The Outer Worlds 2 is officially Microsoft's first $80 game

midian182

Posts: 10,781   +142
Staff member
A hot potato: The economy is shaky, AI is taking jobs, and people are tightening their belts, which means there's never been a better time for Microsoft to reveal its first $80 game. The Redmond firm has confirmed that The Outer Worlds 2 will be priced at $79.99 in the US, making it the first Xbox Game Studios title to adopt this unwelcome price point.

This doesn't come as a shock, of course. A few weeks ago, Microsoft announced a number of price hikes across its Xbox hardware and software lineup, which it blamed on market pressures and rising development costs.

In addition to more expensive Xbox consoles, Microsoft said it plans to standardize pricing for some of its upcoming first-party game releases at $79.99.

The first of these titles will be The Outer Worlds 2. It launches on October 29, 2025, falling into the holiday season period that Microsoft said would be when the price increases arrive. In addition to the $79.99/£69.99 standard version, there will also be a special edition that costs $100.

Microsoft is unlikely to be overly worried about the blowback over the price. As an Xbox Game Studios title, it will launch straight into the PC/Xbox Game Pass service on day one. As is the case whenever a AAA title lands on the service, expect to see plenty of people take out subscriptions to play the game instead of handing over the retail amount.

The first Outer Worlds was one of those games that received mostly good to excellent reviews but didn't set the world on fire. Unsurprisingly, some users are review bombing the original game on Steam in response to its sequel's $80 price tag.

Obsidian, developer of both games, is also launching Grounded 2 this year. At $29.99, it's more than 60% cheaper than The Outer Worlds 2.

It's not just Microsoft pushing up the standard cost of AAA games. Nintendo got there first when it announced that every first-party Switch 2 game would cost $70 or $80 – Mario Kart World falls into the latter category.

There's been plenty of anger over increasing game prices. It's led to some within the industry trying to justify them, unsuccessfully. Gearbox CEO Randy Pitchford, for example, said "real fans" would find a way to get hold of Borderland 4 if it costs $80.

There have also been plenty of rumors about GTA VI costing more than $80. One analyst wrote that developers and publishers "hope" that the game could cost as much as $100 when it arrives, as such a move could embolden other companies to start charging even more for their games.

Many companies cite large development teams and rising production costs as justification for price hikes. However, it's worth noting that three of the best-selling titles of 2025 so far – Clair Obscur: Expedition 33, Split Fiction, and Blue Prince – are all budget releases.

Permalink to story:

 
I put 12hrs into the first one and just didn't care to keep going. Something felt missing compared to older games in the genre.

At this point, I don't think I'd even try it if I got Game Pass.
 
The economy is not shaky. Go look at the numbers don't regurgitate talking points. Do right by your readers, print the truth and you will be better off. Inflation way down, energy prices down, tariff speculation on the stock market all wrong, wages up, civilian employment up!! Those are not indicators of shaky Rob.
 
The first Outer Worlds was never worth $60.
The re-release, which no one asked for, was objectively worse than the original game.
The second won't be worth $80.

The most remarkable thing about the Outer Worlds franchise is the hollow gameplay and bold pricing.
 
Games been the least inflationary tbh
the problem is not many games worth playing
the last game I enjoyed was cyberpunk 2077
anymore suggestions? tried outer worlds after finished cyberpunk 2077 but couldn't finish it because couldn't stand the loadings and stalely staged scenes...
 
Too many games out there that are heavily discounted and in the backlog to consider before jumping in and be a premium beta tester.
 
80$ for this game is asking way too much. And it will put off most people from buying it.
I can already see very poor sales at launch for it. But then someone at Xbox or Obsidian will claim the game has 1 million players, ignoring that most are on Gamepass, paying a fraction of original price.
 
The economy is not shaky. Go look at the numbers don't regurgitate talking points. Do right by your readers, print the truth and you will be better off. Inflation way down, energy prices down, tariff speculation on the stock market all wrong, wages up, civilian employment up!! Those are not indicators of shaky Rob.

Job growth down, economic growth down, inflation still higher then the Feds baseline (and not any lower then the last guy), and the markets will nosedive the second tariffs come back when Trump throws another temper tantrum.
 
The economy is not shaky. Go look at the numbers don't regurgitate talking points. Do right by your readers, print the truth and you will be better off. Inflation way down, energy prices down, tariff speculation on the stock market all wrong, wages up, civilian employment up!! Those are not indicators of shaky Rob.
Inflation way down?
Energy prices down?
Tarifft speculation on the stock market all wrong?

I see how people love drinking that Trump's Kool Aid
 
Last edited:
I don't see any cutting edge graphical development or engine improvements. What's the $80 for? Looks like they just used a bunch of existing assets and built on the existing world. Seems like a cash grab.
 
$80 - no thanks. Like number one I will wait for it to appear in a humble bundle or Steam sale. There is no good reason for $80 (when games came in big boxes with manuals, artwork, cloth maps and costs to distribute games was not a small percentage of cost of sale - $50 was full price and you got a lot for that price). So assuming copying onto physical media, packaging and distribution costs were 40% (probably closer to 50% - hence why Steam charged 30% - a big saving) then the game itself cost $30 including profit. $30 in 1991 = $70 now so Microsoft are charging an extra $10 over inflation (given the reduction in packaging and distribution costs).
 
Does anyone actually pay $80 given how cheap game pass is?
if my only choices were to buy games full price or forever be hitched up to a subscription service, then I'd buy games full price.

I mean I already do, but you get my meaning.

not everything since sales are so plentiful and happen so soon after some games debut. but I just dont have it in me to cheer for any subscription services since once you quit paying you have nothing.
 
The economy is not shaky. Go look at the numbers don't regurgitate talking points. Do right by your readers, print the truth and you will be better off. Inflation way down, energy prices down, tariff speculation on the stock market all wrong, wages up, civilian employment up!! Those are not indicators of shaky Rob.
Credit card debt is at an all time high.
Auto repos are at an all time high.
Foreclosures are rising.
Home sales are tanking.

This is not a healthy economy. Wages are rising, but not as fast as inflation. Profits are huge, but that's because of gouging, actual unit sales are down. Interest rates on debt is still way up.
The first Outer Worlds was never worth $60.
The re-release, which no one asked for, was objectively worse than the original game.
The second won't be worth $80.

The most remarkable thing about the Outer Worlds franchise is the hollow gameplay and bold pricing.
This. Obsidian is not the same Obsidian that made New Vegas or KOTOR II. Just like bungie, DICE, bioware, treyarc, blizzard, ece.

Outer worlds 1 was so....bland. "LOL capitalism" as a joke lasted all of 2 minutes, they didnt do ANYTHING interesting with it, all the characters suffer from terminal millennial writing, and the world is static and lifeless.

They'll be announcing 3 million "players" to cover up atrocious sales numbers within a month, just like they did with DOOM dark ages.
 
Does anyone actually pay $80 given how cheap game pass is?
If you buy a couple of discounted games per year, what point is even paying 20 per month?
There are a lot of people who have not bought a full price AAA game in years.
I myself always preferred small indie games, modded old games. The only exception that I had was FIFA which they f**d up completely in 2023 therefore I dropped it.
 
It's not the first... the most recent Microsoft Flight Simulator is also 80€ (despite most customers on Steam not recommending it, they've got some balls).

Either way, it's WAY too much for a game. Especially an Outer Worlds game given its track record, but it's too much for any game. 70€ is also too much. I'm not paying either.
 
Haha I already never buy games at new prices even if its something I really love. Also will only buy games from GOG there is no way I am going to play a game that will have severs shut down and lose all my games whenever they go out of business or no longer want to support servers. I would rather go play another round of terror from the deep or something else iconic than waste 80 bucks on something that will be half or even more off in a year.
 
If you buy a couple of discounted games per year, what point is even paying 20 per month?
There are a lot of people who have not bought a full price AAA game in years.
I myself always preferred small indie games, modded old games. The only exception that I had was FIFA which they f**d up completely in 2023 therefore I dropped it.
Man I average like, 1 game a year. Only year I spent more than $60 on games was when all the star wars games got GoG releases.

IDK how people have the time to make gamepass worth it. You gotta play a LOT.
 
My pronouns are nonbuynary when it comes to games released in the past few years. The only games I've bought recently are Helldivers 2 and the glorious Yasuke Simulator.

I will not buy GTA VI as I haven't played GTA V (Online) for years due to the cheaters and how boring the game is.
 
I liked the first game as it was nice in 2019, when I bought it new on sale at Epic for $15 less than Microsoft was charging. Graphics were very nice at the time, I thought. But this trailer looks awful, absolutely awful, I hate to say. The first game was fairly original and had a bunch of mysteries to solve, IIRC. This looks like maybe a half-dozen other games they sort of copied and then threw together with an exceedingly poor rendering of the first game. Too bad, as I was looking forward to this one. Not anymore. I'll pass.
 
Back