UCF graduates boo commencement speaker for calling AI "the next industrial revolution"

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,010   +58
Staff
A hot potato: A commencement speech at the University of Central Florida this month took an unexpected turn when artificial intelligence became the focal point – and the flashpoint – of the ceremony. Gloria Caulfield, VP of strategic alliances at Tavistock Group, was addressing graduates from UCF's College of Arts and Humanities and the Nicholson School of Communication and Media when she introduced a familiar industry perspective: AI as a transformative force. "And let's face it, change can be daunting. The rise of artificial intelligence is the next industrial revolution," she said.

The crowd did not take the comments quietly. What began as scattered murmurs quickly built into loud, sustained boos.

Caulfield paused, visibly reacting to the response. "Oh, what happened?" she said, turning with her hands out. "Okay, I struck a chord. May I finish?" At least one person in the audience shouted back, "AI sucks!"

The exchange, caught on the UCF livestream, highlighted tensions as AI increasingly affects writing, analysis, and communication jobs. Caulfield tried to steady the room by acknowledging the reaction without backing away from her point.

"Only a few years ago, AI was not a factor in our lives," she said, drawing applause. But when she followed with, "And now AI capabilities are in the palm of our hands," the boos returned. "Okay. We've got a bipolar topic here I see," she said. "I love it, passion, let's go."

She made the case that tech disruptions like this have happened before, comparing it to past changes, especially the internet's arrival, which scared people at first but opened doors later. "AI is beginning to challenge all major sectors to find their highest and best use," she said. "Okay, I don't want any giggles when I say this. We have been through this before, these industrial revolutions. In my graduation era, we were faced with the launch of the internet."

She described a time when the long-term effects of emerging technologies were unclear, noting how early skepticism eventually gave way to widespread adoption and economic growth. She said that at the time, people didn't yet understand how those emerging technologies would reshape everyday life, and that many of the same uncertainties and concerns exist today. Looking back, she said, they boosted the economy, birthed companies like Apple, Google, and Meta, and created many jobs.

Caulfield put AI in that same hopeful light: paired with human smarts, it could tackle big global issues, and these grads might help make it happen.

At Tavistock, she handles partnerships for Lake Nona, Florida's planned community focused on health and tech. Earlier in her speech, she referenced Jeff Bezos as an example of long-term technological ambition, describing Amazon as a "stepping stone" toward his broader interest in space.

The audience reaction points to real worries about AI's quick hit on humanities and media jobs. Recent data shows AI isn't just assisting workers – it's replacing them. A report cited by CBS found that 21,490 job cuts in a single month were attributed to AI, accounting for 26% of all layoffs and marking the second consecutive month the technology was the leading cause.

Tech CEOs aren't mincing words about this. Palantir CEO Alex Karp said in April that AI will "destroy" humanities jobs. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has warned that the technology could eliminate a significant portion of entry-level white-collar roles. Even companies often held up as examples of earlier tech revolutions are restructuring around AI. Meta, for example, recently announced plans to cut 10% of its workforce as it increases its focus on AI systems.

The effects are also showing up in academic and cultural work as AI tools alter how research, translation, and archival work are done. A Microsoft study identified historians, interpreters, and translators among the professions most exposed to disruption from AI.

All this explains why Caulfield's comparison to past technological revolutions did not land smoothly with the audience in front of her. She saw AI's upside down the road; the crowd was thinking about jobs now.

UCF did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Permalink to story:

 
It used to take months and many skilled laborers to build a house. Then DeWalt's radial arm saw came along. Got rid of a lot of guys

"This saw, originally called the "Wonder-Worker," revolutionized woodworking by allowing multiple cutting operations without changing setups."

Oh and people prefer booing to thinking. Even graduates
 
If artificial neural networks, "AI" in modern parlance, were not forced onto the public by the rich and mighty with out-of-touch glee, people would not have such strong reactions. Couple this to the job losses, and small wonder, the pitchforks are coming out. It highlights a divide between the Common Folk and the High.

As a lover of science fiction, I am not averse to the day when sentience is cracked by engineering and we see the likes of KITT, Bishop, or VEGA. (Indeed, at that point, it becomes a moral/ethical matter.) But, as a human out of work thanks to AI, I understand and share people's worries regarding livelihood. It must be noted that the powers, whether they realise it or not, want free labour/automated slavery. Luckily, the laws of physics say that work comes at a cost, and I will certainly chuckle when it blows up in their faces.
 
- Do you really need to preach to students about the AI that will replace them?
- What are you gonna do? Pretend it's Not the next industrial revolution and you don't have to think about it to make your career choices?

So yeah she's gotta talk about that. Just try to be a little less tone deaf.
 
It used to take months and many skilled laborers to build a house. Then DeWalt's radial arm saw came along. Got rid of a lot of guys

"This saw, originally called the "Wonder-Worker," revolutionized woodworking by allowing multiple cutting operations without changing setups."
This is a straw-man argument and is meaningless in the context.

While AI is "good" at some things, it is not good at everything and it will take a long time before it is.
Oh and people prefer booing to thinking. Even graduates
Anyone is capable of verifying what I have said. In fact, if anyone has paid attention to AI news here at TS, what I said is easily verifiable.

AI, itself, is not intelligent, even though it will tell you it does, it doesn't think. Its not sentient, and perhaps never will be.

Anyone spouting blather like this woman, has bought the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow; either that, or the Brooklyn Bridge. When she returns to Earth and gets her head out of the pie-in-the-sky idea of not having to work and sitting around doing nothing as a profession, she just might gain some wisdom and credibility.

In the meantime, the AI "Gods" have done their marketing well and roped yet another unwitting dolt willing to parrot their blather.

Polly want a cracker?
 
What nonsense - they were conditioned to hate AI and let the presenter know… she still finished her speech and I’m sure most tuned it out (no one listens to graduation speeches).

As for “AI will replace you”… they’re just graduating university!! Most don’t actually have jobs yet! Not to mention that they SHOULD have been educated to work WITH AI - and so should be among the people not being replaced…
 
What nonsense - they were conditioned to hate AI and let the presenter know… she still finished her speech and I’m sure most tuned it out (no one listens to graduation speeches).

As for “AI will replace you”… they’re just graduating university!! Most don’t actually have jobs yet! Not to mention that they SHOULD have been educated to work WITH AI - and so should be among the people not being replaced…
Baseless accusations, no facts found in your wall of text.
 
Do the luddites hate AI because it could take their job or because it sucks? It can’t really be both.

If something is repeatedly forced onto people, they will grow to hate it. Take chocolate, which most enjoy. If America's tech corporations kept on forcing us to eat chocolate, as they are doing with AI, it will not be long before we grow to detest it.
 
The AI hate is unreal. What's wrong with people? This is not rational, this is pure panic and fear and brainwashing. AI, if you forget for a ****ing second the evil corporation and get over this ****, is the achievement of humankind. We are creating intelligence and we should be hyped about this. What sci-fi authors wrote about—robots, AI—we are finally beginning to achieve it.

Hating on AI, for me, is like hating on the first computer. It's insane, clinically insane to me.
 
If something is repeatedly forced onto people, they will grow to hate it. Take chocolate, which most enjoy. If America's tech corporations kept on forcing us to eat chocolate, as they are doing with AI, it will not be long before we grow to detest it.
At first… but then they grow to accept it… as they will with AI. The same thing happens with every technological advance. People said the same about electricity.
Do the luddites hate AI because it could take their job or because it sucks? It can’t really be both.
It can actually… people are contradictory by nature…. But in this case, it’s actually more than that. They hate what they don’t understand, but at the same time desire what it can give them.

There’s a reason so many products advertise themselves as having AI or AI capabilities- people actually buy that stuff!
 
What nonsense - they were conditioned to hate AI and let the presenter know… she still finished her speech and I’m sure most tuned it out (no one listens to graduation speeches).

As for “AI will replace you”… they’re just graduating university!! Most don’t actually have jobs yet! Not to mention that they SHOULD have been educated to work WITH AI - and so should be among the people not being replaced…
These are just baseless accusations unless you have proof they were "conditioned" to hate AI.

And the speech is incredibly tone deaf to be preaching AI at arts students, the thing that is literally replacing artists and stealing real artwork to produce AI slop.
 
At first… but then they grow to accept it… as they will with AI. The same thing happens with every technological advance. People said the same about electricity.
Yes, there are literally old images and caricatures of how electricity was seen. It's the same old, same old. Fear of new stuff. I'm so tired of it.

139c409f321ca075cc52c5eb7dfa57a2d78a7628.jpeg
 
The AI hate is unreal. What's wrong with people? This is not rational, this is pure panic and fear and brainwashing. AI, if you forget for a ****ing second the evil corporation and get over this ****, is the achievement of humankind. We are creating intelligence and we should be hyped about this. What sci-fi authors wrote about—robots, AI—we are finally beginning to achieve it.

Hating on AI, for me, is like hating on the first computer. It's insane, clinically insane to me.
The AI hate is justified, when everyone and everything is constantly shoving AI in our faces, of course people will get tired of hearing the AI shills saying it'll the replace people and be the best thing ever.
But what's insane is thinking millions of GPUs running LLM scripts can ever be "intelligent". The AI brainwashing has gotten incredibly tiring, there is nothing smart about GPUs doing predictive guesses, and it's a massive waste of resources.
 
These are just baseless accusations unless you have proof they were "conditioned" to hate AI.
You are my proof - along with everyone who posts ignorant stuff like you.
And the speech is incredibly tone deaf to be preaching AI at arts students, the thing that is literally replacing artists and stealing real artwork to produce AI slop.
AI will be replacing people along all sectors - and new sectors will arise that will still need humanity. Much like the mechanization of farming, AI IS a good thing - but, with all change comes temporary suffering. Those who can’t or won’t adapt suffer the most - but within a generation or two, life goes on.

It behooves the young to understand this - especially university graduates.
 
At first… but then they grow to accept it… as they will with AI. The same thing happens with every technological advance. People said the same about electricity.

The problem is, partly, Big Tech's approach. If they had kept it more low-key, while the technology got better, it wouldn't have stirred such ire. Though of course, once jobs were under the guillotine, it would be a different story.

There is a two-fold difference with AI, in the strict sci-fi sense rather than today's LLMs. Whereas previous invention replaced bodily labour or repetitive mental effort, AI replicates intelligence—the thing man prides himself upon. This clashes with millennia of human exceptionalism. In a way, debunks it. Secondly, AI creates another "tribe," leading to human-AI conflict: the AI minority being attacked, marginalised, and even denied sentience (if indeed sentient). Fear of the unknown, the other, would drive such sentiment.

For my part, I don't share these sentiments, as I touched on in my original comment. By the same token, I understand the concerns of people losing their jobs today. Nobody deserves, or wants, to be treated like an out-of-date computer.
 
Last edited:
The problem is, partly, Big Tech's approach. If they had kept it more low-key, while the technology got better, it wouldn't have stirred such ire. Though of course, once jobs were under the guillotine, it would be a different story.

There is a two-fold difference with AI, in the strict sci-fi sense rather than today's LLMs. Whereas previous invention replaced bodily labour or repetitive mental effort, AI replicates intelligence—the thing man prides himself upon. This clashes with millennia of human exceptionalism. In a way, debunks it. Secondly, AI creates another "tribe," leading to human-AI conflict: the AI minority being attacked, marginalised, and even denied sentience (if indeed sentient). Fear of the unknown, the other, would drive such sentiment.

For my part, I don't share these sentiments, as I touched on in my original comment. By the same token, I understand the concerns of people losing their jobs today. Nobody deserves, or wants, to be treated like an out-of-date computer.
Keeping AI low-key would have been impossible. It’s what mankind has been striving for for decades - and in a capitalist world, being first and “loudest” means profit.

While what we currently have isn’t “true AI”, it’s still far more capable at certain things than most humans are.

It does suck when you become obsolete - whether because of new technology, age, health or any other reason… but alas, it’s the price we pay for progress.
 
Do the luddites hate AI because it could take their job or because it sucks? It can’t really be both.
It is both, which is what plenty of companies are doing because it's cheaper than paying real people a livable wage for quality artwork.
Yes, there are literally old images and caricatures of how electricity was seen. It's the same old, same old. Fear of new stuff. I'm so tired of it.

139c409f321ca075cc52c5eb7dfa57a2d78a7628.jpeg
The strawman arguments are equally tiring.
AI isn't a fear of the new thing, it's the justified concern for massive job losses, causing an economic collapse, on top of tech billionaires telling the average folks it'll make everything better, cheaper, and and easier while in reality it's doing the opposite for anyone but the tech elite. The apparent hate, or in reality the valid dislike because tech corporations won't shut up about AI while it only has a few good uses until someone can actually create an AI that is more than an Artificial Stupidity.
 
Keeping AI low-key would have been impossible. It’s what mankind has been striving for for decades - and in a capitalist world, being first and “loudest” means profit.

While what we currently have isn’t “true AI”, it’s still far more capable at certain things than most humans are.

It does suck when you become obsolete - whether because of new technology, age, health or any other reason… but alas, it’s the price we pay for progress.

Profit drives all, certainly.

I've got a feeling it's not going to lead to the progress we would like in an idealistic world. It may lead to more inequality, a veritable Elysium. These people are after free labour, and if "true AI" is reached, there will be gross moral abuses taking place.
 
Back