<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: POPFile, the best free spam filter bar none</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techspot.com/blog/131/popfile-the-best-free-spam-filter-bar-none/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/131/popfile-the-best-free-spam-filter-bar-none/</link>
	<description>Technology news and commentary by the TechSpot.com staff</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/131/popfile-the-best-free-spam-filter-bar-none/#comment-37821</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 16:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techspot.com/blog/131/popfile-the-best-free-spam-filter-bar-none/#comment-37821</guid>
		<description>Try SpamBayes in Outlook, it's also a great freeware, and it has the Spam/Not Spam buttons in the toolbar to make it easy to correct the (very) few mistakes. (I don't get false positives ever, but occasional Unsures and a few false negatives).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try SpamBayes in Outlook, it&#8217;s also a great freeware, and it has the Spam/Not Spam buttons in the toolbar to make it easy to correct the (very) few mistakes. (I don&#8217;t get false positives ever, but occasional Unsures and a few false negatives).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julio Franco</title>
		<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/131/popfile-the-best-free-spam-filter-bar-none/#comment-30781</link>
		<dc:creator>Julio Franco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techspot.com/blog/131/popfile-the-best-free-spam-filter-bar-none/#comment-30781</guid>
		<description>I have to agree that bothered me for quite some time in the past, but now I have set it up in Outlook so POPfile's CP is one click away without using a web browser.
Not as seamless as an integrated "spam/not spam" button but once trained it's nothing that will bother you much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree that bothered me for quite some time in the past, but now I have set it up in Outlook so POPfile&#8217;s CP is one click away without using a web browser.<br />
Not as seamless as an integrated &#8220;spam/not spam&#8221; button but once trained it&#8217;s nothing that will bother you much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/131/popfile-the-best-free-spam-filter-bar-none/#comment-30736</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techspot.com/blog/131/popfile-the-best-free-spam-filter-bar-none/#comment-30736</guid>
		<description>The only problem with POPFile -- and it's a big one -- is training. There's no way to simply click a button and say "This is spam"; you have to open a Web page, find the message, and mark it. Really, really annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem with POPFile &#8212; and it&#8217;s a big one &#8212; is training. There&#8217;s no way to simply click a button and say &#8220;This is spam&#8221;; you have to open a Web page, find the message, and mark it. Really, really annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
