Comments on: Firefox Myths Debunked – Part 2

By: Thomas

Thomas — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:36:32 +0000

BTW - To anyone else reading this. Would a "fanboy" make comments like these? From last september; Security (No Active X, although as popularity grows Firefox IS & WILL be exploited more & more - they keep fixing them though) & again; Let it not be said that Mozilla is without security flaws. Though as I've said before, they also do a better job of fixing anything brought to their attention. Perhaps the author you'd like to misquote me again with the above? As I've already said, failure to answer the initial question regarding your Quotes use merely proves what I've been stating.

By: Thomas

Thomas — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 21:24:20 +0000

The "fanboy" comments aren't cutting it with anyone. Here's a simple question which I & others have asked you repeatedly. Explain why you misquote myself & others on your site. Not answering this question merely confirms what I've stated in the forum. I'll not be addressing any other points until you answer this.

By: Andrew K

Andrew K — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 02:43:36 +0000

I’ve always answered every question asked by not from fanboys. I just never answer questions from people like you who make all sorts of personal attacks and then demand answers to loaded questions.

You pathetic attempt to debunk my Myths page fails miserably. You just make alot of excuses but do not prove the Myth.

Firefox is irrefutably not “secure” no matter how many excuses you make.

So long as Firefox can download executables and includes the extension system XPCOM which is similar to ActiveX, it is irrefutably no more secure for not having ActiveX.

The third one is absolutely laughable as nothing you say proves Firefox is fully standards compliant, it irrefutably is not.

As I always say excuses and rhetoric.