The EU says Twitter/X is the worst platform for disinformation

Status
Not open for further replies.

midian182

Posts: 9,746   +121
Staff member
What just happened? The European Union has identified X, formerly Twitter, as the social media platform with the highest ratio of misinformation/disinformation posts. The news came just as X disabled a feature that allows users to report misinformation related to elections.

On Tuesday, the Vice President of the European Commission for Values and Transparency, Vera Jourová, gave a speech discussing the progress made under the EU's strengthened 2022 Code of Practice on Disinformation. She singled out X as being rife with mis/disinformation.

X was assessed in a pilot phase in three of the EU's member states to evaluate a new testing methodology for discovering how easy it is to find disinformation content, how much engagement such content receives, and indicators about sources.

"These indicators – developed by the signatories - constitute an unprecedented and novel insight into disinformation on online platforms. Such insight is crucial to understand how effective platforms efforts are to fight this threat even more efficiently," said Jourová.

It was found that X, which is no longer under the voluntary Code, is the worst social media platform when it comes to this practice. It was also discovered that those spreading disinformation had a lot more followers than those who did not and they tend to have joined the platform more recently.

The Code has 44 signatories, including Facebook, Google, YouTube, TikTok, and LinkedIn. Musk's platform pulled out of the Code in May, a move that followed EU warnings that a lack of moderation could be inadvertently helping Vladimir Putin as Russian propaganda relating to the war in Ukraine isn't being removed.

"Disinformation is not new, nor does it happen only on online platforms," said Jourová. "But with increasing digitalization, malicious actors have gained new ways to try to undermine our democracies."

"The Russian state has engaged in the war of ideas to pollute our information space with half-truth and lies to create a false image that democracy is no better than autocracy," she said.

Google said that between January and April this year, it removed more than 400 channels from YouTube that were involved in coordinated influence operations linked to the Russian-state-sponsored Internet Research Agency (IRA). Meta, TikTok, and Microsoft have also been pushing back against Russian propaganda.

"The Kremlin fights with bombs in Ukraine, but with words everywhere else, including in the EU," said Jourová.

X now uses Community Notes, in which users collaboratively add context to potentially misleading posts. Contributors can leave notes on any post and if enough contributors "from different points of view" rate that note as helpful, the note will be publicly shown on a post.

Not helping X's reputation is today's announcement by a research organization revealing that the platform has disabled a feature allowing users to report misinformation about elections. Reset.Tech Australia said that in the past week, the "politics" category has been removed from the drop-down menu that allows users to report posts they consider misleading. The only jurisdiction where it is still present is the European Union.

Last week's Climate of Misinformation report by Climate Action Against Disinformation ranked X the worst platform for climate change misinformation, awarding it a score of just 1 out of 21.

Permalink to story.

 
When “disinformation” is defined as anything that disagrees with the *current* government-sponsored narrative, it is not surprising the government will claim it is really really bad.

(Unless the narrative shifts to include previous disinformation as accurate, then it is ok without regard for anyone thrown under the bus for saying such things before they were government approved.)
 
The title contains ambiguity in contrast to the article content. If "it's the worst place for misinformation" it means that there is censorship or other means that prevent supposed misinformation.

It should be something like "X/Y is a fertile ground and best environment to spread misinformation"
 
Silly peasants. Only the elites know the truth.

On a side note, isn't it so polite that whenever someone disagrees we now just say it's disinformation? We used to be so much more rude as a society and call them liars.

Yea but how do I know you're not just spreading this disinformation because you don't agree with someone elses disinformation?
 
Since Americans are really just Europeans living remotely, it makes sense that the EU is playing the father figure to the US when things get out of hand.

I just hope the EU doesn't one day step out for a few minutes to get a pack of cigarettes...
 
Silly peasants. Only the elites know the truth.

On a side note, isn't it so polite that whenever someone disagrees we now just say it's disinformation? We used to be so much more rude as a society and call them liars.
I think they might both be right and wrong.
Here is what I mean.
Bots, real paid bots who live on twitter to spread literal lies regarding war and literal war criminals are there.
If you follow people who right about such stuff you can't deny those. They are like seagulls always making the same sounds.
But there is also something else, the stuff you meant. I mean people who just do not want to have anything with popular trends and opinions. While not promoting violence or harmful content, they are still seen as undesirable in many western countries by authorities.
Twitter has both categories.
EU authorities would very much like to stop bots from ever entering these platforms, just like authoritarian countries carefully block anything that goes against their power and rule on their platforms in their countries.
Bots, people paid to spread lies should be addressed, people who speak against trends and popular ideas should not.
And going back to bot problem, they are doing something very evil. As some of the people from their countries do unthinkable to other innocents people including children, these parodies of human beings rewrite who the criminals are.
 
To put it mildly, finding truth on SMPs isn't easy, but main problem for state actors seems to be their diminishing ability to 'censor' stuff which doesn't fit with their narrative at any given time; e.g. right now its Ukrainian war, which by all counts has been lost by the west despite spending hundreds of billions of dollars. It is an extremely unfortunate waste of humongous amount of money which could've been spent on helping their respective populations, who are suffering from immense inflationary pressures since 2020.
 
It also allows me to connect to my Flat Earth friends from all over the globe....

PS
I'll get me own coat....
y0sY9t6.png
 
Well, Justin Trudeau defined a couple of days ago what "disinformation" is when asked about a certain practical kind of counter-example that occurred a few days before.
 
Last edited:
To put it mildly, finding truth on SMPs isn't easy, but main problem for state actors seems to be their diminishing ability to 'censor' stuff which doesn't fit with their narrative at any given time; e.g. right now its Ukrainian war, which by all counts has been lost by the west despite spending hundreds of billions of dollars. It is an extremely unfortunate waste of humongous amount of money which could've been spent on helping their respective populations, who are suffering from immense inflationary pressures since 2020.
Helping Ukraine is only a waste of money if you don't know history or for some crazy reasons ignore it. You cannot let a dictator to conquer his neighboring countries breaking all international laws signed by his country.
This is not an inconvenience; this is how previous world wars started. And there is one to start again, only this time with a crazy dictator with nukes. He threatens the world with nukes while trying to occupy entire 45 million country after he failed to tear it from inside from 2014.
The main reason to help Ukraine was never to do it out of good heart or good intentions, there is a crazy old man whose mind was ruined by absolute power. And we made it much worse as nothing was done when he occupied parts of Georgia and then Crimea.
If you let a very bad man do evil, hoping he will eventually have enough, then you are mad. He is not going to stop. His regime kills tortures and is literally commits acts of terrorism. "Let him have those territories, then we'll have peace." As soon as he is done with Ukraine, he will start planning to connect Kenigsberg to the rest of his stinking pseudo empire or something else.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back