WD unveils new high-capacity 32TB SMR and 26TB CMR disk drives

Daniel Sims

Posts: 2,469   +74
Staff
The big picture: Although consumers have largely transitioned to fast and durable solid-state drives, data centers and other sectors requiring mass storage still rely on disk drives. Competitors Western Digital and Seagate have spent years pushing the limits of HDD storage, developing various technologies to edge past the 30TB mark while reducing costs and power consumption.

Western Digital recently announced new data center HDDs that increase Shingled Magnetic Recording (SMR) capacity to 32TB and Conventional Magnetic Recording (CMR) capacity to 26TB. The company achieved these unprecedented capacities by squeezing an 11th platter to the industry-standard HDD form factor, making the new products compatible with existing infrastructure.

The 32TB Ultrastar DC HC690 represents the next step in Western Digital's implementation of Ultra Shingled Magnetic Recording (UltraSMR) technology, which arranges data tracks in overlapping layers. Meanwhile, the 26TB HD590 offers a more cost-effective solution for clients who prefer the mature CMR technology.

Both products also use Energy-Assisted Perpendicular Magnetic Recording (ePMR), which employs additional electric currents to increase the areal density of bits written to the disk. However, the primary boost in capacity came from the addition of the extra platter.

Traditionally, hard drives contain up to 10 platters within the industry-standard dimensions. While adding more platters is a straightforward way to increase capacity, it can limit adoption by requiring clients to adapt to new, larger form factors.

As a result, companies like Western Digital and Seagate have focused much of their innovation on increasing the data stored per platter. This is the main purpose of ePMR, but Seagate recently introduced 32TB HDDs using Heat-Assisted Magnetic Recording (HAMR). Seagate has spent years developing HAMR, which temporarily heats tiny sections of the disk to increase data density without disrupting magnetic stability.

In contrast, WD achieved its 11-platter design for both SMR and CMR drives by reducing the space between platters and optimizing the surrounding mechanical components. The company made improvements to the suspension system, circuit board, disk stack, and read/write head to accommodate the extra platter.

These changes increased storage capacity while maintaining compatibility with existing server racks, all without increasing power consumption. Western Digital aims to eventually reach 50TB capacity through similar methods in the future.

Meanwhile, both Seagate and Western Digital are pushing other recording technologies to steadily increase capacity over the next several years. Industry forecasts suggest that 60TB HDDs could arrive by 2028. Seagate is targeting 100TB by 2030, though analysts believe this milestone may not be achievable before 2037.

Permalink to story:

 
We need a new tech to replace hard drives. Something as reliable as archive tapes, but as fast as HDDs.
Maybe, NAND will become so cheap and spacious that it will do it.
But today, it does not like it can anytime soon.
Seriously, hard drives for home storage
should be banned unless used in raid.
I would much rather keep vital files
on SSD than HDD today. Hard drives were never
the same after that one year when every warranty went from 5 years to 1.
 
I would much rather keep vital files
on SSD than HDD today. Hard drives were never
the same after that one year when every warranty went from 5 years to 1.

Opposite experience to me. There’s been some bad drives for both types, but I’ve had more failures/degradation in SSDs so far.
 
We need a new tech to replace hard drives. Something as reliable as archive tapes, but as fast as HDDs.
Maybe, NAND will become so cheap and spacious that it will do it.
But today, it does not like it can anytime soon.
Seriously, hard drives for home storage
should be banned unless used in raid.
I would much rather keep vital files
on SSD than HDD today. Hard drives were never
the same after that one year when every warranty went from 5 years to 1.

I've never seen any of my HDDS fail, one of them is over a decade old.
 
We're getting to a point where the write and read speeds of HDDs are stagnant, have been for about a decade, and that posses it's own risk. It takes over a day to populate or read all the information off of a 30TB HDD.
 
I've never seen any of my HDDS fail, one of them is over a decade old.
Funny, I lost more than 10 HHDS over the last 10 years. It's pretty sad... even newer disks with only 1 year and something. It just sucks. Now im only buying the WD ultrastar versions. Seem fast, cool and silent. Huge warranty too. We will see how things workout.

P.s. I lost USB 3.0 HDDs from many companies, they just stop working within 2-3 years. I lost regular HHDs too. Many. WD blacks, WD, blues, WD Reds. Few Seagates. All in all, I spend too much money for this tech, to replace broken drives. Money I can never get back. If they never fail and work so good... id be the first person in the world to praise them. I have yet to lose even 1 SSD. How many I got ? 15 right now. A few 4TB ones, a few 2TB ones and many 1TB/500GB ones. The only issue I got with them is the health level of one oldest (250gigs) one is around 50%. A drive from 2015. Im glad people have positive experience with HDDs, I love the tech... but sadly I do not. I honestly love it. Cheap, huge space and actually VERY FAST. The new drives can be as fast as SATA 3 SSDs. At least for moving big files. 300MB is no joke. 500mb cache. It allows me to transfer files instantly. Even big files of the size of 10GB take 2-3 seconds. Its magic. Again for the last time, love the tech...but the tech keeps dying on me.
 
Back