1. TechSpot is dedicated to computer enthusiasts and power users. Ask a question and give support. Join the community here.
    TechSpot is dedicated to computer enthusiasts and power users.
    Ask a question and give support.
    Join the community here, it only takes a minute.
    Dismiss Notice

Intel 9th-gen desktop lineup is here, finally fleshes out the Coffee Lake Refresh

By onetheycallEric ยท 24 replies
Apr 23, 2019
Post New Reply
  1. Intel's Coffee Lake Refresh that makes up its 9th-gen processor line has been a long time coming; Intel rolled out the i9-9900K and its i7 and i5 K-SKU brethren late last year, but it didn't come with many of the mid to low end models. As of now, Intel's 9th-gen desktop lineup is complete, coming alongside the new H-series mobile parts powering new 6-core laptops from vendors multiple vendors, with 8-core models soon to come.

    Like the i9-9900K, Intel is fleshing out its 9th-gen lineup with chips based on its 14nm++ manufacturing process. Being another extension of Intel's Skylake architecture, there isn't a wealth of new features. Aside from higher clocks within the same TDP envelope that come with refined silicon, there are things like solder TIM on the K-series. One point of interest is the inclusion of Turbo Boost support for Core i3 chips. This is undoubtedly meant to bolster Intel's defense on the budget segment, where AMD has been considerably dangerous to Intel's marketshare with Ryzen 3 and APU offerings.

    Intel is presumably hoping its full 9th-gen family will help stave off the encroaching AMD and its looming 7nm Ryzen 3000-series. Alas, that's probably a job better suited for Intel's 10nm chips. Nevertheless, Intel's 9th-gen lineup will drop into existing 300-series boards (likely requiring a BIOS update) and will offer more 8-core models, support for up to 128GB of RAM, improved Wi-Fi, and extends Optane Memory support to the entry-level Pentiums and Celerons.

    The 9th-Gen series will see Intel continue its well known price and feature segmentation, as well as introducing its newest "F" and "KF" suffixes. These models are stripped of integrated graphics, a feature Intel tested the waters with somewhat recently. Pentiums and Celerons are now the only dual-core models, as the i3 has gained two more cores in recent years, and Intel has extended Turbo Boost support to the value-minded chips as well.

    Intel states the new processor family is available from retailers immediately; however, color us skeptical with Intel's pervasive 14nm shortages. We'll be keeping an eye on price and availability.

    Permalink to story.

     
  2. MasterMace

    MasterMace TS Booster Posts: 69   +40

    That moment when articles refer to $1600+ builds as "mainstream"
     
  3. kmo911

    kmo911 TS Enthusiast Posts: 86   +8

    When do we needing better cpu gpu ram. i3-i9 9xxx series. when does intel come out with pcie 3.0 1 -5.0 motherboards ?
    can games programs run better with pcie 4.0-5.0 or do we have to wait years like pcie1-2 and 3. what games can benefit of that extra bandwidth. can windows 10 run from scratch at day one if we put a amd r 3000 motheroboard with pcie 4.0 and better ssd readings.
    will there be pcie 5.0 this year.
     
  4. Namtrooper

    Namtrooper TS Enthusiast Posts: 51   +26

    More realistic pci-e 4.0 needs to reach mainstream first.
     
  5. xxLCxx

    xxLCxx Banned Posts: 226   +151

    Getting old wine in new bottles. Thanks, but no!
    These are still the same bug infused processors. Intel benchmarks them without Spectre mitigations. At home, those mitigations will be automatically installed (note that not all bugs can be mitigated!) and your PC will become slower with each newly uncovered bug. To call them bugs is already a lie, though, as Intel was simply cheating and has now been caught. Their response: Keep cheating and deny it (just benchmark as if nothing had ever happened). This only works as long as their journalists (free trips and samples) play along...
     
  6. mat9v

    mat9v TS Rookie

    And yet, there are no known exploits using Spectre, I mean active ones in the wild, not researchers proof of concept ones.
    https://v8.dev/blog/spectre - V8 developers blog (V8 is used in Chrome)
    So on one hand a lot of bugs, on the other, no active exploits, yet Intel CPUs suffer from performance penalty... but in which game? is there a list of those? how big of an impact there is?
    Oh, I know that there is one in server space (impact, I mean), especially in some tasks that have a lot of I/O traffic, database scenarios that have a lot of small reads and writes, due to content switching in kernel being slower after mitigations - but does that impact games? no, not really, some loading times may be a bit longer, network performance may suffer (on 10 Gbit and faster connections). That is all there is to it.
    Frankly even with all mitigations enabled Intel CPUs are still faster than AMD, sure, they suffer in some scenarios but 5Ghz Intel is still faster than 4.35Ghz 2700X (core count being equal) in any task presented. They cost more, are worse in perf/$ but if you have a need and money to spend....
     
    Morris Minor likes this.
  7. xxLCxx

    xxLCxx Banned Posts: 226   +151

    And yet, there are no known exploits using Spectre...??? Except those published by the researchers themselves, of course.
    The nasty thing about those bugs is that they make it nearly impossible to detect exploitation. If you were running your webpage on one of the big server farms and somebody on the same machine was "snooping" all your data and passwords, you wouldn't be able to detect it. Relying on that someone going public with her/his "findings" is just as illusory.
     
  8. fktech

    fktech TS Maniac Posts: 512   +128

    Tick or Tock?
     
  9. Burty117

    Burty117 TechSpot Chancellor Posts: 3,469   +1,254

    The i9-9900T interests me as an always on Plex server at home, 8 Cores/16 Threads with a TDP of 35 Watts. Very tempting, just a shame about the price...
     
  10. Squid Surprise

    Squid Surprise TS Evangelist Posts: 2,450   +1,450

    More like "Ting".... they stopped "Tick, Tock" awhile back....
     
    xxLCxx likes this.
  11. xxLCxx

    xxLCxx Banned Posts: 226   +151

    There already has been a discussion about the "dishonesty" of that offer. Would you actually happen to put them all to use (including "hyper-threading"), the 35W wouldn't be nearly enough. Ergo, you get plenty of cores that are doomed to do nothing. In other words: they are playing you for suckers.
     
  12. fktech

    fktech TS Maniac Posts: 512   +128

    LOL!
     
    xxLCxx likes this.
  13. Burty117

    Burty117 TechSpot Chancellor Posts: 3,469   +1,254

    Ok, so you're saying AMD have something better to offer me? I don't mind the cores not boosting up massively, the threads are what counts for work loads like video trans-coding.
     
  14. Lew Zealand

    Lew Zealand TS Guru Posts: 524   +402

    Looks at list for something cost effective and useful to replace an 8400.
    Finds nothing.
    8400 is good enough I guess...
     
    vimann likes this.
  15. Indekkusu

    Indekkusu TS Rookie

    What is new or refreshed that can actually perform better than the 9900K? And any of them have real in-silicon fix for meltdown and spectre yet? Intel has been disappointing at multiple level for many years by now, and their high prices are not justified, other than the fact they can not even produce enough to avoid surrendering market share.
     
    xxLCxx likes this.
  16. Squid Surprise

    Squid Surprise TS Evangelist Posts: 2,450   +1,450

    This is the rest of the 9000 lineup... the 9900 is the highend... obviously nothing here will beat it!
     
    Burty117 likes this.
  17. pencea

    pencea TS Maniac Posts: 167   +119

    Neither. Intel hasn't made any IPC improvements to their processors since the Skylake generation.
     
    xxLCxx likes this.
  18. xxLCxx

    xxLCxx Banned Posts: 226   +151

    Video transcoding is preferably done in hardware. A dedicated engine can do this much faster while consuming only a fraction of energy. If you insist on using "more flexible" hardware (for weird codecs) then the GPU would be the better choice.
     
  19. fktech

    fktech TS Maniac Posts: 512   +128

    And the software has to be coded to fully use the CPU/GPU!
     
  20. Burty117

    Burty117 TechSpot Chancellor Posts: 3,469   +1,254

    So rather than show me AMD's competing product, you instead tell me to just use different software?

    FYI I am specifically talking about Plex and playing back 4K HDR content using it. Already been trying out Hardware acceleration by sticking in a 1030 into the PC running it and it's hit and miss if it uses the GPU for transcoding.

    If you can show me the competing AMD product (45 TDP, 8 cores, 16 threads) that would be great as I'm sure it's much cheaper than Intels.
     
  21. Squid Surprise

    Squid Surprise TS Evangelist Posts: 2,450   +1,450

    I think what you're looking for would be the Ryzen 2700E

    https://www.amd.com/en/products/cpu/amd-ryzen-7-2700e

    I think it sells for under $300... but prices and availability vary from place to place... and from time to time :)

    Of course, the 3700E is probably on its way - might want to wait for that...
     
    xxLCxx likes this.
  22. Burty117

    Burty117 TechSpot Chancellor Posts: 3,469   +1,254

    I know, I was making a point that xxLCxx went off on one, calling this CPU pointless without comparing it to anything. Even after being called out on it he still didn't link me to a competitor.
    I'm actually finding it nearly impossible to find one to be honest, Amazon, Scan, all the usual places I shop I can't find it at all. Not even listed.
    Definitely, I just have to pray my current Microserver holds out until then.
     
    Squid Surprise likes this.
  23. regiq

    regiq TS Addict Posts: 222   +103

    The quality of the output of an asic video encoder used in consumer hardware is much worse then the output of a good software encoder. Its only good for things like gameplay streaming, when CPU and GPU resources are needed elsewhere.
    Unfortunately I haven't found any video encoder that uses general computing possibilities of modern GPUs with good results, so CPU encoding is still the best way to go when quality matters the most.

    Still a 35W CPU isn't likely a transcoding beast...
     
    Burty117 likes this.
  24. Burty117

    Burty117 TechSpot Chancellor Posts: 3,469   +1,254

    Meh, my current Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 can do 3-4 1080p transcodes at the same time before it all becomes a stuttery mess. I reckon a modern 8 core 16 thread could survive considerably more.
     
  25. mat9v

    mat9v TS Rookie

    Just buy cheapest Ryzen 2700, downclock to 2700E clocks and lower voltages to match. They are the same silicon, maybe, just maybe, binned differently but I doubt that. If you can't reach power use of the "E" version you will get within few W for certain.
     

Add your comment to this article

You need to be a member to leave a comment. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate.
TechSpot Account You may also...