Deepfakes pioneer says "perfectly real" videos are six months away

midian182

Posts: 9,741   +121
Staff member
Forward-looking: Deepfake videos have become increasingly more convincing over the last year, but most people can still spot the tell-tale signs that a clip isn’t real. But according to a pioneer of the technology, images and videos that appear “perfectly real” will start appearing in the next six to twelve months.

Deepfakes is the manipulation of images and videos using machine learning, usually involving the superimposing of a person’s face over the source material. It was highlighted last year when the technique was used to digitally replace the faces of porn actresses with those of Hollywood stars, but since then we’ve seen how it can be used to put words into the mouths of public figures, potentially making the scourge of fake news much worse.

In an interview with CNBC, Hao Li, an associate professor of computer science at the University of Southern California, noted that in most cases, it’s easy to spot a Deepfakes video.

“It’s still very easy, you can tell from the naked eye most of the deepfakes,” he said, “but there also are examples that are really, really convincing.” Li added that these require “sufficient effort” to create.

“Soon, it's going to get to the point where there is no way that we can actually detect [deepfakes] anymore, so we have to look at other types of solutions.”

At the EmTech MIT conference last week, which was hosted by MIT Technology Review, Li showed off a deepfakes of Russian president Vladimir Putin. He said that "perfect and virtually undetectable" deepfakes were "a few years" away.

The Putin example wasn’t particularly convincing, but it was a live demo that pasted the president’s head onto Technology Review editor-in-chief Gideon Lichfield. We’ve seen other deepfakes that are more realistic, including the Obama video below, in which the former president is voiced by filmmaker Jordan Peele.

Last month saw deepfakes app Zao, which allows users to insert their faces into scenes from popular movies and TV shows, court controversy over its privacy implications. September also saw Facebook partner with Microsoft and several universities to improve deepfake detection, with the social network creating its own deepfakes and offering prizes for those who can detect them. Should Li’s predictions come to pass, better methods for identifying the videos will be needed.

Permalink to story.

 
The time is now for Congress to take action to outlaw the distribution of these simple programs to all but a few, very regulated, industries otherwise the entire idea of video evidence will be tainted forever .....
 
Not a lot of things scare me but this is just bad. We all know how childish Democrats are and how they want to impeach our president and bias news agencies and some politicians made up fake reports to make him look bad. Just imagine using this software to frame him.

What people don't realize is that if you ever want to be a politician or president you better make sure your history on Facebook doesn't come back to haunt you. I see blackmailing being a big thing.
 
Not a lot of things scare me but this is just bad. We all know how childish Democrats are and how they want to impeach our president and bias news agencies and some politicians made up fake reports to make him look bad. Just imagine using this software to frame him.

What people don't realize is that if you ever want to be a politician or president you better make sure your history on Facebook doesn't come back to haunt you. I see blackmailing being a big thing.

We have real video and audio of him doing and saying terrible things already, and it didn't matter. Trump is immune to deep fakes. Whether clip going forward is either real or fake, he'll either own it or call it fake, it'll be in the news cycle for a week, and that will be the grand total of the damage.
 
The time is now for Congress to take action to outlaw the distribution of these simple programs to all but a few, very regulated, industries otherwise the entire idea of video evidence will be tainted forever .....
Agree. Usually technology is a tool that can be used for good and bad purposes. But I see no legit good purpose behind deepfakes; even using it in the entertainment industry is a weak "good" purpose.
 
Not a lot of things scare me but this is just bad. We all know how childish Democrats are and how they want to impeach our president and bias news agencies and some politicians made up fake reports to make him look bad. Just imagine using this software to frame him.

Dude, you still do not understand your president. He's spent the past few years deconstructing the behavioral expectations of the leader of the free world on every media outlet possible from the far left to the far right. He's making sure that when deepfakes of him are eventually made, he's already covered those topics and nothing will be controversial. You gotta stay one step ahead of the opposition.
 
Yup another deal bringing back jobs to America. This just came out today. Apple pressured with tariffs and agrees with Trumps deal. Not an APPLE fan but this is great news.https://www.foxbusiness.com/technol...sngP4b4bCIGoJTvs-tu6touUbVaC16cjEaathEjcq5f5Y

You mean just like the previous Mac Pro, which was also made in the US. Apple made no change to their computer production plans and got concessions from the Trump administration. This is a great example of why they are such a profitable business.
 
I hope this spells the end for Hollywood and all of its elitist, left-wing, radical, above-the-law, over-paid actors & actresses trying to cram their “do-as-I-say, not-as-I-do” rhetoric down my throat. Perhaps the day will come when I can watch an episode of my favorite TV show and move all the sliders to the far-right under the “settings” menu.
 
Uncle Al said:
The time is now for Congress to take action to outlaw the distribution of these simple programs to all but a few, very regulated, industries otherwise the entire idea of video evidence will be tainted forever .....

@Ancle Al

Yeah, because outlawing things like guns, drugs, etc, that can be used for nefarious purposes has been soooo effective. So which industry do you advocate entrusting this technology to? The news media, the intelligence community, law enforcement? Certain news outlets are probably funding the development of said software. As a retired government employee, the last group I'd entrust this tech to is the govt/law enforcement followed by the media outlets.
 
You can fool some of the people some of the time but not all of the people all of the time. -Lincoln
 
The time is now for Congress to take action to outlaw the distribution of these simple programs to all but a few, very regulated, industries otherwise the entire idea of video evidence will be tainted forever .....
Deep Fake videos are less likely to be used in a crime than a congressperson.
 
I wanna deepfake video of Harvey Weinstein naming all the actresses he asked/forced to sex. Should we even call that "deepfake" since it's just a reconstruction of the actual events, required because the perp didn't confess. It's not really "fake"? Maybe just "deep" :)
 
Back