The US just banned Chinese humanoid robots and power inverters over security fears

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,182   +62
Staff
What just happened? The federal government is moving to block a new category of connected technology from entering the US, focusing on robotics and energy equipment tied to artificial intelligence systems. The Federal Communications Commission on Tuesday approved restrictions banning imports of new humanoid and quadruped robots, along with connected power inverters used in renewable energy and data center operations. The rules apply to products that have not yet been authorized for sale in the US and took effect immediately.

Regulators say the goal is to reduce security risks tied to devices that are increasingly embedded in critical infrastructure and AI workflows. The FCC said these devices pose potential supply chain vulnerabilities that could undermine both the US economy and national security while also introducing cybersecurity risks to critical infrastructure.

Chairman Brendan Carr added that the agency intends to remain actively involved in efforts to protect and secure key supply chains in the United States.

The scope of the rule is broad. The FCC defines "advanced robotic devices" as machines that can move, sense their surroundings, and connect to networks. That includes not only humanoid robots but also a wider range of mobile systems, potentially extending to future consumer devices if they meet those criteria.

The inclusion of power inverters shows how closely energy infrastructure has become tied to AI.

Inverters are used to connect solar arrays, batteries, and other power sources to the grid and to large facilities such as data centers. As AI development drives a surge in data center construction, officials are paying closer attention to the equipment that keeps those facilities running.

While the FCC did not name a specific country, the impact is expected to fall heavily on Chinese manufacturers. China is a major producer of both robotics and inverters, with companies such as Sungrow and Huawei leading the global inverter market.

The robotics side could affect companies such as Unitree, a major player in the humanoid robot market. The company has also drawn scrutiny in Washington after being placed on a Pentagon list of alleged Chinese military-backed firms. Unitree has partnered with Nvidia to use its Blackwell chips in robotic systems.

US officials have raised concerns about how these machines collect and transmit data. The FCC said the devices can gather data that could be used by bad actors for surveillance, to support foreign intelligence efforts, or even to remotely control the robots. Representative John Moolenaar said the restrictions are intended to safeguard the country and bolster the domestic robotics industry.

The inverter restrictions come amid similar concerns. Chinese manufacturers have expanded their presence in Western markets, in part by lowering prices, but regulators worry about potential vulnerabilities, including the risk of remote access or malware. Officials have pointed to past incidents, including the "Volt Typhoon" hacking campaign, in which compromised devices were used to mask attacks on US infrastructure.

The policy also reflects a broader effort to avoid dependence on foreign-controlled supply chains. US officials have cited China's dominance in rare-earth minerals as an example of how control over key components can become a geopolitical tool.

Companies will have some room to maneuver. The FCC is expected to allow waivers for certain products, particularly those from non-Chinese suppliers. However, companies seeking approval will likely need to demonstrate plans to move manufacturing to the US, aligning with the administration's push to reshore critical industries.

Products already approved for sale in the US are not immediately affected. They can continue to operate and receive updates through January 1, 2029, although the FCC has the authority to revisit those approvals.

China pushed back on the move. The Chinese embassy in Washington said it "urges the United States to heed the objective and rational voices of the business communities in both countries" and "stop smearing Chinese companies and threatening them with sanctions." It added that China will "take all necessary measures in response to any action that causes material harm to its interests."

The restrictions mark a more assertive step in US tech policy as AI systems become increasingly dependent on physical infrastructure. For regulators, the issue is no longer just software or data, but also the hardware that connects them – and where that hardware is built.

Permalink to story:

 
I swear the US just bans things that makes them look behind the curve.
Anyone not living under a rock already knows the last three major router-based cyberattacks were all performed via backdoors written into Chinese routers. And multiple Chinese-based products have already been found to be secretly transmitting private data back to China: everything from home security products to smart watches to the TikTok app itself.
 
Anyone not living under a rock already knows the last three major router-based cyberattacks were all performed via backdoors written into Chinese routers. And multiple Chinese-based products have already been found to be secretly transmitting private data back to China: everything from home security products to smart watches to the TikTok app itself.
Right. Only the US is allowed to spy on other countries citizens.
 
Europe doesn’t allow Tesla FSD except for a few countries. Even China allows it. These are the 5 European countries that allow FSD on their roads: Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Lithuania, and the Netherlands.
Because it didn’t meet safety standards, others that met the standards did. Having a crappy product isn’t an excuse
 
Anyone not living under a rock already knows the last three major router-based cyberattacks were all performed via backdoors written into Chinese routers. And multiple Chinese-based products have already been found to be secretly transmitting private data back to China: everything from home security products to smart watches to the TikTok app itself.
Any evidence at all?
 
Right. Only the US is allowed to spy on other countries citizens.
The US doesn't keep three million of its own citizens in slave labor genocide camps. The US doesn't employ an army of two million people to do nothing but censor what people can see on the Internet. The US doesn't drive armored tanks over teenage protestors in public squares.

Because it didn’t meet safety standards, others that met the standards did. Having a crappy product isn’t an excuse
You do love spreading disinformation, don't you? There are no "other" self-driving cars that the EU has approved. Nor has the EU rejected Tesla FSD; it is, in fact, set to vote on allowing it across the entire bloc later this year. The primary concern expressed so far is that, while FSD itself won't exceed speed limits, Tesla doesn't prohibit drivers themselves from doing so.

Now, tell us again how Linus Torvald "can't program in Linux".

Any evidence at all?
Anyone not living under a rock always knows all this is fact.

"Malicious access to consumer routers has been directly linked by U.S. investigations to three major Chinese state-sponsored campaigns: Volt Typhoon, Flax Typhoon, and Salt Typhoon. Hackers utilized these compromised devices as covert proxy networks to hide their origin while targeting critical infrastructure..."

"Internet-connected Chinese cameras lack robust security and communicate by default with overseas servers, risking critical infrastructure espionage... The US, UK, and Australia have removed or banned equipment from state-linked makers like Hikvision and Dahua on sensitive government properties. [1]..."

"...TikTok does transmit and allow access to user data involving China, a practice confirmed by regulatory investigations and corporate admissions, despite the company's repeated denials and claims that foreign user data is kept locally...."





 
The US doesn't keep three million of its own citizens in slave labor genocide camps. The US doesn't employ an army of two million people to do nothing but censor what people can see on the Internet. The US doesn't drive armored tanks over teenage protestors in public squares.


You do love spreading disinformation, don't you? There are no "other" self-driving cars that the EU has approved. Nor has the EU rejected Tesla FSD; it is, in fact, set to vote on allowing it across the entire bloc later this year. The primary concern expressed so far is that, while FSD itself won't exceed speed limits, Tesla doesn't prohibit drivers themselves from doing so.
Mercedes has been doing it since 2021 when they got SAE L3 status. Tesla is still L2, five years later. Maybe look at news outside your oligarchy.
Now, tell us again how Linus Torvald "can't program in Linux".
Linus Torvalds: Um, I read email. I read email, I write email, I do no coding at all any more”
Anyone not living under a rock always knows all this is fact.

"Malicious access to consumer routers has been directly linked by U.S. investigations to three major Chinese state-sponsored campaigns: Volt Typhoon, Flax Typhoon, and Salt Typhoon. Hackers utilized these compromised devices as covert proxy networks to hide their origin while targeting critical infrastructure..."

"Internet-connected Chinese cameras lack robust security and communicate by default with overseas servers, risking critical infrastructure espionage... The US, UK, and Australia have removed or banned equipment from state-linked makers like Hikvision and Dahua on sensitive government properties. [1]..."

"...TikTok does transmit and allow access to user data involving China, a practice confirmed by regulatory investigations and corporate admissions, despite the company's repeated denials and claims that foreign user data is kept locally...."





Ah yes. YouTubers and quotes from an administration who cannot tell you if Trump can run for a third term. Those are some good sources.
 
All those flock cameras are mostly made in China, how come those get to proliferate and not be deemed a security risk. Asking for Big Brother… /s
 
All those flock cameras are mostly made in China, how come those get to proliferate and not be deemed a security risk. Asking for Big Brother… /s
Odd. I see massive pushback on flock in every community its being implemented in. Its even in the news how vigilante's are breaking them, vandalizing them and destroying them.

There is massive hoopla about security concerns with flock but its mostly been about tracking and sharing data with immigration services as well as other agencies. Not just for tracking speeders.
 
Mercedes has been doing it since 2021 when they got SAE L3 status. Tesla is still L2, five years later. Maybe look at news outside your oligarchy.
Oops again!

December 2025: "Mercedes-Benz has paused its rollouts and dropped its SAE Level 3 system from all upcoming vehicles, citing high development costs and low customer demand.....
"


Linus Torvalds: Um, I read email. I read email, I write email, I do no coding at all any more”
Your claim was that Torvalds "couldn't program in Linux" because "he hasn't done anything in 30 years". Torvalds remains to date the lead developer and project coordinator for the Linux kernel, viewing, approving, and merging thousands of code changes per year. You honestly couldn't possibly have made a more absurd statement.

Ah yes. YouTubers and quotes from a [Trump] administration
Why do you continue to deny reality? Since when did the AP wire citing European officials to be "The Trump Administration"? Even more ridiculous is your missing the fact that the US DOJ and CISA investigations into CCP responsibility for cyberattacks like Volt Typhoon came during 2024, when a different individual than Trump was in the White House. Can you name who that was?

 
Oops again!

December 2025: "Mercedes-Benz has paused its rollouts and dropped its SAE Level 3 system from all upcoming vehicles, citing high development costs and low customer demand....."
Your point being? The point was that the systems for FSD exist and had approval if they were good enough. Tesla’s currently isn’t, it’s not being held back as you claimed it’s just not up to snuff.
Your claim was that Torvalds "couldn't program in Linux" because "he hasn't done anything in 30 years". Torvalds remains to date the lead developer and project coordinator for the Linux kernel, viewing, approving, and merging thousands of code changes per year. You honestly couldn't possibly have made a more absurd statement.
No I said it’s not the 90’s anymore and he no longer programs for Linux which has been true for the last at least 10 years as stated by the man himself. Take the L my dude.
Why do you continue to deny reality? Since when did the AP wire citing European officials to be "The Trump Administration"? Even more ridiculous is your missing the fact that the US DOJ and CISA investigations into CCP responsibility for cyberattacks like Volt Typhoon came during 2024, when a different individual than Trump was in the White House. Can you name who that was?
You’re literally linking reports and using the administration’s quotes they contain and nothing else.
Doubling down isn’t really going to help both here
 
Your point being?
Wasn't it obvious? No FSD 3 systems are currently for sale in the EU.

The point was that the systems for FSD exist and had approval if they were good enough. Tesla’s currently isn’t, it’s not being held back as you claimed it’s just not up to snuff.
Again incorrect. The EU has never rejected Tesla's application; they've simply stalled on approving it (they're due to vote in October). And the process has taken so long, in fact, that FIVE separate EU nations have independently approved Tesla's FSD.

No I said it’s not the 90’s anymore and he no longer programs for Linux which has been true for the last at least 10 years as stated by the man himself.
No, you said "software has moved on", claiming that Torvalds could still program is like claiming a hardware engineer from the 1980s could design and build a computer today.

You’re literally linking reports and using the administration’s quotes they contain and nothing else.
Learn to read. This link is an AP report about an European Union investigation:


This link is from the Biden Administration, not Trump as you claimed:


This link is a JOINT advisory against Chinese hacking, released by multiple agencies in the US, the Netherlands, Spain, Germany, Japan, Australia, New Zealand and Sweden:


This report is from the private group Intrusion Truth:


This is private reports about the CCP firm KnownSec, and their hacking attacks against the West:


Another private report of Chinese consumer electronics sending private data to CCP-linked entities:

 
Mercedes has been doing it since 2021 when they got SAE L3 status. Tesla is still L2, five years later. Maybe look at news outside your oligarchy.
That's not a self-driving system lol. Sure it requires no supervision, but you have to drive way more than someone using Tesla FSD because it works on less than 1% of road networks. All Mercedes did was code something that technically fits SAE L3 in name only, just to claim they got there first (Audi tried the same thing and also canceled it).

MB completely gave up on their old assistance software you describe. Their first self-driving feature relies on technology built on top of American open-source software by Nvidia. It requires hands-on supervision, so by your "outside the oligarchy" standards it is SAE L2. Does that make it a step back? I don't think so; it is clearly far more capable than MB's discarded L3 system.

Even with a German company building it, availability was only originally announced in China and the US: https://group.mercedes-benz.com/technology/autonomous-driving/driving/mb-drive-assist-pro.html
Months later, Mercedes Benz did announce extremely limited availability in Europe 2026-2027: https://www.reuters.com/business/me...tonomous-driving-germany-end-year-2026-05-22/
Reuters only puts in a heading "Europe follows the US and China", but Automotive News bluntly announces "Mercedes to launch urban assisted driving system in Germany this year after China, U.S. rollouts": https://www.autonews.com/mercedes-benz/ane-mercedes-urban-automated-driving-germany-0526/

So to the original comment you made: "I swear the US just bans things that makes them look behind the curve."
Mercedes Benz banned its own L3 system that made them look behind the curve, and adopted American technology that MB is releasing in the US and China before Europe. Besides, how many Chinese humanoid robots and connected power inverters are available in Europe versus FSD-capable Teslas in Europe?
 
That's not a self-driving system lol. Sure it requires no supervision, but you have to drive way more than someone using Tesla FSD because it works on less than 1% of road networks. All Mercedes did was code something that technically fits SAE L3 in name only, just to claim they got there first (Audi tried the same thing and also canceled it).

MB completely gave up on their old assistance software you describe. Their first self-driving feature relies on technology built on top of American open-source software by Nvidia. It requires hands-on supervision, so by your "outside the oligarchy" standards it is SAE L2. Does that make it a step back? I don't think so; it is clearly far more capable than MB's discarded L3 system.

Even with a German company building it, availability was only originally announced in China and the US: https://group.mercedes-benz.com/technology/autonomous-driving/driving/mb-drive-assist-pro.html
Months later, Mercedes Benz did announce extremely limited availability in Europe 2026-2027: https://www.reuters.com/business/me...tonomous-driving-germany-end-year-2026-05-22/
Reuters only puts in a heading "Europe follows the US and China", but Automotive News bluntly announces "Mercedes to launch urban assisted driving system in Germany this year after China, U.S. rollouts": https://www.autonews.com/mercedes-benz/ane-mercedes-urban-automated-driving-germany-0526/

So to the original comment you made: "I swear the US just bans things that makes them look behind the curve."
Mercedes Benz banned its own L3 system that made them look behind the curve, and adopted American technology that MB is releasing in the US and China before Europe. Besides, how many Chinese humanoid robots and connected power inverters are available in Europe versus FSD-capable Teslas in Europe?
Aside from the fact you’re misrepresenting pretty much everything sure 👍
 
Aside from the fact you’re misrepresenting pretty much everything sure 👍
If you want anyone to believe what you say, you should find opposing evidence and present it. I'm willing to have my mind changed, although it's funny you're claiming I'm misrepresenting things in spite of me citing Mercedes Benz itself. So why is Mecredes Benz not releasing its self-driving system in Europe first?
 
If you want anyone to believe what you say, you should find opposing evidence and present it. I'm willing to have my mind changed, although it's funny you're claiming I'm misrepresenting things in spite of me citing Mercedes Benz itself. So why is Mecredes Benz not releasing its self-driving system in Europe first?
Mate you’re literally saying that Tesla’s FSD is more like FSD despite you having to effectively shadow drive the entire way which means you might as well just drive. Merc have effectively canned it becaure FSD doesn’t really work in Europe, mainly because roads aren’t just in grids and there’s a lot of contextual elements to driving whereas in America there’s literally a sign telling you to do everything.
 
Huawei, just add a third arm in the middle of your robots forehead and it won't be humanoid any more - problem solved. Also it would really help it solve Rubik's Cubes quickly.
 
Back