Stanford University's AI can tell if you're gay or straight from a photo

midian182

Posts: 9,741   +121
Staff member

As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly advanced, we're hearing more warnings about its potential dangers. Elon Musk thinks they’ll be the cause of World War 3, but based on a recent study from Stanford University, the systems could pose a more immediate threat when it comes to people’s privacy.

Michal Kosinski and Yilun Wang’s algorithm can accurately guess if a person is straight or gay based on a photo of their face. This was achieved using a sample of over 35,000 images that had been publicly posted on a US dating site, with an even representation of gay and straight (determined through their profiles) and male and female subjects.

The deep neural networks extracted features from the huge dataset, identifying certain trends to help it determine a person’s sexuality. Gay men tended to have “gender-atypical” features, expressions and grooming styles, meaning they appeared more feminine. They often had narrower jaws, longer noses and larger foreheads than straight men. The opposite was true for gay women, who generally had larger jaws and smaller foreheads.

The system was eventually able to distinguish between gay and straight men 81 percent of the time, and 74 percent of the time for women, just by reviewing a photo. When it was shown five images of the same person, accuracy levels went up to 91 percent for men and 83 percent for women. By contrast, a human was only able to identify sexual orientation 61 percent of the time for men and 54 percent for women.

The findings strongly support the theory that the same hormones affecting a fetus’ developing bone structure play a part in determining sexuality, meaning that people are born gay - it’s not a choice. Additionally, the lower success rate for women could suggest female sexual orientation is more fluid.

What’s concerning is the AI’s potential for misuse, especially for people who want to keep their sexual preferences private from friends and family. Google results show the phrase “is my husband gay?” is more common than “is my husband having an affair?”

There’s also the concern that the software could be used in countries such as Iran, Sudan, Saudi Arabia and Yemen, where homosexuality is punishable by death.

This isn’t the first time Kosinski has been linked to controversial research. His work with Cambridge University on psychometric profiling involved using Facebook profiles to create a model of someone’s personality. Donald Trump’s campaign and Brexit supporters in the UK reportedly used similar tools to target voters and help them achieve victory.

Permalink to story.

 
Ohhh man! I can't wait till this thing makes it to an app on the phone. This will be a lot of fun at work!

" The findings strongly support the theory that the same hormones affecting a fetus’ developing bone structure play a part in determining sexuality, meaning that people are born gay - it’s not a choice. "

Ok, the only problem I have with this saying is that someone who is a pedophile can make the same argument. This opens a huge door for pedophiles if society accepts this argument for a homosexuals, and to me that is a very scary thing. I know there are huge differences, homosexuals are both adults, and can both consent. A child is manipulated and raped no matter how a pedophile makes it seem in their minds, but the argument " born this way " is a scary one.
 
Ohhh man! I can't wait till this thing makes it to an app on the phone. This will be a lot of fun at work!

" The findings strongly support the theory that the same hormones affecting a fetus’ developing bone structure play a part in determining sexuality, meaning that people are born gay - it’s not a choice. "

Ok, the only problem I have with this saying is that someone who is a pedophile can make the same argument. This opens a huge door for pedophiles if society accepts this argument for a homosexuals, and to me that is a very scary thing. I know there are huge differences, homosexuals are both adults, and can both consent. A child is manipulated and raped no matter how a pedophile makes it seem in their minds, but the argument " born this way " is a scary one.
From my point of view, "born this way" has never been an argument, but rather a fact.
 
Not sure I would need this as much as an app that tells me whether you are a Republican or a Democrat. Then I could simply avoid talking to you
 
So those who say they are gay but the algorithm says otherwise are those who have chosen to be gay. Is fluid just another word for choice? That's what it seems like.
 
From my point of view, "born this way" has never been an argument, but rather a fact.

All im saying is homosexuals should be accepted because they aren't harming anyone, regardless of "born this way" or not. A pedophile is arguably "born this way" too, so how do you argue one should be accepted and the other not? Its because one harms another human being and the other doesn't. Dont use the argument "born this way", use "none of your f*ing buisness".
 
Why do you think you can easily identify someone with down syndrome? There ARE characteristics with certain traits in all humans, even down to the differences between races. This does NOT mean its 100% true though. There are going to be times when a straight person has the same characteristics of a gay person and also times a gay person will have the same characteristics of a straight person.
 
" The findings strongly support the theory that the same hormones affecting a fetus’ developing bone structure play a part in determining sexuality, meaning that people are born gay - it’s not a choice. "

Ok, the only problem I have with this saying is that someone who is a pedophile can make the same argument. This opens a huge door for pedophiles if society accepts this argument for a homosexuals, and to me that is a very scary thing. I know there are huge differences, homosexuals are both adults, and can both consent. A child is manipulated and raped no matter how a pedophile makes it seem in their minds, but the argument " born this way " is a scary one.

The problem with pedophilia is that it requires the exploitation of a non-consenting partner. Children are by definition unable to offer informed consent to sex. No such issue with consenting adults, gay or straight.
 
Ohhh man! I can't wait till this thing makes it to an app on the phone. This will be a lot of fun at work!

" The findings strongly support the theory that the same hormones affecting a fetus’ developing bone structure play a part in determining sexuality, meaning that people are born gay - it’s not a choice. "

Ok, the only problem I have with this saying is that someone who is a pedophile can make the same argument. This opens a huge door for pedophiles if society accepts this argument for a homosexuals, and to me that is a very scary thing. I know there are huge differences, homosexuals are both adults, and can both consent. A child is manipulated and raped no matter how a pedophile makes it seem in their minds, but the argument " born this way " is a scary one.

It's not a danger argument when put on the pedophilies debate. They would still be commiting a crime if they dont seek treatment for their urge. It just justifies the need for treating them, being them enprisioned after commintg an offense or free.
 
This does NOT mean its 100% true though. There are going to be times when a straight person has the same characteristics of a gay person and also times a gay person will have the same characteristics of a straight person.

Oh how im counting on this when it becomes an app!
 
Gay men tended to have “gender-atypical” features, expressions and grooming styles, meaning they appeared more feminine. They often had narrower jaws, longer noses and larger foreheads than straight men.

So these two must be total gays then, heh? -

beavis-and-butthead.jpg


Thanks for letting us know!
 
Last edited:
"female with larger jaws = gays". I don't want to be eaten alive by either a gay or straight shark.
 
Back