ROM site owner owes Nintendo $2.15 million after representing himself in piracy lawsuit

midian182

Posts: 7,056   +62
Staff member
What just happened? If you hold grand fantasies about representing yourself in court against a monolithic corporation, here's a cautionary tale. RomUniverse owner and operator Matthew Storman tried to do just that in a copyright infringement lawsuit brought by Nintendo—and it did not go well. He must now pay the company $2.15 million.

It was back in 2019 when Nintendo filed a lawsuit against RomUniverse. The Japanese gaming giant was seeking millions of dollars for copyright and trademark infringement from a site that was reportedly offering memberships for $30 per year, which allowed users to download an unlimited number of ROMs with higher speeds than non-members.

TorrentFreak reports that Nintendo won the case this week, probably helped by Storman's decision to defend himself. He had tried to invoke the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's (DMCA) "safe harbor" protections, claiming he was merely a service provider for users sharing files and that RomUniverse did not offer pirated games. Storman also said he never uploaded any ROMs himself.

Undermining Storman's argument was the fact that he'd already admitted in a sworn deposition testimony to uploading the ROM files to his site. He'd also tried to use the "first sale doctrine" defense, but that failed as the site was distributing copies of Nintendo's games and not Storman's personal property.

Storman had also previously testified that his site made between $30,000 and 36,000 dollars in 2019 and that it was making around $800 per month before it closed in 2020.

Not too surprisingly, the judge in the case sided with Nintendo. The company provided sufficient evidence to prove Storman is liable for various copyright and trademark infringements. His one bit of good news is that the judge decided the $15 million demanded by Nintendo was too high, awarding it $2.1 million instead. The judge also ruled against a permanent injunction as the site had already been shut down. But for Storman, whose "only source of income at the time of his deposition was unemployment and food stamps," it's still not the best outcome.

Nintendo has long been passionate about defending its IPs. Its most recent case involves Nintendo of America and its president, Bowser—who has the same name as the iconic King of the Koopas—suing a hacker called Bowser.

Permalink to story.

 

Squid Surprise

Posts: 4,126   +3,314
Well, it's not like this guy had a leg to stand on... it was clearly not legal for him to be distributing (let alone selling) Nintendo games...

Whether the damages should be 15 mill, 2 mill, or anything else is kind of irrelevant - he won't be able to pay anyways....
 

BadThad

Posts: 611   +649
Just a little guy, feel sorry for him in some ways. However, he rolled the dice and lost. Setting up websites for the distribution of "free" games, movies, music, etc. is risky business.
 

merikafyeah

Posts: 171   +121
The way the world works is: "A download does NOT equal a lost sale."

When everyone opens their eyes to reality, inflated "damages" have no basis and therefore go *poof*.
 

hwertz

Posts: 62   +25
The way the world works is: "A download does NOT equal a lost sale."

When everyone opens their eyes to reality, inflated "damages" have no basis and therefore go *poof*.
True -- but it does not sound like the site owner presented this line of argument during the case; if neither side brought it up, the judge doesn't have to consider it.

Gotta admit I'd be tempted to present my own defense too but I know it'd be a terrible idea, even if you think you have good ideas for a defense bounce them off the lawyer and they can tell you if they're really good ideas or not, and present them to the court better than you'd likely be able to yourself.