Microsoft faces heavy fines after EU investigation into unfair Teams bundles

In a nutshell: An EU investigation accuses Microsoft of breaching antitrust regulation by bundling Teams with its Office 365 and Microsoft 365 subscriptions. This move is deemed to have restricted competition from communication software rivals like Slack and given Microsoft an unfair market advantage. If found guilty, the company could face heavy fines.

European Union regulators have accused tech giant Microsoft of breaching their antitrust laws by tying Microsoft Teams to its Office 365 and Microsoft 365 subscription services, after a lengthy investigation into the company's practices.

In a Statement of Objections released today, the European Commission stated that their objections to Microsoft's practices revolve around the company gaining an unfair distribution advantage by not allowing consumers to choose whether or not to adopt the communication service. "The Commission is concerned that Microsoft may have granted Teams a distribution advantage by not giving customers the choice whether or not to acquire access to Teams when they subscribe to their SaaS productivity applications," the statement reads.

EU on a roll – also see: European Commission finds Apple violated the DMA, threatens huge $38 billion fine

"This advantage may have been further exacerbated by interoperability limitations between Teams' competitors and Microsoft's offerings. The conduct may have prevented Teams' rivals from competing, and in turn innovating, to the detriment of customers in the European Economic Area."

The Commission says that if proved true, these practices would infringe upon Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which aims to prevent the abuse of a dominant market position by an entity. The EU Commission began their investigation into this issue on July 27, 2023, after a complaint was filed by rival Slack Technologies, Inc. A subsequent complaint was also filed by German video conferencing company Alfaview, who had similar grievances.

Microsoft unbundled Teams from some of its SaaS packages in an attempt to rectify these complaints in July 2023, but the Commission says that the changes have not been sufficient enough to "restore competition." The competition in this case being other communication services like claimants Slack and Alfaview. Since Windows and the Office suite are dominant across the globe, it means that many private and commercial consumers adopt Teams as their de facto communication application since it comes bundled with those software packages. This, in turn, can restrict competition.

"Preserving competition for remote communication and collaboration tools is essential, as it also fosters innovation on these markets," says Margrethe Vestager, the VP in charge of competition policy. "If confirmed, Microsoft's conduct would be illegal under our competition rules. Microsoft now has the opportunity to reply to our concerns."

Microsoft president Brad Smith has already issued a statement to the Financial Times, saying "having unbundled Teams and taken initial interoperability steps, we appreciate the additional clarity provided today and will work to find solutions to address the Commission's remaining concerns."

The company faces heavy fines of up to 10% of its worldwide annual turnover if it is found to have breached Article 102, and the EU Commission may also go on to impose other "remedies" they deem "proportionate" to end the infringement. Microsoft still has a right to defend itself against the allegations.

This isn't the first time Microsoft faces these kind of antitrust allegations. Last year, the company faced heavy pressure from the US FTC and its UK equivalent when it tried to acquire gaming giant Activision Blizzard because of its market dominance – Microsoft ultimately did acquire the gaming publisher, however.

Permalink to story:

 
How outrageous, a communication software is part of Office, and developped by Microsoft ? It's only in 1993 that the Microsoft at Work system (The idea of at Work was to design a standard set of communications protocol fax machines, photocopiers, telephones, printers, and hand-held PDAs (personal digital assistants) so it is very recent. Then came a long line of products supporting dozens of technologies, NetMeeting, from POTS, PBX compatibility and management, to ISDN then VoIP with SIP or evil proprietary software. like or years later something called "MSN Messenger", also Fax, SMS and part of a domain later called Unified Communication with VoIP, a mini-bubble, started almost yesterday 20-15 years ago, and disapeared almost as fast as it arrived.. thanks to Smartphones, using Windows Mobile or Symbian for instance, and apps like Office Communicator, Office Lync, Skype for Business, and Teams. So indeed Teams, and it's arrogant way of still supporting ISDN has taken everyone off guard. And it's sadening to see how they had a monopoly on communication, annd messaging apps. Or how, like the restt of Office it is not at all extensible with whatever you want, even less when those are technologies SIP or old PSTN, email, or maybe sms, ... Today, it's almost impossible to tell the difference between Teams and Slack. Teams can handle 1000 people able to stream video+voice in a meeting, and up to 100 000 for live events, by defaulty 20 000. And it seems it's WIP, more with Viva or Stream.
Slack (bought for $28B, Mr Salesforce wanted to get a few dollars with a settlement, I guess, it's like buying Netscape for $10B and years later noticing that it was not a good call or that the acquisition did work, and whining about mean Microsoft), Google Meet/Workspace/+/Hangouts/Duo/Assistant, Zoom (why the success ?), Cisco, Facebook, it's concerning to see such a closed application..

Maybe it's time to focus on Apple and 40 years of unfair business practices, and for 25 years, a parasite in the economy they invest in buybacks, don't contribbute or almost to all the open source they use, and are not making any positive impact anywhere, and Google for a tripple monopoly for more than 25 years... no with submilliseconds ads auctioning, Joe the Plumber (and GNU dev) cannot buy those ads unless he pays thousands a month...
 
Back