AMD now ships more than 30% of x86 PC CPUs as Intel's long-held lead keeps shrinking

midian182

Posts: 11,843   +179
Staff member
What just happened? AMD has crossed another milestone in its CPU war with Intel. For the first time ever, Mercury Research has Team Red passing a 30% share of the x86 client CPU market, which covers processors for both desktops and laptops.

Mercury Research revealed in a research note yesterday that AMD's share of x86 client CPU shipments reached 30.3% in Q2, while Intel was at 69.7%.

The result represents a 0.7% increase from the 29.6% AMD recorded in the first quarter. Compared with Q2 2025, when Lisa Su's company held 23.9%, its share has jumped 6.4% in a year. The latest gains came from increases across both desktop and mobile processors.

These figures measure unit shipments into the supply chain, not the number of Intel and AMD systems currently in use. They're also separate from revenue share: AMD had already passed the 30% threshold in that category, reaching 31.4% of client CPU revenue in Q1.

The milestone arrived during an unexpectedly strong quarter for processor shipments. In the research note shared by Tae Kim, Mercury wrote: "Actual results for both X86 and ARM CPUs were up strongly, with sequential quarterly growth of the total market exceeding 10 percent." The firm said this was far above normal seasonal trends, which typically call for a slight quarterly decline.

A separate Jon Peddie Research report put quarterly client CPU growth at 9.4%, although shipments were down 1.1% year-over-year. It noted that Q2 is normally a weaker period as PC makers and retailers clear old inventory.

"Client CPU units and revenue looked solid in the quarter, though some of that reflects OEM inventory rebuilding rather than pure demand strength," JPR wrote. "Worth remembering: Q1 was a rough supply quarter for Intel, and OEM inventories dropped then, so this quarter's build mostly just restores normal levels."

The memory crisis is still having an effect, of course. Rising DRAM and SSD prices have made new PCs and upgrades more expensive, particularly in the DIY market. JPR said many enthusiasts brought purchases forward into Q4 2025 ahead of expected increases, leaving second-quarter retail demand weak even as manufacturers rebuilt depleted inventories.

AMD's own results support reports of rising Ryzen demand. Its client business generated $3.1 billion during Q2, up 23% year-over-year. CEO Su said Ryzen Pro sales grew more than 50% from a year earlier as the company secured new enterprise customers.

"Our first half performance has been very strong and although we are expecting that the market will decline in the second half, it has actually held up better than most people would have thought," Su said.

There is one important caveat. The 30.3% figure only covers the AMD-Intel x86 split and excludes Arm processors, including Apple Silicon and Qualcomm's Snapdragon chips. Mercury estimated that Arm held 14.4% of the broader PC client market in Q1, so AMD has not captured 30% of all PC processor shipments.

Permalink to story:

 
Hoping one day this success would bleed over to the their gpu consumer business any decade now. 😅
If they do, it's due to NVIDIA abandoning gamers entirely. Then Intel and AMD can duke it out in that market as well.

In the GPU market it doesn't feel like AMD has even been trying. Performance wise the crown has been solidly in NVIDIA's hands for what, over a decade now?
Price to performance wise they're not exactly putting their best foot forward either only undercutting NVIDIA by a little bit. Not to mention it's always with caveats when it comes to features so you can't give blanket advice of 'everyone should get this'.
 
In the GPU market it doesn't feel like AMD has even been trying. Performance wise the crown has been solidly in NVIDIA's hands for what, over a decade now?
Price to performance wise they're not exactly putting their best foot forward either only undercutting NVIDIA by a little bit. Not to mention it's always with caveats when it comes to features so you can't give blanket advice of 'everyone should get this'.

AMD undercut the 5070 Ti at MSRP by a reasonable amount but now it's:

9070 XT: $720
5070 Ti: $1050

$330 isn't a "little bit" for most people.

9070: $630
5070: $800

Neither is $170.

9060 XT 16GB: $460
5060 Ti 16GB: $730

Nor is $270.

9060 XT 8GB: $370
5060: $450

Well this is a bit closer at least, only $80.
 
AMD undercut the 5070 Ti at MSRP by a reasonable amount but now it's:
-- snip --
I meant more the launch prices / actual prices close to launch.
They're either not aggressive with the price when they can be, or vice versa try to be aggressive with prices but then their partners go "Hold on, I need to make a buck - we're not doing that long term".

What the prices end up being the price to performance after a while - it's definitely better on the AMD side.
I refuse to call them good, because for years now you're just picking between how hard you're getting effed over.
The 6700 XT when it hit the right price point is about the only card that hit a 'good' price to performance ratio. It was good enough for me to reluctantly buy one because I didn't expect things to get better any soon (and they haven't).
 
This could turn around fast if Intel makes a triumphant comeback, as they'll have their fabs and TSMC pumping out chips in larger quantities than AMD could. Or Intel fumbles again and AMD rules the x86 world.

Crazy how it's only 30% when you factor in how Zen was the Intel killer since inception and Intel was on its last legs.

Fast forward and after removing HTT, the degradation of 13 AND 14th gen, and AM4 and X3D being the talk of the town since then - AMD managed a whole 30%.

This is why the AMD fanboys and Intel haters are so insufferable. They're tech wannabes.
 
Last edited:
I guess AMD keeping AM4 around for so long is paying dividends on the back end as people update their AM4 systems to 5-series x3D chips for far less than a core system upgrade to AM5.

As far as GPU is concerned I've had my 9070xt that I snagged about 8 months ago and I am damn happy with it.

Solid card (thermals/power/drivers etc), solid performance @ 1440p, FSR 4.1 and frame gen work well and at $600 it was absolutely a steal in the current market despite that price being the most I have ever paid for a GPU ever.

My spidey sense told me to buy or it would be another 3-4 years of waiting before something "reasonable" came along again.
 
Back