Study uncovers dark market making millions from video game cheats

Daniel Sims

Posts: 2,460   +74
Staff
The big picture: Researchers from the Universities of Birmingham and Warwick in the United Kingdom estimate that roughly 80 websites selling cheats for online video games generate between $12 million and $73 million annually. Although some cheats can bypass robust (and often unpopular) anti-cheating software, these tend to be more expensive.

Battlefield 6 open beta players on PC have encountered cheaters despite the game's controversial requirement that users enable Windows Secure Boot. While the situation might make strict anti-cheat solutions seem ineffective, recent research suggests they still help by increasing the cost of cheating.

The researchers analyzed public forums for Engine Owning, Sky Cheats, and numerous other cheat storefronts. They found that between 30,000 and 174,000 customers pay between $10 and $240 per month for software that gives them an unfair advantage in games such as Fortnite, Call of Duty, Rainbow Six Siege, Counter-Strike 2, Team Fortress 2, Escape From Tarkov, and other popular titles.

Engine Owning is the most popular, receiving around 500,000 visitors each month – likely because it offers some of the cheapest cheats, priced between $10 and $20. Notably, the difficulty of circumventing a game's anti-cheat protections has more influence on a cheat's price than the game's popularity.

This data may support the use of the strictest anti-cheat measures in upcoming titles such as Battlefield 6 and Call of Duty: Black Ops 7. Both games will require Windows Secure Boot, and Black Ops 7 will also require TPM 2.0. These methods check for anomalies upon system startup, effectively serving as kernel-level anti-cheat.

Some players oppose kernel-level anti-cheat because granting any program access to the deepest layer of a PC's operating system significantly increases the risk to users if the software is compromised or if developers make an error. The recent CrowdStrike disaster, which prompted Microsoft to reconsider allowing kernel-level security, is a notable example.

Although even kernel-level anti-cheat cannot completely eliminate cheating, Battlefield publisher EA still considers it worthwhile. Players began sharing footage of cheating almost immediately after the open beta launched, but EA reported catching around 330,000 cheaters, detecting tens of thousands daily.

The company says it never intended the Secure Boot requirement to be a cure-all, and recent research suggests it may still help curb cheating by making it more costly.

Permalink to story:

 
Not my scene. Is this done primarily for economic benefit? or just wanting to win? Because the former at least makes some sense to me - if your gig is farming rewards that you resell for cash, paying a little extra for tools to increase the loot you can sell seems like a business expense and you weren't playing for fun in the first place. Or maybe too if you're a streamer trying to look better for your fans.

As for the other case - I don't get it. Even if you fool everyone else you still know you're cheating. Why not skip the middle steps and just play a game that delivers the win rate experience you're looking for by design? That's why I mostly play single player games I eventually build strong characters and/or become good at - I can slay vast hordes of demons and it's all working as intended.
 
As for the other case - I don't get it. Even if you fool everyone else you still know you're cheating. Why not skip the middle steps and just play a game that delivers the win rate experience you're looking for by design?
Unfortunately these people just enjoy annoying others, sometimes it’s not about winning, just knowing you’re ruining the game for someone else is all they really thrive on.

The reason a lot of gamers still begrudgingly put up with kernel level anti-cheat is because of how much cheaters can ruin a good game.
 
Unfortunately these people just enjoy annoying others, sometimes it’s not about winning, just knowing you’re ruining the game for someone else is all they really thrive on.

The game presumably has nothing else to it. When it's automatically easy to kill everyone else they get bored and make a mess just to relieve the boredom. Simple game, simple outcome.
 
The game presumably has nothing else to it. When it's automatically easy to kill everyone else they get bored and make a mess just to relieve the boredom. Simple game, simple outcome.
The harder the game is, the more joy it is to still beat everyone with ease. It feels good to achieve things that are hard to achieve. Some people only know one way to do it--cheats.
 
Cheating is both good and bad, in a single player only game using it to do funner interesting things like the old GTA cheats I think are fine, You're not ruining the experience for anybody and if you've already beat the game a couple times having some fun is just having some fun.

However using them in multiplayer makes you the scum of the Earth.
 
Not my scene. Is this done primarily for economic benefit? or just wanting to win? Because the former at least makes some sense to me - if your gig is farming rewards that you resell for cash, paying a little extra for tools to increase the loot you can sell seems like a business expense and you weren't playing for fun in the first place. Or maybe too if you're a streamer trying to look better for your fans.

As for the other case - I don't get it. Even if you fool everyone else you still know you're cheating. Why not skip the middle steps and just play a game that delivers the win rate experience you're looking for by design? That's why I mostly play single player games I eventually build strong characters and/or become good at - I can slay vast hordes of demons and it's all working as intended.
I remember the only time I used trainer for online was Crysis 2 multiplayer while at college. Back then, half a year after release, everyone especially [ToughClan]tOuGhNuTs used some heavy stuff so it was practically impossible to play without some sort of norecoil.

Nowadays, I'm just gonna abandon the game if it overridden with cheaters. Gone older, started to value my time more.
 
Here's the thing, where there's an economic incentive anything, anything at all that is tried to prevent a security exploit will eventually fail. The problem with game cheats is developers use a heavy DRM handed attempt to control things, and all they really do is punish regular players more. It'd be much simpler to have "cheater" servers and allow players to vote on obvious cheaters that are then limited to those servers for 60 days if the community deems it. IMHO you'd see chronic cheaters preferring those servers eventually anyway.
 
It is interesting that cheat prices depend more on how hard it is to bypass protections than on how popular the game is. That means stronger anti-cheat does not stop the market, it just changes the economics.

 
Stop in-game purchases = no reselling = no cheating

alas, cannot stop someone from ruining the game coz they are bored or annoyed, but if players stop flocking to cheat sites, their demand would eventually wain out, though not entirely!
 
Back