Google will start shipping a new Chrome version every two weeks

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 2,515   +935
Staff
Cutting corners: Chrome has shaped the modern web since its 2008 debut, setting the pace for everything from browser standards to update cycles. Now Google is about to speed that clock up again with a much faster release schedule.

Google has announced a notable shift in how Chrome updates will roll out. Starting September 2026, the Chromium-based browser will move to a two-week release cycle. In practice, that means a new major Chrome version every 14 days, though Google notes that early-stage builds and experimental channels will follow slightly different rules.

Developers point out that Chrome has already been speeding up over the years. Since 2021, the project has shipped a new milestone version every four weeks, and in 2023 Google introduced weekly security updates to further tighten the browser's defenses.

According to the company, moving even faster should help deliver security, reliability, and performance improvements more quickly – ultimately benefiting both the web platform and the people using it.

The next phase begins this fall. Chrome 153 is expected to arrive on September 8, 2026, followed by Chrome 154 just two weeks later on September 22. Google says the shift reflects the growing pace of development across the modern web platform. Releases will come more often, but they should also be smaller in scope, a strategy meant to reduce the risk of major disruptions for users and organizations.

The faster cadence will extend beyond the stable channel. Chrome's beta releases will also move to a two-week rhythm across all supported platforms, including desktop, Android, and iOS. For now, however, the Dev and Canary channels will remain unchanged.

Not every branch is speeding up. Google's Extended Stable program – introduced in 2021 to give enterprise administrators more breathing room – will continue operating on an eight-week schedule for both Chromebook and desktop platforms. Over time, though, Google's ChromeOS-powered thin clients are expected to align with the new two-week rhythm as well.

Chrome itself is proprietary software built on Chromium, the open-source project that underpins much of today's browser ecosystem. While Chromium is technically community-driven, Google engineers still contribute the vast majority of its development. Because so many third-party browsers rely on Chromium (like Opera, Tor Browser, Brave, Edge, etc.) changes to Chrome's release model are likely to ripple across the broader ecosystem.

Even Mozilla Firefox, which stands as one of the last independent development efforts in the browser space, was forced to adapt a rapid release model in 2011 to keep pace with Chrome's momentum. As a long-time Firefox user with a particular dislike for constantly updating software, I'm now curious to see how Chrome's next acceleration might influence the future of the Firefox project.

Permalink to story:

 
"As a long-time Firefox user"

On the desktop, I use Firefox, a bit of Edge, and uBlock Origin. On Android, Chrome unfortunately, ads being tackled with ControlD DNS. I'd like to use Firefox with uBlock, but it is sluggish and the address bar's reselecting of text is an annoyance.
 
What makes it sluggish? Is it the browser itself or uBlock that makes it so?
Firefox in general is rather sluggish, there's people with far more coding experience than me who have written explanations as to why Firefox's code is a spaghetti filled mess. There's a lot of cruft left over that has never been cleaned up and the Firefox devs dont seem interested in improving things anytime soon.

Its fine when its new but throw a few years of updates and extensions at it and the browser becomes nigh on unusable at times. The frequent freezing and sluggish browsing is why I switched over to Brave then Opera when Brave started screwing up.
 
Although I use a "chrome" type browser, I can't remember the last time I used Chrome.
Switched to Brave years ago.
 
Chrome with the Malwarebytes Security guard is very fast for me.
It's simple and convenient. Likely pretty secure too with sensible use and checking the settings after each update, plus a security enhancement (block trackers, block most adds, Phishing and Malware - Malwarebytes does all that. It shows how many trackers are blocked in realtime. A lot! Recommended.)

In exchange we have to forget any idea of privacy. Doesn't exist on Chrome. (Yeah, I know we all know that).

I use Chrome for it's speed, and Librewolf mainly for it's advanced security features, anti finger printing, all sorts. It's based off FF, but really quite differerent. This year updates have been frequent.

Finally, Re: LibreWolf, I have been using it for 3 months now, so feel confident to say it's a very good browser for security and privacy. Plenty of settings. In fact it can be locked down so much that some sites won't even work. Duck D Go is the default search engine and ublock is installed together with Librewolf.

It can also be run as an exe only from a USB stick. I did that until I was confident that it was doing what it should.
It even has a seperate exe included in the install package for auto update. Can be run manually, or set as a task.

It's the best privacy focused browser I have tried. Runs pretty quick.
I am now comfortable to recommend it after a good three months of testing, and now using as default.
 
Google policy regarding software updates is pathetically American. Bigger and more is better.

Before Google, browser developers followed the traditional methodology for numbering software releases. Good software would take years to go from version 3.x to 5.x, and any software beyond version 10.x was considered legacy (over 10 years old) and would probably be completely replaced by something written in a completly new language.

Google bastardized all of that. Version 146.x is in all reality probably version 5.x.
 
Back