Musk's Twitter ambitions receive first reality check, courtesy of the EU

Status
Not open for further replies.
You must still get your mail via dog sled. Rachel Levine's transgender identity was revealed while "she" was the chief medical officer of Pennsylvania, long before Biden ever appointed her.

As for Hunter Biden's laptop, maybe Trump threw it out with other White House document's and phone records.

Myself, I didn't give Levine's sexual identity much thought, other than to think, "man, that's one of, or the,ugliest woman, I've ever seen".
The New York Post was banned from twitter for posting a piece on Hunter Biden's laptop seeing how they had one of hundreds of copies of his hard drive. That is a fact.

The Babylon Bee was banned last month from twitter for naming Rachel Levine its Man of the Year. That is a fact.
 
The Babylon Bee was banned last month from twitter for naming Rachel Levine its Man of the Year. That is a fact.
WTF does that have to do with when her transgender identity was known? You claim Biden held it back. You're dead wrong. It was well known well before Biden appointed her.

I could care less who got banned from Twitter. Anyone who feels their "freedom of speech", is being denied, seems to wind up here at Techspot anyway. You get to pump out the same crap, just to a smaller audience.

BTW, I'm not so "woke", I can't appreciate Babylon Bee's "joke".:.
 
WTF does that have to do with when her transgender identity was known? You claim Biden held it back. You're dead wrong. It was well known well before Biden appointed her.

I could care less who got banned from Twitter. Anyone who feels their "freedom of speech", is being denied, seems to wind up here at Techspot anyway. You get to pump out the same crap, just to a smaller audience.

BTW, I'm not so "woke", I can't appreciate Babylon Bee's "joke".:.
I have no idea what 'transgender identity' is but I do know that The Babylon Bee was banned from Twitter last month for naming Rachel Levine its Man of the Year,
 
I have no idea what 'transgender identity' is but I do know that The Babylon Bee was banned from Twitter last month for naming Rachel Levine its Man of the Year,
I see the liberal dog sled was late with your newspaper too.

Oh well here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/transgender

In this case it means he was a man that thought he was a woman, and is now, (ostensibly), a woman

The Beatles explained it in "Get Back", a long, long, time ago., sic:

"Sweet Loretta Modern thought she was a woman
But she was another man
All the girls around her said she's got it comin'
But she gets it while she can"".
 
I see the liberal dog sled was late with your news paper too.

Oh well here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/transgender

In this case it means he was a man that thought he was a woman, and is now, (ostensibly), a woman

The Beatles explained it in< "get Back", a long, long, time ago.

"Sweet Loretta Modern thought she was a woman
But she was another man
All the girls around her said she's got it comin'
But she gets it while she can"".
Not sure what that has to do with the Babylon Bee being banned from Twitter for naming Rachel Levine its Man of the Year.
 
Link please.
I love that so much, I had to give you a like. ꓘOMЯADЗ Neverproof, wants proof!
It was the same reason everyone gets a little chuckle from you
Claiming rumors as fact:


 
I love that so much, I had to give you a like. ꓘOMЯADЗ Neverproof, wants proof!
It was the same reason everyone gets a little chuckle from you
Claiming rumors as fact:


Ya it was this part of that link: 'Skeptics noted that the Ukrainian energy company in question, Burisma, had been previously hacked by the Russian military, and raised concerns that the emails the Post article was based on could have been the result of a Russian disinformation effort.'

The fact of the matter is that Twitter was sent a copy of the laptop hard drive yet they knew it might have an adverse effect on the election so they banned the NYP. btw nobody but the zombies is buying 'The Russians did it' spiel.
 
Not sure what that has to do with the Babylon Bee being banned from Twitter for naming Rachel Levine its Man of the Year.
It's really sad that you can't carry on a train of thought. You spout a load of sh!t how, "Biden didn't tell everyone that Levine was a man", and get proven wrong, and you're back with the Babylon Bee Bullsh!t again.

First off, laugh out loud funny and totally tasteless but not worth the consequences of posting are not mutually exclusive.

Maybe Mr. Bee should have considered Mark Twain's observation, “Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.”
 
It's really sad that you can't carry on a train of thought. You spout a load of sh!t how, "Biden didn't tell everyone that Levine was a man", and get proven wrong, and you're back with the Babylon Bee Bullsh!t again.

First off, laugh out loud funny and totally tasteless but not worth the consequences of posting are not mutually exclusive.

Maybe Mr. Bee should have considered Mark Twain's observation, “Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.”
Let's try this one more time ... 'Why was The Babylon Bee banned from Twitter for naming Rachel Levine its Man of the Year.'

btw I'd hate to think Twitter was anti science.
 
But those posts do get deleted, which is what upset Techspots right wing cabal in the first place.
.
Sure. There is no freedom of speech here, nor on almost any other public forum or venue, because we're not the government and do not have to suffer through things like an absence of civility.

A lot of people do understand that is actually a great benefit, and would not try to impose an ill fitting standard like freedom of speech on something like Twitter. But Musk is an exceptional human being, with parts mad genius offset by parts autistic simpleton.
 
Let's try this one more time ... 'Why was The Babylon Bee banned from Twitter for naming Rachel Levine its Man of the Year.'

btw I'd hate to think Twitter was anti science.
Twitter said it was because of 'hateful conduct'. Because you know, purposefully misgendering is rude, and that was the joke. I'm guessing you'd disagree, but you're not Twitter so it doesn't matter.
 
Twitter said it was because of 'hateful conduct'. Because you know, purposefully misgendering is rude, and that was the joke. I'm guessing you'd disagree, but you're not Twitter so it doesn't matter.
The Babylon Bee named Rachel Levine its Man of the Year last month and was banned from Twitter for that. So much for freedom of speech when you're banned for stating a scientific fact. I could identify as a horse but I wouldn't expect anyone to be punished for not identifying me as anything but a horse.

 
The Babylon Bee named Rachel Levine its Man of the Year last month and was banned from Twitter for that. So much for freedom of speech when you're banned for stating a scientific fact.
Twitter does not have to respect freedom of speech. I feel that is obvious and has been covered adequately. What is it you do not understand about that?
 
Twitter does not have to respect freedom of speech. I feel that is obvious and has been covered adequately. What is it you do not understand about that?
It doesn't have to nor does it hence the reason most of us know Twitter is pushing an agenda which includes anti science. Hopefully Elon Musk fixes that issue no matter how hard the establishment tries to stop him.
 
It doesn't have to nor does it hence the reason most of us know Twitter is pushing an agenda which includes anti science. Hopefully Elon Musk fixes that issue no matter how hard the establishment tries to stop him.
I don't feel the goal of that effort by Twitter's moderators was anti science as much as anti rudeness, but I agree Elon will almost certainly aim to do away with that. Because he personally has no need to be polite to anyone and lacks the empathy to understand what benefit that might bring.
 
I don't feel the goal of that effort by Twitter's moderators was anti science as much as anti rudeness, but I agree Elon will almost certainly aim to do away with that. Because he personally has no need to be polite to anyone and lacks the empathy to understand what benefit that might bring.
I'm reminded of this George Orwell quote after reading that post.

orwell1.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back