The US will let private companies hack back at cybercriminals for the first time

midian182

Posts: 11,825   +179
Staff member
What we know so far: Private companies in the US have traditionally been allowed to defend their own networks from bad actors, but launching their own attacks against hackers has been out of the question. That's about to change. A new White House program will let vetted security firms surveil, disrupt, and even destroy overseas cybercriminal infrastructure while operating under federal authority.

President Donald Trump signed the National Security Presidential Memorandum on Wednesday. The move marks the first time the federal government has authorized private companies to conduct offensive cyber operations.

The targets will be foreign cyber-enabled transnational criminal organizations that attack US people, businesses, or government bodies. The White House highlighted ransomware, phishing, financial fraud, sextortion, and impersonation scams as examples.

The Homeland Security Task Force's National Coordination Center will run the program, overseen jointly by executive directors from the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security.

Participating firms must contract with one department and pass vetting covering technical ability, operational experience, facility security, and personnel.

Rules are due within 60 days and must accommodate both large companies and smaller specialists.

Authorized companies will be able to perform covert cyber surveillance, including accessing systems without the owner's permission. They may also conduct more aggressive cyber effects operations that manipulate, disrupt, deny, degrade, or destroy systems, networks, infrastructure, and data.

The memorandum isn't a blanket license to hack the hackers. Every operation requires written approval and must remain under federal supervision. Program directors can't authorize actions likely to kill or seriously injure someone, or amount to a use of force or armed attack under international law. A firm that accidentally targets a US person or US-based system must stop and immediately report it.

Companies may also be required to place at least $1 million in a bond or escrow account, forfeitable for breaking their agreements.

Allowing firms to fight back might sound like a good thing, but there are some obvious risks. Criminals frequently route attacks through compromised systems belonging to innocent parties, creating the possibility of collateral damage.

It can also be difficult to determine whether a gang is connected to a foreign government, while the memo assumes it is independent unless clear intelligence proves otherwise.

Legal experts warn that participating staff could face prosecution abroad. There are also fears about escalation, unintended consequences, and poor interagency coordination.

"President Trump is unleashing every available tool to stop foreign-based organized criminal organizations that exploit Americans in cyberspace," the White House wrote in a fact sheet.

Permalink to story:

 
Will they also be allowed to use illegal stimulants?
I'm assuming the "other side" will happily hack 24/7 for a week or more if necessary, and probably even enjoy it. Especially the North Koreans.
Beating them with coffee-fueled monday to friday/9 to 5 employees may not work as intended.

Mind you, the other side's hacker lifestyle as described is unhealthy as **** but that's a non-issue here.
Report
 
Will they also be allowed to use illegal stimulants?
I'm assuming the "other side" will happily hack 24/7 for a week or more if necessary, and probably even enjoy it. Especially the North Koreans.
Beating them with coffee-fueled monday to friday/9 to 5 employees may not work as intended.

Mind you, the other side's hacker lifestyle as described is unhealthy as **** but that's a non-issue here.
Report
I think a lot of the hacking can be done with the latest frontier AI models, which can find and chain zero day attacks against systems thousands of times faster than the most skilled and sophisticated human hackers. We're entering an entirely new world of cyber warfare.
 
So long as there is some kind of accountability if counter-hacking causes issues, which there almost certainly won't be.

It's not an inherently bad idea, but like a lot of Trump admin ideas, the proof will be in the execution.
 
Soooo. since a LOT of that network crims use is CONSUMER and CORPORATE resources IN THE US that have been compromised I CANNOT wait for the trillion dollar lawsuits that this will bring about...

/popcorn ready/
 
Private companies were forbidden from doing so. What Trump has done is to allow private companies to hack back at cybercriminals.
And you really think the U.S weren't already directing private companies in doing the hacking under the radar???

You would be naive to think that.
 
Back