Battlefield 6 anti-cheat system requires Secure Boot, shutting out Linux and legacy PCs

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 2,515   +935
Staff
In a nutshell: Electronic Arts is preparing to launch the next chapter in the Battlefield saga and expects players to fully embrace the new FPS experience. However, many potential buyers may be disappointed by the game's lack of support for Linux-based platforms.

Battlefield 6 will include a powerful anti-cheat system that requires players to enable Secure Boot on their Windows PCs. Battlefield Wire confirmed the news on X, stating that EA's anti-cheat technology will run at the kernel level on Windows and rely on Microsoft's controversial UEFI-based Secure Boot feature.

The anti-cheat system, called Javelin, was previously used in Battlefield 2042 with the same Secure Boot requirement. EA says Javelin improves upon the solution it introduced in 2022 for its multiplayer-focused games. According to the company, the system has protected over 28 million PC players across more than 2.2 billion gaming sessions, boasting an accuracy rate of "over" 99 percent.

EA maintains that Javelin is essential to ensure a fair Battlefield experience. Built by a team of experienced engineers and analysts, the system is designed to deliver "unique" protections tailored to each EA title and its specific cheating threats.

EA confirmed that Javelin is already part of the Battlefield portfolio and will be integrated into Battlefield 6 at launch. The game is scheduled for release on October 10, 2025, for Windows PCs and x86-based consoles from Sony and Microsoft.

While the official PC specifications are fairly forgiving for a modern, graphically intensive title, the mandatory Secure Boot requirement could negatively impact sales.

Because Javelin operates at the kernel level, Battlefield 6 will not run on Linux-based operating systems, even when paired with compatibility layers such as Proton. Since SteamOS and Proton are integral to Valve's Steam Deck, the game will be incompatible with the handheld for the foreseeable future.

Steam Deck incompatibility has also been confirmed by EA executive vice-president Vince Zampella. EA has publicly set the ambitious goal of reaching 100 million players with the new FPS, a target that looks increasingly unrealistic given the Secure Boot requirement and the Javelin anticheat system.

EA may be forced to rethink its approach in the near future, as Microsoft intends to further restrict third-party access to the Windows kernel. On the upside, DICE appears to have made optimizations in asset management and customization: players can choose a "minimum" 55 GB installation containing the core components, or an 80 GB install to access the full Battlefield 6 experience with both single- and multiplayer modes.

Permalink to story:

 
Okay, so don't buy the game. Just torrent it to play through the single player campaign. Cool.

Thanks for the free game EA!

-Linux user
I can't Imagine whatever generic war story EA can cook up in 2025 would compare to classic shooters of old. Does anyone remember the story of 3 or 4?

BFBC1 and 2 are amazing to replay today.
 
Haven't bought anything from EA in well over a decade now. I still vivdly remember the launches of BF:BC2, BF3, BF4, and the differences between them both pre and post-aquisition when they bought Dice.

If I recall correctly, the most enjoyable elements of Battlefield all revolved around player creativity, but the graphics were stunning in the earlier games. Now? It's all so formulaic and recycled.

They haven't earned their asking price in quite some time and have been surviving on the generosity/ignorance of gamers. They certainly havent survived by creating quality titles.
 
Disagree, newer titles for sure this is the trend. Original shooters in both Call of Duty and Battlefield had amazing single-player campaigns, once they moved to a more focused online multiplayer role I lost interest in both IP’s. There is room for both but whatever.
The original battlefield was basically multiplayer only. Sure it had "single player but it was just multiplayer with bots instead of real people. Not what I would call a single player campaign. Battlefield has always been about multiplayer.
 
The original battlefield was basically multiplayer only. Sure it had "single player but it was just multiplayer with bots instead of real people. Not what I would call a single player campaign. Battlefield has always been about multiplayer.
While you are right, I used to play BF 1942 in singleplayer for ages and years. I still do. I know its just bots but yeah. :p I want my singleplayer in BF!
 
I love that Javelin protects 99 percent of players, but also locks out 100 percent of Linux/Deck users.
 
I wonder what percentage of DIY PCs are running secure boot, and how many of their owners would know how to enable it if desired. I don't think it is enabled on any of my 3 home Windows systems and the one time I very briefly played with it gave the impression of requiring more effort than just turning the setting to Enabled (I think it wanted me to provide a key I didn't have?)
 
Well, the current battlefield games deployed anti-cheat that excludes Linux anyways. It's not much of a surprise that the upcoming one also bans Linux. Honesly, I'd say Linux users should just ignore these titles. Buying the game on a different platform only serves to validate their decision.
 
Both BF1 and BF5 no longer work under Linux after fairly recent recent EA updates, and so I would not have expected BF6 to be different. About the same time BF1 and BF5 stopped working, WW3 started working after I've lost interest it.

Linux and EA are incompatible, and it's easier for me to sacrifice BF6 than to go back to Windows especially now that I have been running only Manjaro for so long.
 
I wonder what percentage of DIY PCs are running secure boot, and how many of their owners would know how to enable it if desired. I don't think it is enabled on any of my 3 home Windows systems and the one time I very briefly played with it gave the impression of requiring more effort than just turning the setting to Enabled (I think it wanted me to provide a key I didn't have?)
Turning it on is literally just toggling the option in BIOS. But you do need to have TPM enabled to do so, which may be what you're referencing.
 
Actually the single reason I still dual boot is Battlefield... Was hoping EA to come to their senses, but I guess I won't be buying BF6... 🤷‍♂️
 
Denuvo has entered the chat.

Do you mean the security that allowed Hogwarts Legacy and many other games to be cracked? It took a few sleepless nights, but we succeeded in cracking it in a week. Although it is a hindrance, it primarily kills performance. Therefore, they ought to take it out anyhow.

Additionally, the secure-boot issue will only affect their sales. No regular user wants to mess with their BIOS. Customers running AMD CPU's definitely should not want that. Secure-boot and memory stability are a problem on AMD platforms. Activating such a simple setting can brick AMD setups. And all that trouble just for wall-hack and aimbot to be released when open beta starts on day one. All these "super" anti-cheats are enabling us to set premium prices. Kernel anti-cheat has never worked and is overhyped. Only the smaller dev teams find it difficult to keep up with patches, which just serves to justify our price increases.

If only they spend a bit more on anti-cheat in the correct way they can stop us all, but then I wouldn't have a good paying job anymore. So keep it up?
 
Back