The LG 27GP850 is the true successor to the 27GL850, one of the most popular 1440p IPS gaming monitors of the last few years. The substantial update shows how LG aims to retake the performance throne.
The LG 27GP850 is the true successor to the 27GL850, one of the most popular 1440p IPS gaming monitors of the last few years. The substantial update shows how LG aims to retake the performance throne.
To me, 1440p is just as pointless as 8K (the latter is pointless for different reasons though). Why would you release a display standard with a mere 33% bump? It's around as much of a bump as it was from DVD-Video to 720p. Yet everyone accepted that 720p is just a stop-gap, and (thankfully) died out pretty quickly. Not so with 1440p. It all happened due to the fact that 1080p became stagnant with ever decreasing margins, and manufacturers couldn't (or wouldn't) lower prices of 4K equipment quick enough for them to become widespread.
And here we are in 2021, almost 10 years after 4K becoming an ITU standard, celebrating 1440p monitors. I blame it on
a) AMD's lackluster performance for many years in the GPU market, slowing down innovation due to lack of competition
b) GPU mining / scalpers, making GPU companies not care at all, as stockholders don't put names on buyers, all they see is depleted stocks for years in a row
c) this wonderful stop-gap measure dubbed 1440p, making customers feel it's okay to keep such an outdated standard alive for so long
Today, 4K 60 FPS should be the absolute minimum, and 4K 120 FPS the norm for any recent decent PC build. Not "auto-scaled" 4K, not "checkerboard" 4K, not 4K "somewhere between 30 and 60 FPS", I mean the REAL THING. 4K 60 FPS. Why is it such an issue? How many more years will it take to get there?
What "33%"? (1440p has +78% more pixels) than 1080p. A sizeable jump and desirable sweet spot for many.To me, 1440p is just as pointless as 8K (the latter is pointless for different reasons though). Why would you release a display standard with a mere 33% bump?
It's called deprecating gains. One could calculate that 8k vs 4k is the same upgrade in percentage terms that 640x480 was over 320x240, but that hardly means the improvement is the same on a 27" monitor the same way the jump was huge for the latter on CRT's at the time. Especially if it involves swapping smooth frame rates for a slide-slow during the same year no-one can buy a GPU...It's around as much of a bump as it was from DVD-Video to 720p. Yet everyone accepted that 720p is just a stop-gap, and (thankfully) died out pretty quickly.
Absolute nonsense. A wide variety of monitors is needed, low, med & high plus Ultrawide to fit a wide variety of needs. Only control freaks disagree with that statement and for some strange reason monitor reviews always seem to draw a disproportionately large amount of the "I just bought myself a 4k toy. Therefore everyone should be just like me and I want to ban everything that isn't what I use" dumb epeen sneering out of the woodwork.Today, 4K 60 FPS should be the absolute minimum
There's nowhere to "get to". You simply buy for your needs as do others. If someone only needs 1080p or 1440p, that's up to them, for the same reason it would be laughably dumb to try and ban A4 sized printers simply because A3 printers exist.How many more years will it take to get there?
You still cannot run demaning game at high FPS at 4k "in genera"l, so therefore 4k is for most gamers is a way to high resolution. DLSS and FSR could help speed up the transition, but we are far from there yet. But we are pretty far from being there, 4k 60 ? if I start playing my FPS games at 60-70fps I will die alot more, no thanks. I would want at least 100fps with no micro stuttering with frame sync OFF.To me, 1440p is just as pointless as 8K (the latter is pointless for different reasons though). Why would you release a display standard with a mere 33% bump? It's around as much of a bump as it was from DVD-Video to 720p. Yet everyone accepted that 720p is just a stop-gap, and (thankfully) died out pretty quickly. Not so with 1440p. It all happened due to the fact that 1080p became stagnant with ever decreasing margins, and manufacturers couldn't (or wouldn't) lower prices of 4K equipment quick enough for them to become widespread.
And here we are in 2021, almost 10 years after 4K becoming an ITU standard, celebrating 1440p monitors. I blame it on
a) AMD's lackluster performance for many years in the GPU market, slowing down innovation due to lack of competition
b) GPU mining / scalpers, making GPU companies not care at all, as stockholders don't put names on buyers, all they see is depleted stocks for years in a row
c) this wonderful stop-gap measure dubbed 1440p, making customers feel it's okay to keep such an outdated standard alive for so long
Today, 4K 60 FPS should be the absolute minimum, and 4K 120 FPS the norm for any recent decent PC build. Not "auto-scaled" 4K, not "checkerboard" 4K, not 4K "somewhere between 30 and 60 FPS", I mean the REAL THING. 4K 60 FPS. Why is it such an issue? How many more years will it take to get there?
To me, 1440p is just as pointless as 8K (the latter is pointless for different reasons though).
Today, 4K 60 FPS should be the absolute minimum, and 4K 120 FPS the norm for any recent decent PC build.
To me, 1440p is just as pointless as 8K (the latter is pointless for different reasons though). Why would you release a display standard with a mere 33% bump? It's around as much of a bump as it was from DVD-Video to 720p. Yet everyone accepted that 720p is just a stop-gap, and (thankfully) died out pretty quickly. Not so with 1440p. It all happened due to the fact that 1080p became stagnant with ever decreasing margins, and manufacturers couldn't (or wouldn't) lower prices of 4K equipment quick enough for them to become widespread.
And here we are in 2021, almost 10 years after 4K becoming an ITU standard, celebrating 1440p monitors. I blame it on
a) AMD's lackluster performance for many years in the GPU market, slowing down innovation due to lack of competition
b) GPU mining / scalpers, making GPU companies not care at all, as stockholders don't put names on buyers, all they see is depleted stocks for years in a row
c) this wonderful stop-gap measure dubbed 1440p, making customers feel it's okay to keep such an outdated standard alive for so long
Today, 4K 60 FPS should be the absolute minimum, and 4K 120 FPS the norm for any recent decent PC build. Not "auto-scaled" 4K, not "checkerboard" 4K, not 4K "somewhere between 30 and 60 FPS", I mean the REAL THING. 4K 60 FPS. Why is it such an issue? How many more years will it take to get there?
Very weird https://www.techspot.com/review/1908-lg-27gl850/
all response times tests on 27gl850 have better results than gp850, but the reviewer says the gp850 are faster and better, how?
Nonsense. For many years there was no GPU capable of driving 4K displays at adequate FPS. Playing games at 4K@60Hz and beyond requires latest GPU which are right now nowhere to be found except buying from scalpers at horrendously inflated prices. 1440p is the current sweet spot between 1080 and 4K. Secondly many especially competitive players prefer higher refresh rates at the cost of lower resolution so they will stick with 1080p. Besides you can always hook up your PC to a 4K TV if you can get your hands on a GPU capable of driving it at good refresh rates.To me, 1440p is just as pointless as 8K (the latter is pointless for different reasons though). Why would you release a display standard with a mere 33% bump? It's around as much of a bump as it was from DVD-Video to 720p. Yet everyone accepted that 720p is just a stop-gap, and (thankfully) died out pretty quickly. Not so with 1440p. It all happened due to the fact that 1080p became stagnant with ever decreasing margins, and manufacturers couldn't (or wouldn't) lower prices of 4K equipment quick enough for them to become widespread.
And here we are in 2021, almost 10 years after 4K becoming an ITU standard, celebrating 1440p monitors. I blame it on
a) AMD's lackluster performance for many years in the GPU market, slowing down innovation due to lack of competition
b) GPU mining / scalpers, making GPU companies not care at all, as stockholders don't put names on buyers, all they see is depleted stocks for years in a row
c) this wonderful stop-gap measure dubbed 1440p, making customers feel it's okay to keep such an outdated standard alive for so long
Today, 4K 60 FPS should be the absolute minimum, and 4K 120 FPS the norm for any recent decent PC build. Not "auto-scaled" 4K, not "checkerboard" 4K, not 4K "somewhere between 30 and 60 FPS", I mean the REAL THING. 4K 60 FPS. Why is it such an issue? How many more years will it take to get there?
Some of us have been ranting for years about the still-widely-accepted 1080p@60 Hz "standard" for gaming (console gaming particularly). Surely we should have got good quality 4K@120 Hz displays for $500 or less by now, but that's not the case. That's why we get to use 1440p instead, because 4K is still in the luxury price bracket. You know, life sucks and then you die.To me, 1440p is just as pointless as 8K (the latter is pointless for different reasons though). Why would you release a display standard with a mere 33% bump? It's around as much of a bump as it was from DVD-Video to 720p. Yet everyone accepted that 720p is just a stop-gap, and (thankfully) died out pretty quickly. Not so with 1440p. It all happened due to the fact that 1080p became stagnant with ever decreasing margins, and manufacturers couldn't (or wouldn't) lower prices of 4K equipment quick enough for them to become widespread.
And here we are in 2021, almost 10 years after 4K becoming an ITU standard, celebrating 1440p monitors. I blame it on
a) AMD's lackluster performance for many years in the GPU market, slowing down innovation due to lack of competition
b) GPU mining / scalpers, making GPU companies not care at all, as stockholders don't put names on buyers, all they see is depleted stocks for years in a row
c) this wonderful stop-gap measure dubbed 1440p, making customers feel it's okay to keep such an outdated standard alive for so long
Today, 4K 60 FPS should be the absolute minimum, and 4K 120 FPS the norm for any recent decent PC build. Not "auto-scaled" 4K, not "checkerboard" 4K, not 4K "somewhere between 30 and 60 FPS", I mean the REAL THING. 4K 60 FPS. Why is it such an issue? How many more years will it take to get there?