the infrastructure behind artificial intelligence, committing vast sums to chips and data centers as it tries to maintain its position in a rapidly evolving tech economy. The government is coordinating roughly 1,350 trillion won (about $880 billion) in planned investments from major companies including Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix. The focus is not just on expanding capacity but on strengthening the broader AI ecosystem, from high-end memory chips to the data centers that power them.

A significant portion of that spending is earmarked for semiconductor manufacturing. Samsung Group and SK Group plan to build two new chip fabrication plants each in the country's southwest, with a combined value of about 800 trillion won. The goal is to rapidly expand capacity as demand accelerates for memory chips that power AI systems, particularly high-bandwidth memory used in intensive computing applications.

At the same time, South Korea is scaling up its data infrastructure. Companies, including Naver, are expected to invest about 550 trillion won to develop 8.4 gigawatts of AI data center capacity by 2029. That level of expansion would enable the country to handle large-scale AI workloads domestically rather than relying on overseas providers.

President Lee Jae Myung has framed the effort in stark terms, tying it directly to the country's economic future. "We're entering an era where the page turns in the blink of an eye," he said during a briefing, where he also referred to Samsung and SK Hynix leaders as "national heroes." He added, "Speed is the only way to survive."

The scale of the investment reflects how central memory technology has become to AI development. South Korea is a leading player in the global memory chip market, but maintaining that position requires continuous reinvestment as technology advances. The total planned spending amounts to roughly 5% of the country's 2024 GDP, based on World Bank data.

Samsung alone has said it will spend more than $70 billion in 2026 to expand production and advance research. Over time, that could put the company in the same spending league as US hyperscalers such as Microsoft and China's planned AI investment initiative, which is reportedly valued at about $295 billion.

Industry leaders say the timeline is tight. "It's a race against time," Samsung Electronics Executive Chairman Jay Y. Lee said at the briefing. The company is accelerating construction of fabs in the Seoul metropolitan area while also developing new regional hubs.

Gwangju is being developed as a center for memory manufacturing, while Cheonan and Onyang will focus on high-bandwidth memory packaging, a critical step in improving chip performance for AI applications.

Samsung is also planning to introduce humanoid robots into its fabrication facilities in Gumi as part of a broader push to automate chip production.

The geographic distribution of these investments is deliberate. The government is trying to shift more high-value industry beyond Seoul, using AI infrastructure to stimulate regional economies and create higher-paying jobs.

President Lee used a post on X to highlight what he sees as the need for a broad, collective effort to address regional imbalances. He described it as a shared national mission, calling on the public to cooperate and contribute ideas to reduce the concentration of economic activity in the capital region and promote more balanced growth nationwide.

At its core, the strategy is a bet that the next phase of AI will be defined as much by access to hardware as by software. By investing simultaneously in chip manufacturing, packaging, and data centers, South Korea is seeking to establish a foothold across the entire AI infrastructure stack that underpins modern AI systems.

Permalink to story:

 
Its hard to fathom how all these companies are spending so many $100s of billions and think its a good investment, particularly when every bit of compute silicon is scrapped every 2-3 years after the next step up hits and depreciates your data center to oblivion.

As a whole, these companies can 100% put out some useful AI products, but how do they think they'll recoup their capital investment? I guess they're just smarter than me and know something I dont..
 
Funny, a little over a year ago they said they wouldn't invest in manufacturing capacity because they didn't believe in the long term sustainability of AI.
Funny, a little over a year ago you were predicting the imminent collapse of the "AI bubble". You predicted the same six months, and again as recently as last week. Not an inspiring track record.

But you're wrong about Samsung. They aggressively increased manufacturing capacity both in 2024 and again in 2025 ... just not by the historically unprecedented 800%+ demand surge that occurred late last year.
 
Funny, a little over a year ago you were predicting the imminent collapse of the "AI bubble". You predicted the same six months, and again as recently as last week. Not an inspiring track record.

But you're wrong about Samsung. They aggressively increased manufacturing capacity both in 2024 and again in 2025 ... just not by the historically unprecedented 800%+ demand surge that occurred late last year.
I have long suspected that you, yourself, are just an AI bot trolling the internet spreading falsehoods for someone else. I disagree with many people, but your fundamental misunderstanding on so many subjects and just outright falsehoods cannot be explained by shear stupidity. If someone was actually that dumb they wouldn't be able to write and there are some estimates that about half of the content written on the internet is now written by AI bots. I was reading a "health" article this morning about how many people in the modern world suffer from selenium deficiency and we need to be eating lots more of it.
 
I have long suspected that you, yourself, are just an AI bot trolling the internet spreading falsehoods for someone else. I disagree with many people, but your fundamental misunderstanding on so many subjects and just outright falsehoods cannot be explained by shear stupidity. If someone was actually that dumb they wouldn't be able to write and there are some estimates that about half of the content written on the internet is now written by AI bots. I was reading a "health" article this morning about how many people in the modern world suffer from selenium deficiency and we need to be eating lots more of it.

I am 100% sure it's a bot that spends 24/7/365 posting total garbage.

And not even a smart one! Must be a very early model.
 
....your fundamental misunderstanding on so many subjects and just outright falsehoods cannot be explained by shear [sic] stupidity.
A much younger, more idealistic version of myself believed that if you presented individuals with obvious, incontrovertible facts, they'd eventually accept them. People like yourself have proven me wrong. AI is not a passing fad, datacenters are still being built, arbitration clauses don't require you to use a company's paid representative, and the earth is indeed round. Believe or not as you choose.
 
Last edited:
A much younger, more idealistic version of myself believed that if you presented individuals with obvious, incontrovertible facts, they'd eventually accept them. People like yourself have proven me wrong. AI is not a passing fad, datacenters are still being built, arbitration clauses don't require you to use a company's paid representative, and the earth is indeed round. Believe or not as you choose.
Curious, where did I say the earth was not round? I can see you are at it again, making up your own facts as you go.
 
Curious, where did I say the earth was not round? I can see you are at it again, making up your own facts as you go.
Are you that unfamiliar with the English language and conversation in general that you took an exaggerated rule of three joke seriously?

Bruh..... For someone claiming other people are bots, this is incredible bot behavior.
I am 100% sure it's a bot that spends 24/7/365 posting total garbage.

And not even a smart one! Must be a very early model.
Here's a question: If Endymio is a bot, then why is it that nobody can contradict his points?

Samsung invested $35 billion into their semiconductor business in 2024, primarily aimed at HBM production.

https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10409402

This investment would increase to $73 billion in 2025

https://tech-insider.org/samsung-73-billion-semiconductor-investment-2026/

So why are we claiming he is a bot when it took 2 seconds of Googling to confirm what he was saying? Or you could have countered his argument by pointing out the lions share of that 2024 investment went into expanding HBM production at the expense of DDR4 production, so not expanding capacity but rather re-tooling, not fixing the issue in the slightest.

If he is a stupid bot...then what does that make you guys? His points are not without fault, but you guys cant seem to actually argue any of them.
 
They won't have enough electricity.

"The National Assembly enacted a broad electricity sector restructuring program in 2000, but the restructuring process was halted amid political controversy in 2004 and remains a topic of intense political debate." Energy in South Korea; Wikipedia
 
Are you that unfamiliar with the English language and conversation in general that you took an exaggerated rule of three joke seriously?

Bruh..... For someone claiming other people are bots, this is incredible bot behavior.
Here's a question: If Endymio is a bot, then why is it that nobody can contradict his points?

Samsung invested $35 billion into their semiconductor business in 2024, primarily aimed at HBM production.

https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10409402

This investment would increase to $73 billion in 2025

https://tech-insider.org/samsung-73-billion-semiconductor-investment-2026/

So why are we claiming he is a bot when it took 2 seconds of Googling to confirm what he was saying? Or you could have countered his argument by pointing out the lions share of that 2024 investment went into expanding HBM production at the expense of DDR4 production, so not expanding capacity but rather re-tooling, not fixing the issue in the slightest.

If he is a stupid bot...then what does that make you guys? His points are not without fault, but you guys cant seem to actually argue any of them.

LOL, that's hilarious, you and that bot both get your info from googling. You just confirmed that!! Does that mean he's not a bot??? LOL!!!!!!

Bot and AI get their info FROM THE INTERNET, gee, what a revelation to bots and "people" like you!!

And by the way, you have no idea how many people have that bot on their IGNORE list. You're asking for the same treatment.
 
Back