Windows 10 users in Europe will receive extended security updates for free

Daniel Sims

Posts: 2,414   +72
Staff
Ripple effect: Windows 10 will reach end-of-life status in less than a month, despite its enduring popularity. Microsoft's temporary program to extend security updates for the operating system typically requires most users to pay or enroll in additional services. However, a European consumer group recently compelled the company to reconsider this policy.

According to a recent open letter from Euroconsumers, Windows 10 users in the European Economic Area can receive an additional year of security updates for free, with no conditions attached. However, the consumer advocacy group remains critical of Microsoft's approach to the transition to Windows 11, which could render millions of otherwise usable PCs obsolete.

Most Windows 10 devices will stop receiving updates after October 14, but millions of PCs that lack TPM 2.0 support cannot upgrade to Windows 11. Moreover, depending on the source, between 35 and 45 percent of Windows users still rely on Windows 10.

Support for Microsoft 365 apps on Windows 10 will continue until October 10, 2028, while standalone versions of Office – Office 2021 and Office 2024 – will receive updates through October 2026 and October 2029, respectively. Nvidia Game Ready drivers will also support Windows 10 through next year.

Consumers outside the European Union can purchase Extended Security Updates, which are valid through October 13, 2026, for either $30 or 1,000 Microsoft Rewards points. Alternatively, ESU can be obtained for free by enrolling in Windows Backup, which automatically syncs personal files with OneDrive; however, free OneDrive accounts store only 5 GB. Companies can purchase three years of ESU, though the cost doubles each year.

In a July letter to Microsoft Ireland, Euroconsumers accused the company of violating the EU's Digital Markets Act, which regulates tech companies that serve a critical number of users. A second letter, sent recently, praises Microsoft for waiving the ESU fee and the Windows Backup requirement for consumers, but Euroconsumers is demanding further action.

Citing prior precedent, Euroconsumers is urging Microsoft to extend Windows 10 support for several years, accusing the company of planned obsolescence.

For example, Windows XP support ended seven years after the launch of Windows Vista, and Windows 7 reached end-of-life eight years after Windows 8 debuted. In contrast, Microsoft is ending Windows 10 support only four years after the release of Windows 11. The request echoes a recent California lawsuit demanding that Microsoft continue supporting Windows 10 until fewer than 10 percent of Windows PCs use it – a milestone that could take several years.

Users who wish to remain secure without upgrading to Windows 11 have a few unofficial options. The End of 10 initiative supports those interested in switching to Linux, and 0patch has pledged to deliver five additional years of unofficial Windows 10 updates. For eligible devices, a Windows 11 Pro license is currently available for just $13.

Permalink to story:

 
This is a manufactured problem. Microsoft stated that windows 10 was going to be the last Windows, it was not. All of this could have been avoided. Also, the TPM module has been cracked so it's not like security is a good reason for the artificial hardware requirements. 99% of the issue could be resolved by removing the hardware requirements.

What in the world is MS doing, none of this makes sense. It causes me physical pain just thinking about this. That's not a joke I have epilepsy and thinking about this issue causes it to act up which represents itself as pain in my lower legs
 
This is a manufactured problem. Microsoft stated that windows 10 was going to be the last Windows, it was not. All of this could have been avoided. Also, the TPM module has been cracked so it's not like security is a good reason for the artificial hardware requirements. 99% of the issue could be resolved by removing the hardware requirements.

What in the world is MS doing, none of this makes sense. It causes me physical pain just thinking about this. That's not a joke I have epilepsy and thinking about this issue causes it to act up which represents itself as pain in my lower legs

Not worth thinking about it because sense, competence, good faith, and Microsoft don't go together. I wish Windows could be open sourced someday, liberating it from the shackles of Redmond, but that won't happen.
 
Microsoft stated that windows 10 was going to be the last Windows, it was not.
Microsoft never said that.

The rest of your statement is good.

Not worth thinking about it because sense, competence, good faith, and Microsoft don't go together.
That is currently true. Needs to change.
I wish Windows could be open sourced someday, liberating it from the shackles of Redmond, but that won't happen.
Pipe dream..
 
Last edited:
Everything MS does is tied to something. MS biggest EU investors such as BlackRock, Norges Bank, etc. probably has something going on in the EU. MS has bosses too, the ones with the most money.
 
Not worth thinking about it because sense, competence, good faith, and Microsoft don't go together. I wish Windows could be open sourced someday, liberating it from the shackles of Redmond, but that won't happen.

You're right about windows not becoming open source, but with MS being a Platinum Member in the Linux Foundation has a lot of open source community pissed.
 
When the lack of patches ends up causing massive problems, I look forward to hearing Microsoft explain to Congress or a court why, having already turned on security updates for all of Europe, it decided to leave out its home country despite it costing next to nothing to having included them.

I'm also curious about the "we'll support US customers if they back up to their data to us" option. On the surface that sounds like it would cost Microsoft extra money, not defray the cost of patches. What are they doing with these backups that makes them a revenue source?
 
I live in Australia but qualified for the extra year of updates free, so I can put off what to do about upgrading from Windows 10. Alas Microsoft is deliberately crippling 10 by not allowing features available to 11, even though they would work on 10.

I have 11 on an older PC that does not have TPM 2.0 as a test bed and it's horrific how much they dumbed it down even on Pro. Luckily you can restore a lot of the functionality of 10 but you shouldn't have to do this. It would have been bad enough for Windows Home edition but for Pro it's outrageous.
 
I live in Australia but qualified for the extra year of updates free, so I can put off what to do about upgrading from Windows 10. Alas Microsoft is deliberately crippling 10 by not allowing features available to 11, even though they would work on 10.

I have 11 on an older PC that does not have TPM 2.0 as a test bed and it's horrific how much they dumbed it down even on Pro. Luckily you can restore a lot of the functionality of 10 but you shouldn't have to do this. It would have been bad enough for Windows Home edition but for Pro it's outrageous.
I realized true power of windows 11 when I upgraded my fairly decent Lenovo laptop. It wasn't just slow, I can notice the delay in every task I did. Of course, high tier PC which I built a year later did not have this problem. But I would never want to use 11 ever again on anything that is not top tier.
They made it for newer hardware. And they should have tied the requirements to the power of hardware rather than TPM module because some devices as I learned, are not a good fit for 11.
 
When the lack of patches ends up causing massive problems, I look forward to hearing Microsoft explain to Congress or a court why, having already turned on security updates for all of Europe, it decided to leave out its home country despite it costing next to nothing to having included them.

I'm also curious about the "we'll support US customers if they back up to their data to us" option. On the surface that sounds like it would cost Microsoft extra money, not defray the cost of patches. What are they doing with these backups that makes them a revenue source?
You can say the same about OneDrive.

Could be that it is "just" a ploy to tie customers closer to Windows. There more people invest in infrastructure, the bigger the hurdle it is for them to change ie. switch to Linux or Mac.
 
Microsoft stated that windows 10 was going to be the last Windows, it was not.

Microsoft never said that.

Ah YES they did!

In 2015, Jerry Nixon, a Microsoft employee, stated that Windows 10 would be the "last version of Windows" at the company's Ignite conference.

They were transitioning to Windows as a Service business model.
 
I realized true power of windows 11 when I upgraded my fairly decent Lenovo laptop. It wasn't just slow, I can notice the delay in every task I did. Of course, high tier PC which I built a year later did not have this problem. But I would never want to use 11 ever again on anything that is not top tier.
They made it for newer hardware. And they should have tied the requirements to the power of hardware rather than TPM module because some devices as I learned, are not a good fit for 11.
This was likely due to bloatware on your laptop, or a slow drive, or not enough RAM or all the above and not the operating system.
 
This was likely due to bloatware on your laptop, or a slow drive, or not enough RAM or all the above and not the operating system.
Nah. It worked amazingly smooth with Win 10. The negative change was so drastic for no apparent reason that the only excuse would be newer OS.
 
This was likely due to bloatware on your laptop, or a slow drive, or not enough RAM or all the above and not the operating system.
nah, try doing anything in win 11. You stare at spinning circles constantly. Just opening windows explorer takes nearly twice as long as it did on win 10. Click something, wait. Even a brand new installed OS, its slow as piss.

And im a bit of a MS fan boy but win 11 performance is horrific.

Even on my i9, 4080 with 64 gb of RAM and m.2 hard drive.
 
I look forward to hearing Microsoft explain to Congress

What's this "Congress" you're talking about? That's not part of the US that I'm aware of. The only thing that matters is executive orders, and I'm sure that if Microsoft fires Lisa Monaco is could end Windows 10 support in the US right now with no consequences. Well, maybe that and sell 10% to the US. That worked for Intel.

99% of the issue could be resolved by removing the hardware requirements.

Sure, Microsoft could remove the TPM requirement, I just don't think it would help much. I find it unlikely that the hardware is the problem. I'd bet that most people running Windows 10 can upgrade to 11, they just don't want to. That's what Microsoft wants to address by forcing the move.
 
Back