The problem is: for how long should I wait to get a GPU? a year, 2, 10? There is no answer to that, and if nothing will change to the end of the year I will probably buy what's available.
Not saying that's not a problem, is just that the framing of the problem goes beyond hardware to me: Why is the assumption that you
need a very capable GPU to
have fun?
This is something not enough people question: why are newer titles coming out
more fun or a better experience just because they
look better? I'm not necessarily saying go back to a very crude abstraction like 8 bit or 16 bit era 2D pixel art, but go back 10 years in gaming and tell me what
exactly is less fun about those games.
And again I'm not trying to single you out (Though I realize it looks like this so just clarifying) but to me there's just too much emphasis on the latest and greatest AAA titles and in no small part it's basically the enthusiasm about PC hardware
in and off itself for example like Jayz2cents once pointed he actually doesn't
really plays the latest and greatest games: it's just older shooters and such and he openly talks about being exited about
building, overclocking and benchmarking the hardware itself as the hobby and not the actual gaming it's supposed to be in service of.
And that'd be fine under normal circumstances if you enjoy it and you can afford it, but if it's actually putting a huge strain on people who can't really stretch out a 200% price increase on many of the parts they need then people who just want to play would do well if they get out of the mentality that they
need anything beyond an APU that can honestly give you PS4 level of graphic performance for the most part and a huge backlog of games to chose from.