Windows Insiders can now pause updates indefinitely, in 35-day increments

Daniel Sims

Posts: 2,452   +74
Staff
In a nutshell: Forcing users to download Windows updates has long been one of Microsoft's most controversial policies. While keeping an operating system up to date is one of the most important security practices, users often find their devices updating at inconvenient times. A recent beta update aims to address this issue.

A new Windows update, currently rolling out to Dev Channel and Experimental Channel Insiders, overhauls how users manage system updates. Windows Update now allows indefinite postponements, the option to skip updates during initial setup, and the ability to reboot without immediately installing updates.

Previously, Windows users could delay updates by a few days or pause them for up to five weeks using a dropdown menu. The new system introduces a calendar interface that allows updates to be paused for up to 35 days at a time. Once that period ends, users can defer the update for another 35 days repeatedly, with no strict limit. Although Microsoft still intends for updates to be installed eventually, users now have more control over when they apply them and can wait until they are ready.

Additionally, updates can now be skipped during the out-of-the-box experience, allowing users to reach the desktop as quickly as possible when setting up a new device. To reduce disruptions, driver, .NET, and firmware updates will be bundled with monthly quality updates, meaning users who install updates promptly may only need to reboot once per month.

Furthermore, restarting or shutting down after installing updates will no longer automatically trigger their installation. When selecting the power button in the Start menu, users will now see two new options to shut down or restart normally, alongside options that apply pending updates. Windows will also attempt to restore closed apps more quickly after a standard reboot.

Recent Windows updates have been particularly problematic for Microsoft and its users. After a January update prevented some systems from rebooting properly, the company issued an out-of-band hotfix that itself required an emergency patch due to issues affecting certain applications. Meanwhile, a separate bug forced some users into recovery loops. Last month, Microsoft also paused the rollout of another update after it was installed incorrectly on a number of systems.

In another move likely to frustrate users, Windows 11 will also force-upgrade eligible devices to version 25H2 later this year. Microsoft is reportedly using machine learning models to determine which 24H2 systems are "ready," and when they will receive the mandatory update.

In another move likely to frustrate users, Windows 11 will also force-upgrade eligible devices to version 25H2 later this year. Microsoft is reportedly using machine learning models to determine which 24H2 systems are "ready," and when they will receive the mandatory update.

Permalink to story:

 
Good luck force updating Windows 10 Enterprise IoT LTSC, which is supported until 2032.
The problem with this is that 2032 will be here eventually and you're more than likely to have a hardware fault where MS won't transfer that license. So unless you have a pile of keys sitting around you might want to just start learning Linux or buy a Mac.
 
Last edited:
Yes. Been using WUB since 2020. No single update comes through if I don't want to.

Microsoft has become (or has always been?) one of the most untrustworthy organizations ever, so I'll keep blocking updates via third-party solutions designed to do just so.
According to an analysis by Ars in 2018, the problem comes from Microsoft using their old process of "design, program, integrate, fix," rather than making sure only bulletproof code enters the codebase through rigorous automated testing. The shorter time frames since 10 simply made the problem worse and more visible; and the QA department being fired or reassigned didn't help. Now, with generated code in the picture, the pace of failure seems to have picked up.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/201...shipping-windows-updates-its-developing-them/
 
No clue what these people are on, seperate options for restarting vs update and restart/shutdown have been a think for a long time now and you can install windows without the internet to avoid those disasterous updates during the oobe.

I've no idea why Microsoft is even granted a news article for implementing stuff that's already there or is available through a workaround. You don't even need a workaround for offline installs if you unplug your internet and install an edu or enterprise variant. "bUt I hAvE 2 pAy mIlLiOnS 4 tHoSe lICeNsEs" just stop paying then. Take control of your computer bud, you bought it.
 
No clue what these people are on, seperate options for restarting vs update and restart/shutdown have been a think for a long time now and you can install windows without the internet to avoid those disasterous updates during the oobe.

I've no idea why Microsoft is even granted a news article for implementing stuff that's already there or is available through a workaround. You don't even need a workaround for offline installs if you unplug your internet and install an edu or enterprise variant. "bUt I hAvE 2 pAy mIlLiOnS 4 tHoSe lICeNsEs" just stop paying then. Take control of your computer bud, you bought it.
Not sure what you are on, windows has forced you to apply critical or major updates when you shutdown or restart for over a decade now.
 
Sounds like defeat: sorry, our updates keep ruining your PCs, here, have this option to disable our cursed updates forever.

I had 4 updates in 8 months, each breaking boot. Each time it gave me different error codes. One time, I was able to fix the boot by rewriting the boot partition, the next time it did not help.
After the 4th time, I disabled updates permanently. This is pathetic to have such terrible quality control. And I could swear, they are allowing to disable them indefinitely for this and this reason alone: people are spamming complaints, and they simply cannot support so many people at once.

There is this thing in the corporate market that I heard more than once. It refers to a particular nationality being 100% loyal to their people, only hiring theirs, only promoting theirs. I am entertaining this theory that MS has reached full "potential" practicing this "tradition", having their own nationality occupy many positions of responsibility.

I cannot and will not state this is exactly this way, but it would explain it.
 
Good for the percentage of devices affected by the system-breaking update problems, but being "indefinitely", doesn't sound good for the security of the whole computing ecosystem globally.

We know that this is part of their new commitment to regain consumer satisfaction, but,
what is the risk assessment they made? My bet is that probably, only a very tiny percentage of users and sysadmins will bother to postpone the updates once and again (thus indefinitely) for affected devices, so it's basically a non-factor.
 
There is this thing in the corporate market that I heard more than once. It refers to a particular nationality being 100% loyal to their people, only hiring theirs, only promoting theirs. I am entertaining this theory that MS has reached full "potential" practicing this "tradition", having their own nationality occupy many positions of responsibility.

I cannot and will not state this is exactly this way, but it would explain it.
In 2018, Ars convincingly argued what the problem was, going on since Windows 10. See the link above. It is that Microsoft carried on their classical development process in shorter time frames: for example, six months vs. three years. In the old days, the lengthier time between major releases or Service Packs mitigated and masked the fundamental problem: that "stabilising" is separate from writing code; I.e., the classic waterfall-style SDLC instead of a more agile approach, where every update to the codebase is at or near production quality.

Some of the more blatant issues should be caught by extensive automated testing, suggesting it is not being done at the level required for Windows.

Add to this the QA department being retrenched/reassigned since 2014, and generated code being used considerably, say, since 2024, and it explains the further drop in quality of late.
 
I had 4 updates in 8 months, each breaking boot. Each time it gave me different error codes. One time, I was able to fix the boot by rewriting the boot partition, the next time it did not help. After the 4th time, I disabled updates permanently. This is pathetic to have such terrible quality control.
I call BS on this. Win 11 has made me hate the OS -- but not enough to lie about it. In three decades and 1,000 (?) updates, I personally have only had 3-4 fail on me, and only one critically that couldn't be rolled back.

There is this thing in the corporate market that I heard more than once. It refers to a particular nationality being 100% loyal to their people, only hiring theirs, only promoting theirs. I am entertaining this theory that MS has reached full "potential" practicing this "tradition"
It's an entertaining theory I agree, but you might first check in with MS CEO Satya Nadella (born India), MS VP Hossein Nowbar (born Iran), MS VP Takeshi Numoto (Japanese national), MS VP Rajesh Jha (Indian national), MS VP Jean-Philippe Courtois (French national), or former MS VP Heung-Yeung Shum (born China) -- just to name a few.
 
Last edited:
With their OS's reputation at an all time low, MS is desperately trying to appease users by implementing features they have been requesting for literally decades. What next? Will they make search actually search your computer? Will they stop trying to ram Edge and Office down your throats? Will they allow you to install without a MS account nobody wants? I really hope it's too little, too late because they have been doing this and a hundred other confrontational-computing dark-patterns for so long when they thought they could get away with it as users had no viable alternatives. Karma's a b1tch.
 
Sounds like defeat: sorry, our updates keep ruining your PCs, here, have this option to disable our cursed updates forever.

I had 4 updates in 8 months, each breaking boot. Each time it gave me different error codes. One time, I was able to fix the boot by rewriting the boot partition, the next time it did not help.
After the 4th time, I disabled updates permanently. This is pathetic to have such terrible quality control. And I could swear, they are allowing to disable them indefinitely for this and this reason alone: people are spamming complaints, and they simply cannot support so many people at once.

There is this thing in the corporate market that I heard more than once. It refers to a particular nationality being 100% loyal to their people, only hiring theirs, only promoting theirs. I am entertaining this theory that MS has reached full "potential" practicing this "tradition", having their own nationality occupy many positions of responsibility.

I cannot and will not state this is exactly this way, but it would explain it.
You mean subcontinental Indians on H1B visas? Why the self-censorship, are we on Orwellian Earth already?

Speak up; Critical Race Theory is the terminal brain cancer that it is, and it doesn't belong in 2026 and onwards any more.
 
Sordum Windows Update Blocker, is all you need. It actually was designed for medical devices in medical settings that cannot afford to be “updated” and not run thereafter. Good lightweight program, running on all my computers.
 
Not sure what you are on, windows has forced you to apply critical or major updates when you shutdown or restart for over a decade now.
dunno. every month when I manually run it or it force downloads and installs an update I have to the option to restart and the option to update and restart so I guess I'm one of the lucky ones who gets a choice.

fresh install 25h2 in a vm without the internet and run a full update once you hit the desktop, I'm sure if you right click the start button or hit the power button from within the start menu you'll have the option to reboot without applying the updates.
 
I may be wrong, but my guess is that this ability to infinitely postpone update will never make it to retail, at least not without caveats. It will be too nice of MS to allow people to keep opting out of their "experimental services and patches".
 
After you installed Windows 11 they have all the power they don't care if you do updates anymore... they own you
 
I may be wrong, but my guess is that this ability to infinitely postpone update will never make it to retail, at least not without caveats. It will be too nice of MS to allow people to keep opting out of their "experimental services and patches".
all the best windows features are 3rd party tools and all the worst features are windows features.
 
Back