The Netherlands just blocked a US company from buying the app Dutch citizens use for everything

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 2,586   +973
Staff
In a nutshell: US enterprise services provider Kyndryl tried to acquire Dutch cloud specialist Solvinity, but The Hague has officially stopped the acquisition. Citing a potential security risk to the country's public interest, State Secretary for Digital Economy Willemijn Aerdts recently confirmed the takeover ban. The decision anticipates a potentially disruptive initiative designed to further promote European sovereignty in the digital market.

As far as technology is concerned, US and Europe are growing apart at an accelerated rate. EU authorities are working to build their own digital sovereignty, while member states are now actively pushing foreign buyers away when it comes to local service providers.

Kyndryl first announced the acquisition in November 2025, saying Solvinity would expand its portfolio of mission-critical enterprise and cloud services. Solvinity operates secure managed cloud platforms and supports key Dutch digital systems, including DigiD, the authentication platform widely used by Dutch citizens.

DigiD allows users to confirm their identity when interacting with public institutions and essential services, from booking medical appointments to completing housing-related transactions. Following a review by the Investment Screening Bureau (BTI), Dutch officials concluded that allowing the acquisition to proceed could weaken the country's control over an important part of its domestic cloud ecosystem.

The BTI is tasked with screening acquisitions and other major operations within the Dutch digital infrastructure. As the acquisition was going to be finalized soon, Aerdts's office was compelled to acknowledge the Bureau's advice and block the operation on May 25. Dutch officials emphasized that the review process is country-neutral and based on risk assessments, which means there are no ill intent against US companies specifically.

The Hague stressed that foreign technology firms remain welcome in the Netherlands. At the same time, the government said it must preserve an independent framework for reviewing investments that could affect national security or broader public interests.

Kyndryl, however, sharply criticized the decision, saying it was "extremely disappointed" by the intervention. The company accused Dutch authorities of politicizing a transaction it believes would have benefited both Solvinity's customers and Dutch citizens.

As a matter of fact, the clash could be an early sign of a much larger confrontation taking shape across Europe's tech sector. EU regulators are expected to unveil a new "Tech Sovereignty Package" in the near future, an initiative aimed at strengthening local cloud providers and reducing reliance on foreign Big Tech companies.

If adopted in its current form, the proposal could significantly reshape how US cloud giants such as Microsoft and Google do business in Europe, forcing new stringent requirements, particularly when handling sensitive citizen data protected under GDPR rules.

Permalink to story:

 
This reminds me of Tik Tok, which should have been likewise rejected! Trump, has soft spot for China or something. The US government should ban all visas for the Chinese. And, send the ones that are already here, packing! They (China) have redeeming value whatsoever! All they do is steal...
 
LOL this is not the US overtaking The The Netherlands, it's one company buying another.

By the way, isn't it important what the owners of the company want? Just because ... they are the owners. How come government bureaucrats have a say, while the owners don't?

If the government is unhappy about the acquisition, the proper way to handle this would be to declare it will not use the company's services anymore, if it happens. Then let the owners and the potential buyers decide if they still want the deal.
 
LOL this is not the US overtaking The The Netherlands, it's one company buying another.

By the way, isn't it important what the owners of the company want? Just because ... they are the owners. How come government bureaucrats have a say, while the owners don't?

If the government is unhappy about the acquisition, the proper way to handle this would be to declare it will not use the company's services anymore, if it happens. Then let the owners and the potential buyers decide if they still want the deal.
Impossible! Is that a valid approach?

Quickly now, tell the orange monkey he is doing stuff incorrectly (one example of many):
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2026/01/03...iefo-emcore-velocity-one-navgiation-gyro.html
 
LOL this is not the US overtaking The The Netherlands, it's one company buying another.

By the way, isn't it important what the owners of the company want? Just because ... they are the owners. How come government bureaucrats have a say, while the owners don't?

If the government is unhappy about the acquisition, the proper way to handle this would be to declare it will not use the company's services anymore, if it happens. Then let the owners and the potential buyers decide if they still want the deal.
"this is not the US overtaking" - it can definitely be seen like that if you take everything into consideration.

We are talking about essential services that the country and its citizens use. Not a candy making company. Even the US has restrictions on what "company owners" do. Didn't the US restrict the sale of routers recently?

Seriously, why are we even having this discussion dude?
 
Last edited:
LOL this is not the US overtaking The The Netherlands, it's one company buying another.

By the way, isn't it important what the owners of the company want? Just because ... they are the owners. How come government bureaucrats have a say, while the owners don't?

If the government is unhappy about the acquisition, the proper way to handle this would be to declare it will not use the company's services anymore, if it happens. Then let the owners and the potential buyers decide if they still want the deal.
LOL yes we know.

I wouldn't buy the end of a broomstick off the US today if I were in a position to make that decision.

The world is smart to distrust the US.

I live in the US.
 
LOL this is not the US overtaking The The Netherlands, it's one company buying another.

By the way, isn't it important what the owners of the company want? Just because ... they are the owners. How come government bureaucrats have a say, while the owners don't?

If the government is unhappy about the acquisition, the proper way to handle this would be to declare it will not use the company's services anymore, if it happens. Then let the owners and the potential buyers decide if they still want the deal.

I wouldn't say that so lightly...
 
Any data us company holds is by law available to us authorities. There is no way all citizens data from one country should be available to any other not unionised country. Very good this take over was prevented.
The US has the constitution and due process requires a warrant to be served for that to be true unless the company willingly hands over their data to law enforcement (uncommon). It would be extremely unusual for a company to hand over data about foreign users for an arbitrary reason, and in the end the US company has to follow European law regarding operating/handling data in Europe.

I would guess the opposite is true instead, that European governments have arbitrary access to this Solvinity’s data and blocking this purchase is a way to ensure that access continues.
 
The US has the constitution and due process requires a warrant to be served for that to be true unless the company willingly hands over their data to law enforcement (uncommon). It would be extremely unusual for a company to hand over data about foreign users for an arbitrary reason, and in the end the US company has to follow European law regarding operating/handling data in Europe.

I would guess the opposite is true instead, that European governments have arbitrary access to this Solvinity’s data and blocking this purchase is a way to ensure that access continues.
In Europe GDPR regulates very strictly who can have access and who can't. There are no legal ways for other EU governments to access any other EU country citizens private data, especially with GDPR in place. So, selling anything would not change the way data can be accessed in EU, but adds a way to access it by US government.

Additionally, US is preventing a lot of US companies purchasing by external buyers, in much less impactful areas, so even if this prevention is a bit extensive, it doesn't even match similar blocks in US, so if someone complains on a country wanting to have provider of essential services affecting all citizens not controlled by external parties, should complain much more on preventing sales of a small US drone company. Look at Emcore, Qualcomm, Lattice and more.
 
The US has the constitution and due process requires a warrant to be served for that to be true unless the company willingly hands over their data to law enforcement (uncommon). It would be extremely unusual for a company to hand over data about foreign users for an arbitrary reason, and in the end the US company has to follow European law regarding operating/handling data in Europe.

I would guess the opposite is true instead, that European governments have arbitrary access to this Solvinity’s data and blocking this purchase is a way to ensure that access continues.
Due process? In the US? that's a good joke.

"It would be extremely unusual for a company to hand over data about foreign users for an arbitrary reason" - this is fresh out of the oven:
 
...says the hive mind of the fascist-authoritarian Left.
You seem to be confused, but that's normal for maga. The worldwide consensus is that you are the fascist here. You can thank pedo Trump for this title.

Tell us more how Hitler was from the left using nothing but debunked lies. Tell us more how Hitler was "pro union" by killing union members and destroying all non-state controlled unions because of "campaign propaganda", before the nazis were elected, you read somewhere shady (probably fox news or truth social) :)
 
Due process? In the US? that's a good joke..
Yes, it's nearly as bad as it is in the EU, when they arrest you for refusing to turn over private data stored on your servers, as France did to Pavel Durov:


Or the EU's new "Data Act" which, under the guise of making user's data more accessible to them, now requires any and all private firms to release all data to government officials requesting it, with no due process or warrant required, as long as that official says they need it badly enough:

 
LOL yes we know.

I wouldn't buy the end of a broomstick off the US today if I were in a position to make that decision.

The world is smart to distrust the US.

I live in the US.

The US isn’t that bad - that doomerism is spreading like cancer on social media, particularly Reddit, and it isn’t accurate nor rational.
 
Yes, it's nearly as bad as it is in the EU, when they arrest you for refusing to turn over private data stored on your servers, as France did to Pavel Durov:


Or the EU's new "Data Act" which, under the guise of making user's data more accessible to them, now requires any and all private firms to release all data to government officials requesting it, with no due process or warrant required, as long as that official says they need it badly enough:

Ah yes, the usual "I quote something" and "I say thing" without actually researching.

You found a dumb blog (an UBER dumb post at that) post that doesn't understand anything about what's happening with the Telegram CEO and is jumping to the usual maga conclusions.

I won't even bother telling you why this time. It's just that dumb of an blog post. Seriously, is this where you are getting all of your information? If so then you have major issues dude.

You've become so predictable. And you still support pedophiles and fascists after being made fun of here for so long.

As for the EU data act... Where are you getting that information? Another dumb blog post? You clearly have ZERO understand of what it is and what it does. No, it does not give governments access to user data. That's just dumb. There is only one exception under the "Exceptional Need" in public emergencies which is very strictly regulated. All data requests must adhere to GDPR policy.

Go read what the EU Data Act does before you embarrass yourself further.
 
As for the EU data act... Where are you getting that information? Another dumb blog post? You clearly have ZERO understand of what it is and what it does. No, it does not give governments access to user data. Go read what the EU Data Act does before you embarrass yourself further.
"Yes, the EU Data Act gives government access to data stored on private servers, when:

- a public sector body, the Commission, the European Central Bank or a Union body is acting on the basis of Union or national law and has identified specific data, the lack of which prevents it from fulfilling a specific task carried out in the public interest, that has been explicitly provided for by law, such as the production of official statistics or the mitigation of or recovery from a public emergency...."


The language is clear. The phrase "such as" is in legal terms, an "illustrative example", not a restrictive case. Under current EU law, if any public sector or union body says they have a "specific task" which is in their opinion "in the public interest", the data must be released. Period.

You found a dumb blog (an UBER dumb post at that) post that doesn't understand anything about what's happening with the Telegram CEO and is jumping to the usual maga conclusions.
Actually, I've been following the Durov case since France first began pressuring him to release all the private encryption keys stored on Telegram servers, months before they arrested him on trumped up charges.

You've become so predictable. And you still support pedophiles and fascists
You derail every thread on this forum with your talk of pedophilia. I advise you to seek professional help. For my part, I'm simply glad I don't live in Romania, the top child sex trafficking hot-spot on the continent.

 
Last edited:
Back