Nah, I just know how games are supported to actually run. While most Linux "gamers" thinks 60 fps is awesome. Many even thinks 30 fps is good enough. Hahahha.
Come again when you have seen 500 fps on 500 Hz OLED.
Linux is not fragmented? LMAO! Clueless. Biggest problem with Linux. Most people doing distro hopping and never learn to use Linux. I installed Arch from scratch before you even booted your first live usb and yet I don't use Linux for gaming.
Most of these socalled Linux gamers, don't even know how to troubleshoot and gets peak performance in Linux and just installed a beginner distro that "works" out of the box, installs Steam and pick one of the games that actually work, then come to the conclusion that Linux is good for gaming. Hahahha. Deluded.
Linux is overall (still) bad for gaming. Hence why you don't see any gamers build a top tier gaming system, then install Linux on it. Might as well shoot yourself in the foot while you are at it.
PC games are made for Windows, hence why ACTUAL REQUIREMENTS says Windows is needed. Linux/Proton emulation sacrifices performance in most cases and tons of games don't work at all still. On top of that, drivers are mostly crap for Linux, with no official ones for the actual high-end hardware.
Linux newbies using dated hardware, playing old single player games, acting Linux is good for gaming, makes me giggle.
In 9 out of 10 times, these people don't even know how to update the system, and/or drivers. And if they do, eventually they will break something doing it, and most will be clueless on how to fix it.
99% of PC games still run vastly better in Windows. Hence why people showcasing game performance in Linux always cherrypicks the same titles, that actually run decent (yet Windows wins in pretty much all cases, when looking at avg and 1% lows)
Linux for gaming is only good if Tux Racer is the goal (Windows version exist too, lets gooo Linux casuals!!!)
This Site cannot be reached