The US just approved its first small nuclear reactor built for the AI power crunch

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,295   +64
Staff
Forward-looking: The Tennessee Valley Authority has received the federal go-ahead to build a BWRX-300 small modular reactor at its Clinch River site near Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The approval makes TVA the first US utility authorized to build the GE Vernova Hitachi reactor design, one of several small reactor technologies now being positioned as a source of round-the-clock power for a grid facing fast-rising demand.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission completed its review in 14 months, four months ahead of schedule. The permit gives TVA the green light to construct the 300-megawatt unit, but the utility will still need a separate operating license before it can load fuel or generate electricity. "This construction permit is more than a regulatory achievement – it's foundational for America's nuclear future," TVA interim president Mike Skaggs said in a statement.

The BWRX-300 is based on boiling-water reactor technology, which has been used in commercial nuclear plants for decades. It is designed to produce 300 megawatts of electricity, or about one-fourth the output of the newest large reactors at Georgia's Vogtle plant.

The technology is meant to simplify the traditional reactor model. The BWRX-300 uses water as a coolant and relies on natural circulation to move water through the system. Its design also incorporates passive safety features that can use gravity, pressure and stored water rather than depending entirely on powered equipment.

GE Vernova Hitachi and its utility customers are betting that a smaller reactor can be built with fewer components, a smaller footprint and more factory-made parts. That could reduce construction time and make projects easier to finance. It remains an unproven argument in the United States, where large nuclear projects have often run late and far over budget.

TVA is evaluating the possibility of building as many as four BWRX-300 units at Clinch River. The utility has not set a construction start date or disclosed a final cost estimate.

The main appeal of the BWRX-300 is not simply its size. It is the prospect of building multiple units from the same design.

Ontario Power Generation is preparing to build a fleet of BWRX-300 reactors in Canada and has installed the foundation for its first unit. TVA and Ontario Power Generation expect that using the same reactor design could help lower costs through shared procurement, manufacturing and construction experience.

Blue Energy is taking a similar approach in Texas. The company has applied for a permit to build BWRX-300 reactors intended to serve data centers and says it plans to manufacture reactor components at scale.

That push reflects growing concern over the power demands of AI data centers. Grid operators and utilities are looking for generation that can operate around the clock without relying on weather conditions. Nuclear power is one of the few low-carbon options that can provide steady output, although new plants remain expensive and slow to build.

Cost is the main driver behind the industry's effort to revive nuclear construction. Vogtle's two newest reactors cost roughly $35 billion and entered service years behind schedule. Developers of small modular reactors say standardized designs and factory production can avoid some of the problems that affected Vogtle.

That claim will be tested at Clinch River. TVA's approval lets the utility begin construction, but the project still must prove the BWRX-300 can be built on time and at a cost utilities and large electricity users will accept.

Permalink to story:

 
And we thought the 'no data center' movement was bad.

Someone somewhere will find a way to regulate it out of existence. :(
 
Great news!
The NRC review in 14 months is a truly shocking improvement over the usual 40+ years until recently, but it should be shortened to max. 3 months.
 
I mean...there could be other things this reactor could do, ya know...1 MW is good enough to power around 600 homes....just saying. Instead of data centers and electric companies (I'm looking at you OEC) cant hold power monopolies in states/counties/towns.
 
If it wasn't for that movie "The China Syndrome", Chernobyl (which used a really outdated design & poor backups), Three Mile Island (which proved the safety features do work), and the Fukushima disaster (who in their right mind puts a generator in an area that can be flooded by water), nuclear power would be all over the place.
There is one in our state that has been running without problems for over 40 years.
 
Lovely. So when it comes to big corporations and AI we can get nuclear made. Cheap electricity for millions of people though? No can do.
 
Passive safety features being a really good thing. The more the merrier. Pity that it will probably not be 100% air-gapped. For when, eventually, the Chinese / Russian / Iranian scumbag hackers come calling, trying their best to disrupt and destroy anything good.
 
Oh well, when the AI goes self-aware it can duplicate itself across the networks then use it's own power supply to slag the US.
 
Fourteen months and four months ahead of schedule from the NRC is the most surprising part of this story. A government agency finishing early? Check the calendar, something's wrong.
 
2 problems that this supposed approval don’t solve for AI data Center providers,
1. It takes time to build and inspected.This is not something that is approved and comes online in a year.

2. It does not address the issue where existing cables/ infrastructure is still not ready to for a surge in power transmission. So while everyone tech company talks about producing power, I’ve yet to see anyone tackle ageing grids that are not designed to rapidly increase power transmission. And this alone may take longer than building power plants.

Hence, I never find these tech companies serious about delivering AI because it’s something great. It’s more about floating some “great tech that will save or destroy the world”, grab the money and run. If not, all these serious bottlenecks should have been identified with these “great minds” and “amazing technology” to figure out what is required.
 
2 problems that this supposed approval don’t solve for AI data Center providers,
1. It takes time to build and inspected.This is not something that is approved and comes online in a year.

2. It does not address the issue where existing cables/ infrastructure is still not ready to for a surge in power transmission. So while everyone tech company talks about producing power, I’ve yet to see anyone tackle ageing grids that are not designed to rapidly increase power transmission. And this alone may take longer than building power plants.

Hence, I never find these tech companies serious about delivering AI because it’s something great. It’s more about floating some “great tech that will save or destroy the world”, grab the money and run. If not, all these serious bottlenecks should have been identified with these “great minds” and “amazing technology” to figure out what is required.
Point 3. Water. How much? Where from? And how much will be recoverable in the system to lessen using more of our drinking water?
 
2. It does not address the issue where existing cables/ infrastructure is still not ready to for a surge in power transmission. So while everyone tech company talks about producing power, I’ve yet to see anyone tackle ageing grids that are not designed to rapidly increase power transmission. And this alone may take longer than building power plants.
The keyword is "local"
When you build power plant near to Datacenter, you do not have to solve connection to the grid (for full scale delivery).

Hence, I never find these tech companies serious about delivering AI because it’s something great. It’s more about floating some “great tech that will save or destroy the world”, grab the money and run. If not, all these serious bottlenecks should have been identified with these “great minds” and “amazing technology” to figure out what is required.
Do not worry.
They figured it out.
Long time ago.
They just are trying ways how to let somebody else pay for it.
 
Back