After being very happy with Seagate HDDs for many years, I bought a WD. I am not sure if it was a RED or not, but it was one of their "color" drives like the RED. It ran so hot that I figure I could have fried eggs on it. IIRC, it failed and WD replaced it with a slightly larger drive. I did not want to wait for the replacement, so I went back to an equivalent Seagate, and dumped the replacement WD on e-bay. The Seagate runs substantially cooler and I have had no problems with it. Never again WD.I work at a hardware store at service and seen a lot of these WD red fail so.... as for the rest +1
I use Synology DiskStation DS218 at home, to watch movies from it.
Unfortunately, most of 4K content fails to playback properly, the system isn't fast enough for it.
This is something I would advise potential buyers to consider.
Not worth it at the moment. Unless you are doing direct rendering on the the NAS. You'd benefit more getting HDDs and running a good network backbone at your place.Anone using all SSDs in a NAS? Thoughts?
you have to have the network built for it, 10g nics would do you wonders
Thanks!Not worth it at the moment. Unless you are doing direct rendering on the the NAS. You'd benefit more getting HDDs and running a good network backbone at your place.
I've been running 2 WD Black 750MB drives in a RAID1 for the past 10 years in a PC that's been running 24/7 all that time. I almost never shut her down, just occasional reboots, and her once a year tear down for a good cleaning inside. It's one of my main work PC's, so it gets driven hard for code development, graphics design, web surfing, software testing, and all the other usual stuff. Damn good drives that have never hiccup'd although they've been through Windows 7, 8, and 10.SSDs are still too expensive for me. I just bought a WD Black 2 TB hard drive for $114. When an SSD can match this, I'll switch to them. Until then my mechanical hard drives are still going strong. I do have one 120 GB SSD for my OS, that's it. Anyone remember the claims that SSDs would soon be in the price range of mechanical drives? Yeah right, quite a few years later and claims are still BS. The makers of the SSD don't want to let go of their profit margins. You know good and damn well an SSD has got to be cheaper to produce than a mechanical hard drive, yet prices are still out a sight. BS I say.