Windows 10's free security updates now extend to October 2027

Daniel Sims

Posts: 2,457   +74
Staff
Recap: Windows 10 technically reached end-of-life last October, and analysts say users have been migrating to Windows 11 in large numbers – but potentially millions are stubbornly holding on to the older OS. Microsoft appears to have quietly acknowledged that reality by tacking on another year to Windows 10's critical security support window.

Microsoft's support page explaining how to continue receiving security updates on Windows 10 now states that the company will continue providing patches through October 12, 2027 – a change made without a formal announcement. The update gives Windows 10 users exactly one additional year to decide whether to upgrade to Windows 11, accept the risks of an unsupported OS, or look elsewhere.

Official support for Windows 10 ended on October 14, 2025, but Microsoft's Extended Security Updates (ESU) program gives some users a way to keep receiving the most critical security patches.

Non-business devices with Microsoft accounts can either redeem 1,000 Microsoft Rewards points, make a one-time $30 purchase, or sync their PC settings to their Microsoft account via the Windows Backup app for free access. Devices in the European Economic Area gained free access to ESU after Euroconsumers, an international consumer advocacy organization, pushed back on Microsoft's original enrollment requirements.

The extension is likely an acknowledgment of Windows 10's enduring popularity. Windows 11 has surged since its predecessor's end-of-life, reaching a 72.57% global desktop market share by February 2026, and continues to widen the gap, but many users consider its upgrades insufficient or are put off by its rapid embrace of AI features.

Recent Windows 11 updates, such as one that broke the Recycle Bin, have drawn widespread criticism, and benchmarks have rated its File Explorer as a step back from Windows 10's.

Around one billion PCs were still running Windows 10 at the end of 2025, according to figures shared during Dell's quarterly earnings call, and hundreds of millions of those cannot meet Windows 11's hardware requirements. Microsoft's insistence on TPM 2.0 has left millions of perfectly functional machines out in the cold, pushing many users to look elsewhere.

For example, 0patch has pledged to provide third-party Windows 10 security patches until 2030, though they may only be a stopgap. Meanwhile, Commodore has pitched its Linux-based Vision OS 3.0 as a free escape route for disgruntled Windows 10 users, and the End of 10 initiative is working to ease the transition to Linux for those with hardware that can't run Windows 11.

France has gone further still, announcing that it will migrate 2.5 million government workstations from Windows to Linux as part of a broader digital sovereignty push. Valve's SteamOS is also making inroads among gaming-focused users.

The RAM crisis may have also factored into Microsoft's decision to extend the ESU program, with new PC prices pushed sharply higher by an ongoing memory shortage. AI giants, Microsoft among them, are racing to build out data centers at scale, diverting much of the world's DRAM and NAND supply and making consumer electronics increasingly expensive.

Permalink to story:

 
The TPM requirement and arbitrary cut-off of barely older CPU generations was exceptionally stupid. Especially given how easy those requirements are to bypass, which shows how completely superfluous they are. W11 ran just fine even on my 12-year-old Haswell laptop.

What did Microsoft think was gonna happen? That everyone would be fine with creating tons of e-waste and throwing perfectly working computers in the trash just for an OS update?
 
The TPM requirement and arbitrary cut-off of barely older CPU generations was exceptionally stupid. Especially given how easy those requirements are to bypass, which shows how completely superfluous they are. W11 ran just fine even on my 12-year-old Haswell laptop.

What did Microsoft think was gonna happen? That everyone would be fine with creating tons of e-waste and throwing perfectly working computers in the trash just for an OS update?
they wanted to push bitlocker on everyone and they needed TPM 2.0 for that
 
The TPM requirement and arbitrary cut-off of barely older CPU generations was exceptionally stupid. Especially given how easy those requirements are to bypass, which shows how completely superfluous they are. W11 ran just fine even on my 12-year-old Haswell laptop.

What did Microsoft think was gonna happen? That everyone would be fine with creating tons of e-waste and throwing perfectly working computers in the trash just for an OS update?
You can get Windows 11 to install on older PCs but certain software will not run. Some games wont run and some software will not run unless you have Windows 11. Dont have to like it but it is what it is. MS will always win in the end whether people like it or not. MS can just keep doing what they are doing by extending but at some point, people will just switch. Its happened before and will happen again.
 
It's not that "users won't upgrade", but because Microslop is not ready yet with full Windoze 11 forced migration, due to numerous Win11 based "breaking" updates.

Otherwise, nothing is stopping MS from forcing users to upgrade.
 
Didn't the EU mandate free Win10 security updates for an extended period? I'd guess M$ just did the right thing and applied that to the whole world, but without explicitly saying so. After all, don't want to spoil the campaign on buying new gear for no reason.
 
Windows 10 is essentially dead. Every single software and driver developer has focus on Windows 11 and had for years now. This is where optimization work happens.

Steam HW Survey: 70% Windows 11 marketshare now. Windows 10 drops every time they update the numbers.

Total Windows marketshare on Steam: 94%

MacOS and Linux (10+ distros) fights over the remaining 6%

Reality calls.
 
Not going to W11 and thats final. I got the best PC you can buy, and everything just works. I dont care about anything W11 related so far. Until they remove all the BS, fix the update breaking everything and remove all the AI = im done thinking about it.
Might be a you issue. I haven't got any of the updates that break anything for me. It may come down to how people use their computer, work vs general use.

I dont know what bs ppl always talk about but nothing is slowing or stopping my computer from functioning as it should. Ive been using windows 11 for a while now. It may be a little different UI and navigating from 10 but under the hood feels the same.
 
They need to allow updates for at least another few years, MS can't expect everyone to purchase new computers just like that. We aren't all bill gates with huge pockets to throw away. I'm for example on an EXTREMELY tight budget. I'm slowly losing rather than gaining now, there is no way I can afford a laptop right now and I need one badly. I still have an old 2014 Macbook Air and I can't upgrade because of my budget.
 
Microsoft needs to extend ESU updates until memory prices go back to normal.
Since they can easily keep patches going with LTSC there's no reason they can't with the ESU version, aside from their push for more profit on telemetry with Windows 11 and to e-waste PC's that would run W11 just fine without the arbitrary system requirements.
 
Stick your updates MS! Locked to Win 10 on my gaming PC for a variety of reasons and it's working GREAT. Files backed-up externally, image file ready if I get nailed (highly unlikely). I don't need your stinking updates MS!
 
Check with a lot of US government beaurocracies. Due to budget constraints, they'll be using W10 for years to come. I know this because I was a tech support agent for Dell Technical Support. The US government will require Microsft to continue to support them. So many uprades ( hardware and software) are expensive and if it already ain't broke, don't fix it.
 
I am not stubbornly holding onto Windows 10. I am intentionally avoiding Windows 11 which is inferior to 10. Why would I switch to a worse product? I didn't want to go to 10 because Windows 7 was all I needed. Given the train wreck of 11, I sure as heck won't be using that. No way. I will switch to Zorin Linux before I use Windows 11.
 
I am not stubbornly holding onto Windows 10. I am intentionally avoiding Windows 11 which is inferior to 10. Why would I switch to a worse product? I didn't want to go to 10 because Windows 7 was all I needed. Given the train wreck of 11, I sure as heck won't be using that. No way. I will switch to Zorin Linux before I use Windows 11.
Windows 10 is much more stable than 11. The only reason I have it is because of the new hardware I bought.
 
Back