Making CPU cores faster rather than adding more cores is the best way to boost PC gaming performance. That's why AMD has supercharged their 8-core, 16-thread CPU to create the Ryzen 7 5800X3D with 3D V-cache.
Making CPU cores faster rather than adding more cores is the best way to boost PC gaming performance. That's why AMD has supercharged their 8-core, 16-thread CPU to create the Ryzen 7 5800X3D with 3D V-cache.
They run at 1080p to eliminate GPU bottlenecks when testing.Who's gonna spend that kind of money on a CPU to play at 1080p. Pointless.
Who's gonna spend that kind of money on a CPU to play at 1080p. Pointless.
Who's gonna spend that kind of money on a CPU to play at 1080p. Pointless.
The final result will depend on the games used. I'd like to see a wider spectrum of games to dilute cases aside like riftbraker, maybe ElderRing or some other modern AAA games?
How about: "Who's gonna spend that kind of money on a12900KS to play at 1080p. Pointless."Who's gonna spend that kind of money on a CPU to play at 1080p. Pointless.
Why? Based on the last 3 years of AMD slides of their upcoming products, you should have known by now that they are more reliable compared to intel or nvidia when it comes to that aspect.I think what impressed me most is that AMD's claim, to run games 15% faster than on the 5800X, turned out to be entirely true. It looks like a great buy for gamers with older generation AMD CPU's. I actually hope all their new generation CPU's (for home use) use this technology.
Was wondering when you'd show up... you realize they DON'T have the gaming crown... it still lost to the 12900KS...Nice to see AMD got gaming performance crown back. Even better to see that Intel fanboys again move goalposts. Previously gaming was all that mattered. Now when AMD is both faster and more efficient, Intel fanboys unsurprisingly are suddenly interested about productivity too
Yeah perhaps on some old titles but on newer that are not Intel optimized games it rocks. Additionally it runs much cooler. Also being much cheaper, there is not real competition here. Get over it.Was wondering when you'd show up... you realize they DON'T have the gaming crown... it still lost to the 12900KS...
Much cheaper? The 12700 is currently at 320 lolYeah perhaps on some old titles but on newer that are not Intel optimized games it rocks. Additionally it runs much cooler. Also being much cheaper, there is not real competition here. Get over it.
Being 2nd is considered the crown for AMD fans, ignore itWas wondering when you'd show up... you realize they DON'T have the gaming crown... it still lost to the 12900KS...
Than 12900KS. Perhaps you should read what post I quoted...Much cheaper? The 12700 is currently at 320 lol
Yeah right. Intel's top CPU is much hotter, much more expensive and requires much more expensive memory. But of course Intel fanboys ignore everything where Intel is behind. Nothing new here.Being 2nd is considered the crown for AMD fans, ignore it
But it's not comparable to the 12900ks. Is the 12600 comparable to the 5950x?Than 12900KS. Perhaps you should read what post I quoted...
I can post you cbr23 score of my 12900k on a small single tower air cooler. It hits 65c. MUCH hotter lol.Yeah right. Intel's top CPU is much hotter, much more expensive and requires much more expensive memory. But of course Intel fanboys ignore everything where Intel is behind. Nothing new here.