This is hilarious levels of missing the point.
As a software developer/architect/consultant/nerd, with years and years of experience, I am not worried that AI is so competent that my job will be gone.
I am worried that some VP has their annual bonus tied to adopting AI and getting enough productivity to warrant a 40% headcount reduction... where they decide to start with headcount reduction, and expect the remaining devs to make magic happen.
I get there's a really, really subtle difference there, that may be hard for some people to perceive. The AI doesn't need to do my job to replace me. All that needs to happen is for a salesman to convince a director that it *could*. Neither the salesman, nor the VP have any understanding of what the job entails, or what the product or the teams need... they just want to hear that KPIs will be hit, and they'll make their bonus. If it all falls apart in Q3, that's fine, as long as they maximize net until the wheels fall off.
Both are cases of the VC-backed leadership telling the experts in the field that "this is the future".
I am graduating with my Bachelors in Computer Science in the summer this year. I think for our field it wont be this job destroying thing. Its a tool. You dont see carpenters, roofers, etc. out of a job because they decided to use a hammer instead of a rock. Hell even the nail gun did not put people out of jobs. It made the current jobs to be done quicker.
Now I am just only starting out. I work for my city as a programmer. That is just what I think will happen. I dont have the experience to see how it could turn out in all avenues.