A year after Zen 5's debut, we revisit AMD's Ryzen 9800X3D vs 7800X3D to see if the premium is worth it. With new GPUs and updates, has performance shifted or is the older chip still the smarter buy?
A year after Zen 5's debut, we revisit AMD's Ryzen 9800X3D vs 7800X3D to see if the premium is worth it. With new GPUs and updates, has performance shifted or is the older chip still the smarter buy?
With the 7800X3D currently available at near-record-low prices
Ok....and it is now available for $360, which is only $19 over its all time low, hence "NEAR record low prices". He didnt say it was record low right now, its NEAR the record low.LOLNO, Steve, please. Record low it was just before 9800X3D and Failure Lake. Screenshot from one of my local price aggregators, chart is local average prices converted to USD:
![]()
Props to all who recognize aggregator
Please learn how CPU and GPU benchmarks work. This is not an article on "what makes sense in a mid range build".Now correct the title: Which should you buy if you own an Nvidia 5090? Do the same test with anything lower like an RTX 5070Ti or Radeon 9070XT and Ryzen 7600 is enough.
Yes, that would be great!Why can’t they fix cpu naming conventions so it’s obvious which is newer / better? Both AMD and Intel naming is stupid.
Ok....and it is now available for $360, which is only $19 over its all time low, hence "NEAR record low prices". He didnt say it was record low right now, its NEAR the record low.
If you're going to criticise the writer at least try to understand the argument first......
Please learn how CPU and GPU benchmarks work. This is not an article on "what makes sense in a mid range build".
It's such a simple subject yet so many go slack jawed and drool over their keyboard "duh, what about other GPUs huuuhhhh?" when asked to engage their brain and consider why you would use a 5090 to remove bottlenecks in a CPU review.
Ok....and it is now available for $360, which is only $19 over its all time low, hence "NEAR record low prices". He didnt say it was record low right now, its NEAR the record low.
If you're going to criticise the writer at least try to understand the argument first......
Please learn how CPU and GPU benchmarks work. This is not an article on "what makes sense in a mid range build".
It's such a simple subject yet so many go slack jawed and drool over their keyboard "duh, what about other GPUs huuuhhhh?" when asked to engage their brain and consider why you would use a 5090 to remove bottlenecks in a CPU review.
Ok....and it is now available for $360, which is only $19 over its all time low, hence "NEAR record low prices". He didnt say it was record low right now, its NEAR the record low.
If you're going to criticise the writer at least try to understand the argument first......
Please learn how CPU and GPU benchmarks work. This is not an article on "what makes sense in a mid range build".
It's such a simple subject yet so many go slack jawed and drool over their keyboard "duh, what about other GPUs huuuhhhh?" when asked to engage their brain and consider why you would use a 5090 to remove bottlenecks in a CPU review.
Ok....and it is now available for $360, which is only $19 over its all time low, hence "NEAR record low prices". He didnt say it was record low right now, its NEAR the record low.
If you're going to criticise the writer at least try to understand the argument first......
Please learn how CPU and GPU benchmarks work. This is not an article on "what makes sense in a mid range build".
It's such a simple subject yet so many go slack jawed and drool over their keyboard "duh, what about other GPUs huuuhhhh?" when asked to engage their brain and consider why you would use a 5090 to remove bottlenecks in a CPU review.
Ok....and it is now available for $360, which is only $19 over its all time low, hence "NEAR record low prices". He didnt say it was record low right now, its NEAR the record low.
If you're going to criticise the writer at least try to understand the argument first......
Please learn how CPU and GPU benchmarks work. This is not an article on "what makes sense in a mid range build".
It's such a simple subject yet so many go slack jawed and drool over their keyboard "duh, what about other GPUs huuuhhhh?" when asked to engage their brain and consider why you would use a 5090 to remove bottlenecks in a CPU review.
Actually, the title is which you should by not which is theoretically faster when the GPU bottleneck is removed as much as possible.Ok....and it is now available for $360, which is only $19 over its all time low, hence "NEAR record low prices". He didnt say it was record low right now, its NEAR the record low.
If you're going to criticise the writer at least try to understand the argument first......
Please learn how CPU and GPU benchmarks work. This is not an article on "what makes sense in a mid range build".
It's such a simple subject yet so many go slack jawed and drool over their keyboard "duh, what about other GPUs huuuhhhh?" when asked to engage their brain and consider why you would use a 5090 to remove bottlenecks in a CPU review.
This. Most people don't understand. A buddy of mine runs a 9800x3D with an 4060TI. He wants to upgrade the GPU next year because of current budget constraints. He bought the system ( with B850 board and 32GB Sweetspot RAM) a couple of months ago. Before that he had a 13600k rig. I kept telling him to just buy a better GPU because the 13600k is perfectly capable for most tasks, but the review hype train is running in his mind - he dreamt of having 40% more FPS, but that stayed a dream. He basically has the same gaming experience as before (ie not looking at FPS counters, just gaming, K/D ratio is the same, Overall experience fells the same - Thats what he said to me). Dude needs to learn the hard way that reviews test CPUs with the 5090 for a reason.The difference will also be zero with anything below a 4090.
What about mixed use? I spend half my time gaming and the other half editing video and photos, often massive file sizes. Transcoding speed? Applying local AI effects, etc."